Cross-cultural validity of the Five-Factor Personality Inventory for ICD-11 across nine countries and validation of a French translation.

Yann Le Corff, Anton Aluja, Kokou A Atitsogbe, Robert Courtois, Donatien Dahourou, Karine Forget, Michel Hansenne, Durairaj Kavitha, Kossi B Kounou, Mélanie Lapalme, Joshua R Oltmanns, Jérôme Rossier, Arun Tipandjan, Thomas A Widiger, Jean-Pierre Rolland
{"title":"Cross-cultural validity of the Five-Factor Personality Inventory for ICD-11 across nine countries and validation of a French translation.","authors":"Yann Le Corff, Anton Aluja, Kokou A Atitsogbe, Robert Courtois, Donatien Dahourou, Karine Forget, Michel Hansenne, Durairaj Kavitha, Kossi B Kounou, Mélanie Lapalme, Joshua R Oltmanns, Jérôme Rossier, Arun Tipandjan, Thomas A Widiger, Jean-Pierre Rolland","doi":"10.1037/per0000711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess measurement invariance for the Five-Factor Inventory for <i>ICD-11</i> (Oltmanns & Widiger, 2020) across nine national samples from four continents (<i>n</i> = 6,342), and to validate a French translation in seven French-speaking national samples. All were convenience samples of adults. Exploratory factor analyses supported a four-factor structure in the French-speaking Western samples (Belgium, Canada, France, and Switzerland) while a three-factor structure was preferred in the French-speaking African samples (Burkina Faso and Togo), and no adequate structure was found in the Indian sample. Factor congruence with the original American sample was excellent for the Western samples but not for the non-Western samples. Exploratory bifactor analyses led to similar results, with the g-factor essentially reflecting one of the first-order factors observed in the exploratory factor analyses. Support for configural, metric, scalar (partial), and strict invariance was obtained across the six Western samples, as well as across the two African samples. Support for criterion validity of the Five-Factor Inventory for <i>ICD-11</i> scales was also obtained, with relevant associations between scale scores and the presence of a mental health diagnosis and consulting a mental health professional, but validity was lower in the non-Western samples. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to assess measurement invariance for the Five-Factor Inventory for ICD-11 (Oltmanns & Widiger, 2020) across nine national samples from four continents (n = 6,342), and to validate a French translation in seven French-speaking national samples. All were convenience samples of adults. Exploratory factor analyses supported a four-factor structure in the French-speaking Western samples (Belgium, Canada, France, and Switzerland) while a three-factor structure was preferred in the French-speaking African samples (Burkina Faso and Togo), and no adequate structure was found in the Indian sample. Factor congruence with the original American sample was excellent for the Western samples but not for the non-Western samples. Exploratory bifactor analyses led to similar results, with the g-factor essentially reflecting one of the first-order factors observed in the exploratory factor analyses. Support for configural, metric, scalar (partial), and strict invariance was obtained across the six Western samples, as well as across the two African samples. Support for criterion validity of the Five-Factor Inventory for ICD-11 scales was also obtained, with relevant associations between scale scores and the presence of a mental health diagnosis and consulting a mental health professional, but validity was lower in the non-Western samples. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

本研究旨在评估 ICD-11 五因素量表(Oltmanns & Widiger,2020 年)在四大洲九个国家样本(n = 6342)中的测量不变性,并在七个法语国家样本中验证法文译本。所有样本均为成人便利样本。探索性因素分析支持西方法语国家样本(比利时、加拿大、法国和瑞士)的四因素结构,而非洲法语国家样本(布基纳法索和多哥)则倾向于三因素结构,在印度样本中没有发现适当的结构。在西方样本中,因子与原始美国样本的一致性非常好,但在非西方样本中则不然。探索性双因素分析得出了类似的结果,g 因子基本上反映了探索性因素分析中观察到的一阶因素之一。六个西方样本和两个非洲样本的构型、度量、标度(部分)和严格不变量均得到支持。ICD-11 五因素量表的标准效度也得到了支持,量表得分与是否有心理健康诊断和是否咨询过心理健康专业人员之间存在相关联系,但在非西方样本中效度较低。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2025 APA,版权所有。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信