Within- and Between-Person Differences in Activity Factor Structure: Results From an Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Allison A M Bielak, Jacqueline A Mogle, Martin J Sliwinski
{"title":"Within- and Between-Person Differences in Activity Factor Structure: Results From an Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.","authors":"Allison A M Bielak, Jacqueline A Mogle, Martin J Sliwinski","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbaf017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Studies using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of activity participation rely on items tapping domains informed by factor analyses based on single time points. Analyses from a single time point focus on differences between participants and provide little insight into how activities cluster together within a person across moments or days. The present study compared the factor structure in activity participation between- and within-persons using an expanded set of momentary activity items in middle and older adulthood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using tablets, 81 adults aged 41 to 94 years reported activities completed in the past 3-4 hr 5 times per day for 14 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common activities during the day involved social interactions, reading, and computer work. Watching TV or videos was the most common evening activity. Multilevel factor analysis simultaneously computed both intra-individual factors (within-person) and inter-individual factors (between-person). Four within-person and 4 between-person factors provided the best model fit, with 3 common factors: cognitive (read, computer); social (events, mentoring, providing care); and passive (TV, games). There were notable differences in the fourth factor.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although three common activity factors were found between individuals and within persons from day to day, the divergence between the fourth intra- and inter-individual factors provides insight into how activity engagement operates at different timescales and likely reflects daily demands versus long-term goals. EMA provides a window into engagement throughout and across days, but researchers who commonly use retrospective reports of between-person activity engagement may find distinctly different results from factor analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":56111,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Studies using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of activity participation rely on items tapping domains informed by factor analyses based on single time points. Analyses from a single time point focus on differences between participants and provide little insight into how activities cluster together within a person across moments or days. The present study compared the factor structure in activity participation between- and within-persons using an expanded set of momentary activity items in middle and older adulthood.

Methods: Using tablets, 81 adults aged 41 to 94 years reported activities completed in the past 3-4 hr 5 times per day for 14 days.

Results: The most common activities during the day involved social interactions, reading, and computer work. Watching TV or videos was the most common evening activity. Multilevel factor analysis simultaneously computed both intra-individual factors (within-person) and inter-individual factors (between-person). Four within-person and 4 between-person factors provided the best model fit, with 3 common factors: cognitive (read, computer); social (events, mentoring, providing care); and passive (TV, games). There were notable differences in the fourth factor.

Discussion: Although three common activity factors were found between individuals and within persons from day to day, the divergence between the fourth intra- and inter-individual factors provides insight into how activity engagement operates at different timescales and likely reflects daily demands versus long-term goals. EMA provides a window into engagement throughout and across days, but researchers who commonly use retrospective reports of between-person activity engagement may find distinctly different results from factor analyses.

活动因子结构的人内与人间差异:一项生态瞬时评价研究的结果。
目的:利用活动参与的生态瞬间评估(EMA)的研究依赖于基于单一时间点的因子分析所告知的项目挖掘域。从单个时间点进行的分析侧重于参与者之间的差异,并不能深入了解一个人在几分钟或几天内的活动是如何聚集在一起的。本研究采用一套扩展的瞬间活动项目,比较了中老年人活动参与的人际和内部因素结构。方法:使用片剂,81名41 - 94岁的成年人报告在过去3-4小时内完成活动,每天5次,持续14天。结果:白天最常见的活动包括社交、阅读和电脑工作。看电视或视频是最常见的夜间活动。多层次因素分析同时计算个体内因素(人内因素)和个体间因素(人间因素)。4个人内因素和4个人之间因素提供了最佳的模型拟合,其中有三个常见因素:认知(阅读、计算机);社交(活动、指导、提供照顾);被动因素(电视、游戏)。在第四个因素上存在显著差异。讨论:尽管在个体之间和个体内部每天都发现了三个共同的活动因素,但第四种个体内部和个体间因素之间的差异提供了对活动参与在不同时间尺度上如何运作的洞察,并可能反映日常需求与长期目标。EMA提供了全天和跨天参与的窗口,但通常使用人际活动参与回顾性报告的研究人员可能会从因素分析中发现明显不同的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences publishes articles on development in adulthood and old age that advance the psychological science of aging processes and outcomes. Articles have clear implications for theoretical or methodological innovation in the psychology of aging or contribute significantly to the empirical understanding of psychological processes and aging. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, attitudes, clinical applications, cognition, education, emotion, health, human factors, interpersonal relations, neuropsychology, perception, personality, physiological psychology, social psychology, and sensation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信