Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease on Maintenance Dialysis

Chia-Pin Lin MD , Fu-Chih Hsiao MD , Ying-Chang Tung MD , Tzyy-Jer Hsu MD , Shing-Hsien Chou MD , Yu-Sheng Lin MD , Shao-Wei Chen MD, PhD , Pao-Hsien Chu MD
{"title":"Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease on Maintenance Dialysis","authors":"Chia-Pin Lin MD ,&nbsp;Fu-Chih Hsiao MD ,&nbsp;Ying-Chang Tung MD ,&nbsp;Tzyy-Jer Hsu MD ,&nbsp;Shing-Hsien Chou MD ,&nbsp;Yu-Sheng Lin MD ,&nbsp;Shao-Wei Chen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Pao-Hsien Chu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases. Intravascular imaging (IVI)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been shown to result in better clinical outcomes than angiography guidance. Nevertheless, the clinical outcomes of IVI-guided PCI in ESRD patients remain uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of OCT- and IVUS-guided PCIs in ESRD patients and to report the trend of IVI-guided PCI in Taiwan.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with ESRD on maintenance dialysis, who underwent OCT- or IVUS-guided PCI from 2015 to 2021, were compared by propensity-score matching. The primary outcome was composite cardiovascular outcomes, including coronary revascularization, cardiovascular death, and acute myocardial infarction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 2021, IVI was used to guide PCIs in 27% (15,613 of 57,845) of general and 27.5% (1,754 of 6,387) of ESRD patients. Among 4,759 eligible ESRD patients, 443 and 4,316 patients underwent OCT- and IVUS-guided PCIs, respectively. After matching, the incidence of the primary outcome was comparable between the OCT and IVUS groups (42.1 [95% CI: 36.2-48.0] vs 47.6 [95% CI: 43.0-52.2] events per 100 person-years; HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.74-1.06). The results were similar for all components of the primary outcome and in subgroup analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The number of PCI- and IVI-guided procedures has progressively increased in the past decade in Taiwan in both the general and ESRD populations. Among ESRD patients on maintenance dialysis, the clinical outcomes were comparable between OCT- and IVUS-guided PCI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73529,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Asia","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 28-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772374724004101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases. Intravascular imaging (IVI)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been shown to result in better clinical outcomes than angiography guidance. Nevertheless, the clinical outcomes of IVI-guided PCI in ESRD patients remain uncertain.

Objectives

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of OCT- and IVUS-guided PCIs in ESRD patients and to report the trend of IVI-guided PCI in Taiwan.

Methods

Patients with ESRD on maintenance dialysis, who underwent OCT- or IVUS-guided PCI from 2015 to 2021, were compared by propensity-score matching. The primary outcome was composite cardiovascular outcomes, including coronary revascularization, cardiovascular death, and acute myocardial infarction.

Results

In 2021, IVI was used to guide PCIs in 27% (15,613 of 57,845) of general and 27.5% (1,754 of 6,387) of ESRD patients. Among 4,759 eligible ESRD patients, 443 and 4,316 patients underwent OCT- and IVUS-guided PCIs, respectively. After matching, the incidence of the primary outcome was comparable between the OCT and IVUS groups (42.1 [95% CI: 36.2-48.0] vs 47.6 [95% CI: 43.0-52.2] events per 100 person-years; HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.74-1.06). The results were similar for all components of the primary outcome and in subgroup analyses.

Conclusions

The number of PCI- and IVI-guided procedures has progressively increased in the past decade in Taiwan in both the general and ESRD populations. Among ESRD patients on maintenance dialysis, the clinical outcomes were comparable between OCT- and IVUS-guided PCI.
血管内成像引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗终末期肾病维持性透析患者。
背景:终末期肾病(ESRD)患者发生心血管疾病的风险较高。使用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)或血管内超声(IVUS)进行血管内成像(IVI)引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)已被证明比血管造影指导产生更好的临床结果。然而,ivi引导下的ESRD患者PCI的临床结果仍不确定。目的:本研究旨在比较OCT和ivus引导下的PCI在ESRD患者中的临床效果,并报告ivi引导下的PCI在台湾的发展趋势。方法:对2015年至2021年期间接受OCT或ivus引导的PCI治疗的ESRD维持性透析患者进行倾向-评分匹配比较。主要结局是心血管综合结局,包括冠状动脉血运重建术、心血管死亡和急性心肌梗死。结果:2021年,IVI用于指导27%(57,845例中有15,613例)的普通患者和27.5%(6,387例中有1,754例)的ESRD患者的pci。在4759例符合条件的ESRD患者中,分别有443例和4316例患者接受了OCT和ivus引导的pci。匹配后,OCT组和IVUS组的主要结局发生率具有可比性(42.1 [95% CI: 36.2-48.0] vs 47.6 [95% CI: 43.0-52.2]事件/ 100人年;人力资源:0.88;95% ci: 0.74-1.06)。主要结局的所有组成部分和亚组分析的结果相似。结论:在过去的十年中,在台湾的普通人群和ESRD人群中,PCI和ivi引导手术的数量逐渐增加。在接受维持性透析的ESRD患者中,OCT和ivus引导的PCI的临床结果是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Asia
JACC. Asia Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信