The development and validation of a Japanese hazard perception task.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to validate the hazard perception task developed for Japanese drivers with brain damage.

Methods: A total of 36 professional driving instructors, 67 older adult drivers, 39 young drivers, and 72 patients with brain damage participated in the study. A video-based hazard perception task measured the hazard perception skills of each group. Participants were instructed to touch the screen as soon as they identified a hazard. Outcome measures included the number of hazards identified and response latency. Comparisons were made between groups for each hazard type: environmental prediction hazard (EPH) and behavioral prediction hazard (BPH).

Results: Patients with brain damage demonstrated fewer hazard detections and longer response latencies than driving instructors and older adult drivers, regardless of the hazard type. The hazard perception skills of patients with brain damage were comparable to those of young drivers across both hazard types. Driving instructors exhibited the highest number of hazard detections and the fastest response latencies among all groups, with differences being more pronounced for EPH than for BPH.

Conclusions: Thus, the validity of the hazard perception task developed for Japanese drivers with brain damage was confirmed. Future research should examine the predictive validity of the developed task, particularly its relationship with crash rates in individuals with brain damage.