What's on the agenda? Examining public health communication about opioids.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Erin Willis, Ye Wang, Somaieh Goudarzvand, Yugyung Lee
{"title":"What's on the agenda? Examining public health communication about opioids.","authors":"Erin Willis, Ye Wang, Somaieh Goudarzvand, Yugyung Lee","doi":"10.1177/13591053241312043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The way media portray public health problems influences the public's perception of problems and related solutions. Social media allows users to engage with news and to collectively construct meaning. This paper examined news in comparison to user-generated content related to opioids to understand the role of second-level agenda-setting in public health. We analyzed 162,760 tweets about the opioid crisis, and compared the main topics and their sentiments with 2998 opioid stories from <i>The New York Times</i> online. Evidence from this study suggests that second-level agenda setting on social media is different from the news; public communication about opioids on X/Twitter highlights attributes that are different from the ones highlighted in news. The findings suggest that public health communication should strategically utilize social media data, including obtaining consumer insight from personal tweets, listening to diverse views and warning signs from issue tweets, and tuning to the media for policy trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"13591053241312043"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241312043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The way media portray public health problems influences the public's perception of problems and related solutions. Social media allows users to engage with news and to collectively construct meaning. This paper examined news in comparison to user-generated content related to opioids to understand the role of second-level agenda-setting in public health. We analyzed 162,760 tweets about the opioid crisis, and compared the main topics and their sentiments with 2998 opioid stories from The New York Times online. Evidence from this study suggests that second-level agenda setting on social media is different from the news; public communication about opioids on X/Twitter highlights attributes that are different from the ones highlighted in news. The findings suggest that public health communication should strategically utilize social media data, including obtaining consumer insight from personal tweets, listening to diverse views and warning signs from issue tweets, and tuning to the media for policy trends.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信