{"title":"Evolution of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education From 2000 to 2024: Bibliometric Analysis.","authors":"Rui Li, Tong Wu","doi":"10.2196/63775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into medical education has gained significant attention for its potential to enhance teaching and learning outcomes. However, it lacks a comprehensive study depicting the academic performance and status of AI in the medical education domain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to analyze the social patterns, productive contributors, knowledge structure, and clusters since the 21st century.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Documents were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database from 2000 to 2024. VOSviewer, Incites, and Citespace were used to analyze the bibliometric metrics, which were categorized by country, institution, authors, journals, and keywords. The variables analyzed encompassed counts, citations, H-index, impact factor, and collaboration metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 7534 publications were initially retrieved and 2775 were included for analysis. The annual count and citation of papers exhibited exponential trends since 2018. The United States emerged as the lead contributor due to its high productivity and recognition levels. Stanford University, Johns Hopkins University, National University of Singapore, Mayo Clinic, University of Arizona, and University of Toronto were representative institutions in their respective fields. Cureus, JMIR Medical Education, Medical Teacher, and BMC Medical Education ranked as the top four most productive journals. The resulting heat map highlighted several high-frequency keywords, including performance, education, AI, and model. The citation burst time of terms revealed that AI technologies shifted from imaging processing (2000), augmented reality (2013), and virtual reality (2016) to decision-making (2020) and model (2021). Keywords such as mortality and robotic surgery persisted into 2023, suggesting the ongoing recognition and interest in these areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides valuable insights and guidance for researchers who are interested in educational technology, as well as recommendations for pioneering institutions and journal submissions. Along with the rapid growth of AI, medical education is expected to gain much more benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e63775"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/63775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into medical education has gained significant attention for its potential to enhance teaching and learning outcomes. However, it lacks a comprehensive study depicting the academic performance and status of AI in the medical education domain.
Objective: This study aims to analyze the social patterns, productive contributors, knowledge structure, and clusters since the 21st century.
Methods: Documents were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database from 2000 to 2024. VOSviewer, Incites, and Citespace were used to analyze the bibliometric metrics, which were categorized by country, institution, authors, journals, and keywords. The variables analyzed encompassed counts, citations, H-index, impact factor, and collaboration metrics.
Results: Altogether, 7534 publications were initially retrieved and 2775 were included for analysis. The annual count and citation of papers exhibited exponential trends since 2018. The United States emerged as the lead contributor due to its high productivity and recognition levels. Stanford University, Johns Hopkins University, National University of Singapore, Mayo Clinic, University of Arizona, and University of Toronto were representative institutions in their respective fields. Cureus, JMIR Medical Education, Medical Teacher, and BMC Medical Education ranked as the top four most productive journals. The resulting heat map highlighted several high-frequency keywords, including performance, education, AI, and model. The citation burst time of terms revealed that AI technologies shifted from imaging processing (2000), augmented reality (2013), and virtual reality (2016) to decision-making (2020) and model (2021). Keywords such as mortality and robotic surgery persisted into 2023, suggesting the ongoing recognition and interest in these areas.
Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights and guidance for researchers who are interested in educational technology, as well as recommendations for pioneering institutions and journal submissions. Along with the rapid growth of AI, medical education is expected to gain much more benefits.
背景:将人工智能(AI)纳入医学教育因其提高教学和学习成果的潜力而受到广泛关注。然而,缺乏一项全面的研究来描述人工智能在医学教育领域的学术表现和地位。目的:分析21世纪以来的社会形态、生产力贡献者、知识结构和集群特征。方法:检索Web of Science Core Collection数据库2000 - 2024年的文献。使用VOSviewer、Incites和Citespace对文献计量指标进行了分析,这些指标按国家、机构、作者、期刊和关键词进行了分类。分析的变量包括计数、引用、h指数、影响因子和协作指标。结果:最初共检索到7534篇文献,其中2775篇纳入分析。自2018年以来,年度论文数量和被引量呈指数增长趋势。美国因其高生产率和高认可度而成为主要贡献者。斯坦福大学、约翰霍普金斯大学、新加坡国立大学、梅奥诊所、亚利桑那大学和多伦多大学是各自领域的代表性机构。《Cureus》、《JMIR Medical Education》、《Medical Teacher》和《BMC Medical Education》被评为生产力最高的4大期刊。由此产生的热图突出了几个高频关键词,包括性能、教育、人工智能和模型。术语的引用爆发时间表明,人工智能技术从图像处理(2000年)、增强现实(2013年)、虚拟现实(2016年)转向决策(2020年)和模型(2021年)。死亡率和机器人手术等关键词持续到2023年,表明人们对这些领域的认识和兴趣仍在继续。结论:本研究为对教育技术感兴趣的研究人员提供了有价值的见解和指导,并为开拓机构和期刊投稿提供了建议。随着人工智能的快速发展,医学教育有望获得更多的好处。