Perceived impact of physiotherapy-related debates on the social platform "X" on physiotherapists' professional development and knowledge acquisition: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Maryam Alasfour, Zainab Lajami, Abdullah Algashami
{"title":"Perceived impact of physiotherapy-related debates on the social platform \"X\" on physiotherapists' professional development and knowledge acquisition: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Maryam Alasfour, Zainab Lajami, Abdullah Algashami","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06760-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Saudi Arabia, the social media platform \"X\" (formerly known as \"Twitter\") is widely utilized by healthcare professionals. This study aimed to assess the perceived impact of physiotherapy-related debates on X on the professional development and knowledge acquisition of physiotherapists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, online survey-based study was conducted among licensed physiotherapists in Saudi Arabia. The study followed established international reporting guidelines, including the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology, Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys, and Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 188 physiotherapists participated, with the majority (n = 143;76.1%) actively using X. Many participants indicated positive impacts on their perspectives or approaches to physiotherapy, enhancement of their critical thinking skills, and acquisition of new knowledge or insights (n = 73; 51.0% agreed, n = 26; 18.2% strongly agreed). Furthermore, participants reported gaining knowledge of research findings (n = 45; 31.5% agreed, n = 44; 30.8% strongly agreed) and new treatment techniques (n = 48; 33.6% agreed, n = 42; 29.4% strongly agreed). Additionally, 30.1% (n = 43) agreed and 6.3% (n = 9) strongly agreed that these debates influenced their professional development, whereas 46.2% (n = 66) remained neutral.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physiotherapy-related debates on the social media platform X positively impacted physiotherapists' perspectives by enhancing critical thinking and knowledge acquisition. Such online debates may serve as valuable tools for professional development in physiotherapy practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06760-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Saudi Arabia, the social media platform "X" (formerly known as "Twitter") is widely utilized by healthcare professionals. This study aimed to assess the perceived impact of physiotherapy-related debates on X on the professional development and knowledge acquisition of physiotherapists.

Methods: A cross-sectional, online survey-based study was conducted among licensed physiotherapists in Saudi Arabia. The study followed established international reporting guidelines, including the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology, Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys, and Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys.

Results: A total of 188 physiotherapists participated, with the majority (n = 143;76.1%) actively using X. Many participants indicated positive impacts on their perspectives or approaches to physiotherapy, enhancement of their critical thinking skills, and acquisition of new knowledge or insights (n = 73; 51.0% agreed, n = 26; 18.2% strongly agreed). Furthermore, participants reported gaining knowledge of research findings (n = 45; 31.5% agreed, n = 44; 30.8% strongly agreed) and new treatment techniques (n = 48; 33.6% agreed, n = 42; 29.4% strongly agreed). Additionally, 30.1% (n = 43) agreed and 6.3% (n = 9) strongly agreed that these debates influenced their professional development, whereas 46.2% (n = 66) remained neutral.

Conclusions: Physiotherapy-related debates on the social media platform X positively impacted physiotherapists' perspectives by enhancing critical thinking and knowledge acquisition. Such online debates may serve as valuable tools for professional development in physiotherapy practice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信