Identifying Adolescent and Young Adults' Preferences for Oncology Symptom Management Clinical Trial Participation.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Robert Knoerl, Liat Smener, Katherine Grandinetti, Leslie A Fecher, N Lynn Henry, Yasmin Karimi, Kristen Pettit, Scott Schuetze, Emily Walling, Anao Zhang, Debra Barton
{"title":"Identifying Adolescent and Young Adults' Preferences for Oncology Symptom Management Clinical Trial Participation.","authors":"Robert Knoerl, Liat Smener, Katherine Grandinetti, Leslie A Fecher, N Lynn Henry, Yasmin Karimi, Kristen Pettit, Scott Schuetze, Emily Walling, Anao Zhang, Debra Barton","doi":"10.1097/NCC.0000000000001463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most studies to date exploring facilitators and barriers to adolescent and young adults' (AYAs') participation in clinical trials have been focused on external factors to AYAs' participation or recruitment strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to determine AYA cancer survivors' preferences for oncology symptom management clinical trial participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews and conjoint analysis were conducted to clarify potential attributes (eg, characteristics) and levels (eg, value of the characteristic) that may be important to AYA cancer survivors when considering clinical trial participation (n = 19). The final list of attributes and levels was administered within a choice-based conjoint analysis survey (n = 52). The utility score for each level was analyzed using hierarchical Bayes estimation, and the feature importance for each attribute was quantified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The type of new treatment (22.9%) and perceived importance of study topic (19.5%) were the most important attributes identified by participants. The levels with the highest utility scores within each attribute included prescription medicine treatment with mild side effects, electronic surveys, under-30-minute study visits, no follow-up visits, 4-week treatment period, and once-a-week treatment frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data support that study designs with low participant burden, interventions with few side effects, and the involvement of AYAs in determining the priority of the research topic are appealing to AYAs when considering participation in symptom management trials.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>AYA participation in clinical trials is necessary to develop new symptom management modalities. Clinicians may use the results to introduce clinical trials containing trial characteristics that appeal to AYA cancer survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50713,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most studies to date exploring facilitators and barriers to adolescent and young adults' (AYAs') participation in clinical trials have been focused on external factors to AYAs' participation or recruitment strategies.

Objective: The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to determine AYA cancer survivors' preferences for oncology symptom management clinical trial participation.

Methods: Semistructured interviews and conjoint analysis were conducted to clarify potential attributes (eg, characteristics) and levels (eg, value of the characteristic) that may be important to AYA cancer survivors when considering clinical trial participation (n = 19). The final list of attributes and levels was administered within a choice-based conjoint analysis survey (n = 52). The utility score for each level was analyzed using hierarchical Bayes estimation, and the feature importance for each attribute was quantified.

Results: The type of new treatment (22.9%) and perceived importance of study topic (19.5%) were the most important attributes identified by participants. The levels with the highest utility scores within each attribute included prescription medicine treatment with mild side effects, electronic surveys, under-30-minute study visits, no follow-up visits, 4-week treatment period, and once-a-week treatment frequency.

Conclusion: The data support that study designs with low participant burden, interventions with few side effects, and the involvement of AYAs in determining the priority of the research topic are appealing to AYAs when considering participation in symptom management trials.

Implications for practice: AYA participation in clinical trials is necessary to develop new symptom management modalities. Clinicians may use the results to introduce clinical trials containing trial characteristics that appeal to AYA cancer survivors.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Nursing
Cancer Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
244
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each bimonthly issue of Cancer Nursing™ addresses the whole spectrum of problems arising in the care and support of cancer patients--prevention and early detection, geriatric and pediatric cancer nursing, medical and surgical oncology, ambulatory care, nutritional support, psychosocial aspects of cancer, patient responses to all treatment modalities, and specific nursing interventions. The journal offers unparalleled coverage of cancer care delivery practices worldwide, as well as groundbreaking research findings and their practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信