Adaptation of the Florida Cognitive Activities Scale for Latinx adults with chronic diseases.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Ethnicity & Health Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1080/13557858.2025.2458306
Heather Cuevas, Elizabeth Muñoz, Shenell Wood, Jeeyeon Kim, Alexandra García
{"title":"Adaptation of the Florida Cognitive Activities Scale for Latinx adults with chronic diseases.","authors":"Heather Cuevas, Elizabeth Muñoz, Shenell Wood, Jeeyeon Kim, Alexandra García","doi":"10.1080/13557858.2025.2458306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Latinx adults experience disparately high rates of chronic diseases and cognitive dysfunction. Participating in cognitive-stimulating activities, such as reading, is thought to improve and preserve cognitive function. However, little is known about cognitively stimulating activities preferred by Latinx adults. In addition, surveys to measure participation in cognitively stimulating activities are not culturally sensitive to Latinx preferences and tend to feature activities that require financial resources and leisure time and may not include cognitively stimulating activities that are more accessible or preferable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an instrumentation study in three phases to adapt the Florida Cognitive Activities Scale (FCAS): Phase (1) revision and translation of the FCAS for Latinx adults with chronic diseases; Phase (2) feasibility testing; and Phase (3) reliability and validity testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five experts provided input on existing items, with suggestions for changes or items to remove and for new items. The resulting 17 item FCAS-Latinx (FCAS-L) was translated into Spanish and back-translated and determined to be readable at the 6th grade level. The FACS-L was administered to 70 participants (mean age 62.17 years; 57% female; 51% Mexican American) with other surveys that measured cognitive functioning and chronic disease management. To select the final items, we analyzed the item discrimination index, item-to-total correlations, and participants' feedback. The final 20-item Spanish - and English versions of the FCAS-L are internally consistent (Cronbach alpha = 0.74 and 0.81, respectively), showed good construct validity (higher scores on cognitive functioning tests correlated with engaging in more frequent cognitively stimulating activities, <i>r</i> = 0.63, <i>P</i> < .01), and temporal reliability (the interclass correlation coefficient between test and retest times was 0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FCAS-L is a valid and reliable updated measure of cognitively stimulating activities for Spanish- and English-speaking Latinx adults with chronic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51038,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Health","volume":" ","pages":"398-412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2025.2458306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Latinx adults experience disparately high rates of chronic diseases and cognitive dysfunction. Participating in cognitive-stimulating activities, such as reading, is thought to improve and preserve cognitive function. However, little is known about cognitively stimulating activities preferred by Latinx adults. In addition, surveys to measure participation in cognitively stimulating activities are not culturally sensitive to Latinx preferences and tend to feature activities that require financial resources and leisure time and may not include cognitively stimulating activities that are more accessible or preferable.

Methods: We conducted an instrumentation study in three phases to adapt the Florida Cognitive Activities Scale (FCAS): Phase (1) revision and translation of the FCAS for Latinx adults with chronic diseases; Phase (2) feasibility testing; and Phase (3) reliability and validity testing.

Results: Five experts provided input on existing items, with suggestions for changes or items to remove and for new items. The resulting 17 item FCAS-Latinx (FCAS-L) was translated into Spanish and back-translated and determined to be readable at the 6th grade level. The FACS-L was administered to 70 participants (mean age 62.17 years; 57% female; 51% Mexican American) with other surveys that measured cognitive functioning and chronic disease management. To select the final items, we analyzed the item discrimination index, item-to-total correlations, and participants' feedback. The final 20-item Spanish - and English versions of the FCAS-L are internally consistent (Cronbach alpha = 0.74 and 0.81, respectively), showed good construct validity (higher scores on cognitive functioning tests correlated with engaging in more frequent cognitively stimulating activities, r = 0.63, P < .01), and temporal reliability (the interclass correlation coefficient between test and retest times was 0.81).

Conclusion: The FCAS-L is a valid and reliable updated measure of cognitively stimulating activities for Spanish- and English-speaking Latinx adults with chronic conditions.

佛罗里达认知活动量表对拉丁裔成人慢性疾病的适应性
背景:拉丁裔成年人慢性疾病和认知功能障碍的发病率不同。参与认知刺激活动,如阅读,被认为可以改善和保持认知功能。然而,人们对拉丁裔成年人喜欢的认知刺激活动知之甚少。此外,衡量参与认知刺激活动的调查对拉丁美洲人的偏好在文化上不敏感,往往以需要财力和闲暇时间的活动为特色,可能不包括更容易获得或更可取的认知刺激活动。方法:对佛罗里达认知活动量表(FCAS)进行了三个阶段的仪器研究:第一阶段:拉丁裔成人慢性病患者FCAS的修订和翻译;(2)可行性测试;阶段(3)信度和效度检验。结果:5位专家对现有项目提供了意见,并对更改或删除项目和新项目提出了建议。所产生的17个项目FCAS-Latinx (FCAS-L)被翻译成西班牙语和反翻译,并确定为六年级水平可读。FACS-L纳入70名参与者(平均年龄62.17岁;57%的女性;51%的墨西哥裔美国人),以及其他测量认知功能和慢性疾病管理的调查。为了选择最终项目,我们分析了项目歧视指数、项目与总相关性和参与者的反馈。最终的20项西班牙语和英语版本的FCAS-L内部一致(Cronbach alpha分别= 0.74和0.81),显示出良好的结构效度(认知功能测试得分较高与参与更频繁的认知刺激活动相关,r = 0.63, P)结论:FCAS-L是西班牙语和英语拉丁裔慢性疾病成年人认知刺激活动的有效和可靠的更新测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Health
Ethnicity & Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Health is an international academic journal designed to meet the world-wide interest in the health of ethnic groups. It embraces original papers from the full range of disciplines concerned with investigating the relationship between ’ethnicity’ and ’health’ (including medicine and nursing, public health, epidemiology, social sciences, population sciences, and statistics). The journal also covers issues of culture, religion, gender, class, migration, lifestyle and racism, in so far as they relate to health and its anthropological and social aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信