Noah Chow , Sabrina I. Sinopoli , Mitchel C. Whittal , Drew A. Bednar , Diane E. Gregory
{"title":"An investigation of the mechanism of adjacent segment disease in a porcine spine model","authors":"Noah Chow , Sabrina I. Sinopoli , Mitchel C. Whittal , Drew A. Bednar , Diane E. Gregory","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fusion changes the biomechanics of the spine leading to the potential development of adjacent segment disease. Despite many studies on adjacent segment disease, it is largely unknown how spinal fixation affects the mechanical properties of the adjacent disc. The purpose of this study was to assess whether axial compression causes mechanical disruption to the annulus when the caudal spinal level is immobilized or injured.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fifty-two porcine spines were assigned to one of four conditions: 1) control; 2) injured (18.5-gauge needle inserted into the nucleus of cervical 4/5); 3) immobilized (18-gauge steel wire wrapped around the transverse and spinous processes of cervical 4/5); and 4) injured+immobilized. Each specimen was then subjected to 0.5 Hz cyclic compression (300−1200N) for two hours. Post-compression, three annular samples were dissected from the cervical 3/4 disc (<strong><em>adjacent</em></strong> to immobilized and/or injured level) and mechanically tested. The same loading protocol and annular testing was also conducted in eight human cadaveric lumbar spines.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Immobilization and injury resulted in a reduction in <strong><em>adjacent</em></strong> disc lamellar strength including toe region stress (<em>p</em> < 0.001), initial failure stress (<em>p</em> = 0.03), and ultimate stress (<em>p</em> = 0.004), with immobilization having the greatest impact. Similar findings were observed in the human cadaver samples with reduced toe region strength in the injured+ immobilized samples compared to the control (<em>p</em> = 0.049).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The current study provides empirical evidence of decreased lamellar strength in the disc adjacent to an immobilized and/or injured level following prolonged cyclic axial loading, lending mechanistic insight into the development of adjacent segment disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 106441"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325000130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Fusion changes the biomechanics of the spine leading to the potential development of adjacent segment disease. Despite many studies on adjacent segment disease, it is largely unknown how spinal fixation affects the mechanical properties of the adjacent disc. The purpose of this study was to assess whether axial compression causes mechanical disruption to the annulus when the caudal spinal level is immobilized or injured.
Methods
Fifty-two porcine spines were assigned to one of four conditions: 1) control; 2) injured (18.5-gauge needle inserted into the nucleus of cervical 4/5); 3) immobilized (18-gauge steel wire wrapped around the transverse and spinous processes of cervical 4/5); and 4) injured+immobilized. Each specimen was then subjected to 0.5 Hz cyclic compression (300−1200N) for two hours. Post-compression, three annular samples were dissected from the cervical 3/4 disc (adjacent to immobilized and/or injured level) and mechanically tested. The same loading protocol and annular testing was also conducted in eight human cadaveric lumbar spines.
Findings
Immobilization and injury resulted in a reduction in adjacent disc lamellar strength including toe region stress (p < 0.001), initial failure stress (p = 0.03), and ultimate stress (p = 0.004), with immobilization having the greatest impact. Similar findings were observed in the human cadaver samples with reduced toe region strength in the injured+ immobilized samples compared to the control (p = 0.049).
Interpretation
The current study provides empirical evidence of decreased lamellar strength in the disc adjacent to an immobilized and/or injured level following prolonged cyclic axial loading, lending mechanistic insight into the development of adjacent segment disease.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field.
The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management.
A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly.
Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians.
The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time.
Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.