Differences in kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity between underwater dolphin kicking and flutter kicking: multiple approaches using three-dimensional motion analysis, electromyography, and hydrodynamic simulation.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Keisuke Kobayashi Yamakawa, Kenta Homoto, Motomu Nakashima, Hirofumi Shimojo, Yusaku Nakazono, Yasuo Sengoku, Hideki Takagi
{"title":"Differences in kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity between underwater dolphin kicking and flutter kicking: multiple approaches using three-dimensional motion analysis, electromyography, and hydrodynamic simulation.","authors":"Keisuke Kobayashi Yamakawa, Kenta Homoto, Motomu Nakashima, Hirofumi Shimojo, Yusaku Nakazono, Yasuo Sengoku, Hideki Takagi","doi":"10.1080/14763141.2025.2458473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is well-known among swimmers and coaches that the swimming speed of the underwater dolphin kick (UDK) is higher than that of the underwater flutter kick (UFK). This study aimed to clarify the differences in swimming performance between the two kicking styles in terms of kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity. Eight male swimmers performed UDK and UFK in a water flume at same effort levels. The three-dimensional motion analysis and measurement of surface electromyography for the left lower limb were performed. The fluid forces acting on the body and joint torques were estimated using Swumsuit simulator. As the results, the kick amplitude and range of joint motion were smaller for the UFK than for the UDK, and the muscle activity and the peak joint torques of the hip and knee were lower for the UFK than for the UDK. Furthermore, the estimated propulsion for both the downward and upward kicks was lower for the UFK than for the UDK. Therefore, our results suggest that the differences in propulsion between the two kicking styles, caused by the differences in movement and muscle activity, may influence the differences in swimming speed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49482,"journal":{"name":"Sports Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2025.2458473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well-known among swimmers and coaches that the swimming speed of the underwater dolphin kick (UDK) is higher than that of the underwater flutter kick (UFK). This study aimed to clarify the differences in swimming performance between the two kicking styles in terms of kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity. Eight male swimmers performed UDK and UFK in a water flume at same effort levels. The three-dimensional motion analysis and measurement of surface electromyography for the left lower limb were performed. The fluid forces acting on the body and joint torques were estimated using Swumsuit simulator. As the results, the kick amplitude and range of joint motion were smaller for the UFK than for the UDK, and the muscle activity and the peak joint torques of the hip and knee were lower for the UFK than for the UDK. Furthermore, the estimated propulsion for both the downward and upward kicks was lower for the UFK than for the UDK. Therefore, our results suggest that the differences in propulsion between the two kicking styles, caused by the differences in movement and muscle activity, may influence the differences in swimming speed.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Biomechanics
Sports Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
135
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Biomechanics is the Thomson Reuters listed scientific journal of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (ISBS). The journal sets out to generate knowledge to improve human performance and reduce the incidence of injury, and to communicate this knowledge to scientists, coaches, clinicians, teachers, and participants. The target performance realms include not only the conventional areas of sports and exercise, but also fundamental motor skills and other highly specialized human movements such as dance (both sport and artistic). Sports Biomechanics is unique in its emphasis on a broad biomechanical spectrum of human performance including, but not limited to, technique, skill acquisition, training, strength and conditioning, exercise, coaching, teaching, equipment, modeling and simulation, measurement, and injury prevention and rehabilitation. As well as maintaining scientific rigour, there is a strong editorial emphasis on ''reader friendliness''. By emphasising the practical implications and applications of research, the journal seeks to benefit practitioners directly. Sports Biomechanics publishes papers in four sections: Original Research, Reviews, Teaching, and Methods and Theoretical Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信