Administering the Lidcombe Program to children who stutter with concomitant disorders: Insights from an exploratory retrospective chart review study

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Sébastien Finlay , Pascaline Kengne Talla , Maïlie Fortin , Julie Braën , Laurie Levesque , Ingrid Verduyckt
{"title":"Administering the Lidcombe Program to children who stutter with concomitant disorders: Insights from an exploratory retrospective chart review study","authors":"Sébastien Finlay ,&nbsp;Pascaline Kengne Talla ,&nbsp;Maïlie Fortin ,&nbsp;Julie Braën ,&nbsp;Laurie Levesque ,&nbsp;Ingrid Verduyckt","doi":"10.1016/j.jfludis.2025.106101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Children who stutter (CWS) in clinical settings may present with concomitant disorders (CDs), which can complexify the delivery of the Lidcombe Program (LP). However, there is limited evidence on how CDs influence treatment outcomes in CWS, leaving clinicians with little guidance regarding best practices with these children. This exploratory study, conducted in partnership with a rehabilitation center's clinical team, aims to understand which CDs and suspected CDs speech-language pathologists document when treating CWS with the LP and their relationship to treatment characteristics and outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A retrospective chart review was conducted on 47 children diagnosed with developmental stuttering who received the LP between 2016 and 2018.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>38 CWS (80.9 %) had either at least one confirmed (59.6 %) or suspected (21.3 %) CD, of which 61.7 % were language-related and 27.6 % attention-related. CWS with diagnosed and suspected CDs had significantly higher stuttering severity rating (SR) scores post-treatment as compared to CWS without CDs (<em>p =</em>.001), although all groups significantly reduced their stuttering. There were high drop-out rates in all groups. CWS with diagnosed and suspected CDs who dropped out had significantly higher SR scores than CWS without CDs who progressed to Stage 2 (<em>p =</em>.011 and <em>p =</em>.014, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The LP is effective in improving fluency in both CWS with and without CDs. However, CWS with diagnosed or suspected CDs finished or dropped out of Stage 1 with significantly higher SR scores than CWS without CDs. Future research is needed to confirm these results and investigate the factors underlying the observed differences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluency Disorders","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 106101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluency Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094730X25000038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Children who stutter (CWS) in clinical settings may present with concomitant disorders (CDs), which can complexify the delivery of the Lidcombe Program (LP). However, there is limited evidence on how CDs influence treatment outcomes in CWS, leaving clinicians with little guidance regarding best practices with these children. This exploratory study, conducted in partnership with a rehabilitation center's clinical team, aims to understand which CDs and suspected CDs speech-language pathologists document when treating CWS with the LP and their relationship to treatment characteristics and outcomes.

Method

A retrospective chart review was conducted on 47 children diagnosed with developmental stuttering who received the LP between 2016 and 2018.

Results

38 CWS (80.9 %) had either at least one confirmed (59.6 %) or suspected (21.3 %) CD, of which 61.7 % were language-related and 27.6 % attention-related. CWS with diagnosed and suspected CDs had significantly higher stuttering severity rating (SR) scores post-treatment as compared to CWS without CDs (p =.001), although all groups significantly reduced their stuttering. There were high drop-out rates in all groups. CWS with diagnosed and suspected CDs who dropped out had significantly higher SR scores than CWS without CDs who progressed to Stage 2 (p =.011 and p =.014, respectively).

Conclusion

The LP is effective in improving fluency in both CWS with and without CDs. However, CWS with diagnosed or suspected CDs finished or dropped out of Stage 1 with significantly higher SR scores than CWS without CDs. Future research is needed to confirm these results and investigate the factors underlying the observed differences.
对伴有结巴障碍的儿童实施利德库姆计划:一项探索性回顾性图表回顾研究的见解。
目的:在临床环境中口吃(CWS)的儿童可能会出现伴随性疾病(cd),这可能会使Lidcombe计划(LP)的实施复杂化。然而,关于cd如何影响CWS治疗结果的证据有限,这使得临床医生对这些儿童的最佳实践几乎没有指导。这项探索性研究是与一家康复中心的临床团队合作进行的,旨在了解言语语言病理学家在使用LP治疗CWS时记录了哪些cd和疑似cd,以及它们与治疗特征和结果的关系。方法:对2016年至2018年接受LP治疗的47例发育性口吃患儿进行回顾性图表分析。结果:38例CWS(80.9 %)至少有一种CD确诊(59.6 %)或疑似(21.3 %),其中61.7 %与语言相关,27.6 %与注意相关。与没有口吃的CWS相比,确诊和疑似口吃的CWS治疗后的口吃严重程度评分(SR)得分显著更高(p =.001),尽管所有组的口吃均显著减少。所有组的辍学率都很高。确诊和疑似cd的CWS退出的SR评分明显高于进展到2期的无cd的CWS (p =。011和p =。014年,分别)。结论:LP能有效提高有或无cd的CWS流利度。然而,诊断或疑似cd的CWS完成或退出i期,其SR评分明显高于无cd的CWS。未来的研究需要证实这些结果,并调查观察到的差异背后的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Journal of Fluency Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Fluency Disorders provides comprehensive coverage of clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects of stuttering, including the latest remediation techniques. As the official journal of the International Fluency Association, the journal features full-length research and clinical reports; methodological, theoretical and philosophical articles; reviews; short communications and much more – all readily accessible and tailored to the needs of the professional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信