An ergonomic assessment of British Army Infantry career training courses to identify opportunities for evidence-based interventions to enhance role-related physical fitness.

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Tessa D Maroni, Stephen D Myers, Lt Col Julie Draper, Kimberly M Ashdown, Faye S Walker, Maj Barry Alexander, Sam D Blacker
{"title":"An ergonomic assessment of British Army Infantry career training courses to identify opportunities for evidence-based interventions to enhance role-related physical fitness.","authors":"Tessa D Maroni, Stephen D Myers, Lt Col Julie Draper, Kimberly M Ashdown, Faye S Walker, Maj Barry Alexander, Sam D Blacker","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2456538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An ergonomic assessment was conducted to quantify the activities and physical demands during the British Army's 8-week Platoon Sergeant and Section Commander Battle Courses (PSBC, SCBC). Twenty PSBC and 18 SCBC male infantry soldiers volunteered. Body Mass (BM) was measured pre- and post-course, with course physical activity levels (PAL), energy expenditure (EE) and sleep profiles quantified using tri-axial accelerometery. The courses were predominately field-based, involving slow and rapid load carriage tasks, digging and moving casualties. Average daily EE (SCBC = 4020 ± 599 vs. PSBC = 3876 ± 525 kcal.day<sup>-1</sup>; <i>p>0.05</i>) and BM decreases were similar (SCBC = -3.9 ± 2.9 vs. PSBC = -2.0 ± 2.7 kg; <i>p>0.05</i>). Daily PAL was higher for SCBC than PSBC (2.1 ± 0.3 vs. 2.0 ± 0.3, <i>p=0.041</i>), likely due to greater moderate-vigorous activity levels (<i>p=0.003).</i> Daily sleep durations were variable, but similar across courses (≈5.1 hr.day<sup>-1</sup>; <i>p>0.05</i>). These data confirm these courses are arduous and can be used to inform course-specific physical screening tests and training to increase course success.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2456538","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An ergonomic assessment was conducted to quantify the activities and physical demands during the British Army's 8-week Platoon Sergeant and Section Commander Battle Courses (PSBC, SCBC). Twenty PSBC and 18 SCBC male infantry soldiers volunteered. Body Mass (BM) was measured pre- and post-course, with course physical activity levels (PAL), energy expenditure (EE) and sleep profiles quantified using tri-axial accelerometery. The courses were predominately field-based, involving slow and rapid load carriage tasks, digging and moving casualties. Average daily EE (SCBC = 4020 ± 599 vs. PSBC = 3876 ± 525 kcal.day-1; p>0.05) and BM decreases were similar (SCBC = -3.9 ± 2.9 vs. PSBC = -2.0 ± 2.7 kg; p>0.05). Daily PAL was higher for SCBC than PSBC (2.1 ± 0.3 vs. 2.0 ± 0.3, p=0.041), likely due to greater moderate-vigorous activity levels (p=0.003). Daily sleep durations were variable, but similar across courses (≈5.1 hr.day-1; p>0.05). These data confirm these courses are arduous and can be used to inform course-specific physical screening tests and training to increase course success.

英国陆军步兵职业培训课程的人体工程学评估,以确定循证干预的机会,以增强与角色相关的身体健康。
在英国陆军为期8周的排长和科长战斗课程(PSBC, SCBC)中,进行了一项人体工程学评估,以量化活动和身体需求。20名邮储部队和18名SCBC男性步兵自愿参加。在课程前和课程后测量身体质量(BM),并使用三轴加速度计量化课程体力活动水平(PAL)、能量消耗(EE)和睡眠谱。这些课程主要以实地为基础,包括缓慢和快速的负载运输任务,挖掘和移动伤亡人员。平均日EE (SCBC = 4020±599 vs. PSBC = 3876±525 kcal.day-1;p > 0.05)和BM减少相似(SCBC = -3.9±2.9 vs PSBC = -2.0±2.7公斤;p > 0.05)。SCBC的每日PAL高于PSBC(2.1±0.3比2.0±0.3,p=0.041),可能是由于更高的中度剧烈运动水平(p=0.003)。每日睡眠时间各不相同,但各疗程相似(≈5.1小时.day-1;p > 0.05)。这些数据证实,这些课程是艰巨的,可用于通知课程特定的物理筛选测试和培训,以提高课程的成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ergonomics
Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives. The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people. All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信