An updated systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression of the factors associated with human visceral leishmaniasis in the Americas.

IF 5.5 1区 医学
Anna Gabryela Sousa Duarte, Guilherme Loureiro Werneck, Sarah de Farias Lelis, Thays Santos Mendonça, Daniela Dias Vasconcelos, Tiago Silveira Gontijo, Álisson Oliveira Dos Santos, Lucas Edel Donato, Vinícius Silva Belo
{"title":"An updated systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression of the factors associated with human visceral leishmaniasis in the Americas.","authors":"Anna Gabryela Sousa Duarte, Guilherme Loureiro Werneck, Sarah de Farias Lelis, Thays Santos Mendonça, Daniela Dias Vasconcelos, Tiago Silveira Gontijo, Álisson Oliveira Dos Santos, Lucas Edel Donato, Vinícius Silva Belo","doi":"10.1186/s40249-025-01274-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a systemic disease with high case-fatality rates and a widespread distribution. Continuous evaluation of the risk factors for VL is essential to ensure the effective implementation of prevention and control measures. The present study reviews the factors associated with VL in the Americas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review updates a previous 2013 report by including cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies published between July 2011 and April 2024. Associations between VL and risk factors were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression models. Studies were classified according to level of evidence using the GRADE approach and the evolution in the quality of investigations was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six studies were included in the review and 21 variables were evaluated in the meta-analyses. Combination of all study types revealed that men had greater chances of VL than women, but the association was strong and significant only in case-control studies. Although higher chances of VL in children and in households with dogs or chickens/other fowl were identified in case-control studies, an inverse association was observed in cross-sectional and cohort studies. Higher chances of VL were associated with poor economic/living conditions, individuals living in domiciles with backyards or with seropositive dogs, and individuals with prior contact with infected household members/relatives/neighbors. The level of evidence for associations of VL with sex and age was classified as moderate whilst that for all other associations was either low or very low. The methodological quality of recent studies showed a positive progression but shortcomings were still evident regarding selection criteria and methods of data analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While there is a higher incidence of symptomatic VL among men and children, the likelihood of infection is similar between the groups. There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the presence of dogs or fowl at the domicile increases the chances of VL. However, socioeconomic and living conditions, as well as previous occurrence of human and canine VL, are influential factors. Future research should be conducted with greater statistical power and using molecular diagnostic techniques, preferably involving cohort studies in diverse Latin American countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":48820,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","volume":"14 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-025-01274-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Human visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a systemic disease with high case-fatality rates and a widespread distribution. Continuous evaluation of the risk factors for VL is essential to ensure the effective implementation of prevention and control measures. The present study reviews the factors associated with VL in the Americas.

Methods: This systematic review updates a previous 2013 report by including cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies published between July 2011 and April 2024. Associations between VL and risk factors were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression models. Studies were classified according to level of evidence using the GRADE approach and the evolution in the quality of investigations was assessed.

Results: Forty-six studies were included in the review and 21 variables were evaluated in the meta-analyses. Combination of all study types revealed that men had greater chances of VL than women, but the association was strong and significant only in case-control studies. Although higher chances of VL in children and in households with dogs or chickens/other fowl were identified in case-control studies, an inverse association was observed in cross-sectional and cohort studies. Higher chances of VL were associated with poor economic/living conditions, individuals living in domiciles with backyards or with seropositive dogs, and individuals with prior contact with infected household members/relatives/neighbors. The level of evidence for associations of VL with sex and age was classified as moderate whilst that for all other associations was either low or very low. The methodological quality of recent studies showed a positive progression but shortcomings were still evident regarding selection criteria and methods of data analysis.

Conclusion: While there is a higher incidence of symptomatic VL among men and children, the likelihood of infection is similar between the groups. There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the presence of dogs or fowl at the domicile increases the chances of VL. However, socioeconomic and living conditions, as well as previous occurrence of human and canine VL, are influential factors. Future research should be conducted with greater statistical power and using molecular diagnostic techniques, preferably involving cohort studies in diverse Latin American countries.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对美洲人类内脏利什曼病相关因素进行荟萃分析和荟萃回归的最新系统综述。
背景:人内脏利什曼病(VL)是一种病死率高、分布广泛的全身性疾病。持续评估VL的危险因素对于确保有效实施预防和控制措施至关重要。本研究回顾了美洲与VL相关的因素。方法:本系统综述通过纳入2011年7月至2024年4月间发表的横断面、队列和病例对照研究,更新了2013年的一份报告。使用随机效应荟萃分析、亚组分析和元回归模型分析VL与危险因素之间的关系。使用GRADE方法根据证据水平对研究进行分类,并评估调查质量的演变。结果:综述纳入46项研究,荟萃分析评估了21个变量。所有研究类型的结合表明,男性比女性有更大的VL机会,但这种关联仅在病例对照研究中很强且显著。虽然在病例对照研究中发现儿童和有狗或鸡/其他家禽的家庭患VL的几率较高,但在横断面和队列研究中观察到呈负相关。患VL的较高几率与经济/生活条件差、居住在有后院的住所或血清阳性狗的住所以及先前与受感染的家庭成员/亲属/邻居有过接触有关。VL与性别和年龄相关的证据水平被归类为中等,而所有其他相关的证据水平要么低,要么非常低。最近研究的方法学质量显示出积极的进展,但在选择标准和数据分析方法方面仍然存在明显的缺点。结论:虽然有症状的VL在男性和儿童中发病率较高,但两组之间感染的可能性相似。没有足够的证据支持这样的说法,即在住所有狗或家禽会增加患VL的机会。然而,社会经济和生活条件以及人类和犬类VL的既往发生情况是影响因素。未来的研究应该以更大的统计能力和使用分子诊断技术进行,最好是在不同的拉丁美洲国家进行队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
Infectious Diseases of Poverty INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
自引率
1.20%
发文量
368
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases of Poverty is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on addressing essential public health questions related to infectious diseases of poverty. The journal covers a wide range of topics including the biology of pathogens and vectors, diagnosis and detection, treatment and case management, epidemiology and modeling, zoonotic hosts and animal reservoirs, control strategies and implementation, new technologies and application. It also considers the transdisciplinary or multisectoral effects on health systems, ecohealth, environmental management, and innovative technology. The journal aims to identify and assess research and information gaps that hinder progress towards new interventions for public health problems in the developing world. Additionally, it provides a platform for discussing these issues to advance research and evidence building for improved public health interventions in poor settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信