Analysis of the characteristics and illness comprehension bias among Chinese patients with psycho-cardiovascular disease: a multi-centre cross-sectional survey.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zhuofei Shi, Kun Xia, Jianchao Li, Jianqi Lu, Hongping Lu, Yanli Li, Jifeng Zhang, Qilan Chen, Jing Liu, Rongjing Ding
{"title":"Analysis of the characteristics and illness comprehension bias among Chinese patients with psycho-cardiovascular disease: a multi-centre cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Zhuofei Shi, Kun Xia, Jianchao Li, Jianqi Lu, Hongping Lu, Yanli Li, Jifeng Zhang, Qilan Chen, Jing Liu, Rongjing Ding","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychological distress, such as depression and anxiety, impacts cardiovascular disease (CVD) prognosis and management. Illness comprehension is essential for effective treatment, but biases can lead to suboptimal outcomes. We explored psycho-cardiovascular disease (PCD) patient characteristics, with a specific focus on comprehension biases and treatment choices from patients' perspectives in China, to improve management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 864 PCD patients in Chinese hospitals across 11 provinces. Tools included the seven-item General Anxiety Disorder scale, the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire, and a self-designed PCD illness comprehensibility survey. We used χ<sup>2</sup> test, univariate, and multivariate logistic regression to examine patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 834 enrolled PCD patients, over 90% experienced mild to moderate anxiety and depression, yet less than 10% received treatment. 52.90% of patients had high illness comprehension. Among the high comprehension group, there were fewer labourers (19.30% vs. 26.40%; P < 0.05), fewer older individuals (39.20% vs. 46.90%; P < 0.05), and those with lower household income (15.60% vs. 30.50%; P < 0.05). A greater proportion of those in the high comprehension group lacked insurance (17.50% vs. 10.00%; P < 0.05), and they were more highly educated (42.90% vs. 32.10% with a college education). Additionally, more patients in the high comprehension group frequently received psychological consultation (24.00% vs. 5.10%; P < 0.05) and therapy (7.70% vs. 2.30%; P < 0.05). These patient groups preferred tertiary hospitals (71.66% vs. 63.33%; P < 0.05) and psycho-cardiovascular clinics (40.14% vs. 25.90%; P < 0.05). In comparison, low comprehension patients prioritised cost (32.65% vs. 46.41%; P < 0.05) and favoured a transition to community hospitals (16.55% vs. 25.38%; P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More than 90% of PCD patients in Chinese CVD departments experience mild to moderate anxiety and depression with low treatment rates. Different illness comprehension levels are associated with variations in treatment willingness, considerations, health care preferences, medication choices, and illness knowledge acquisition methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04019"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychological distress, such as depression and anxiety, impacts cardiovascular disease (CVD) prognosis and management. Illness comprehension is essential for effective treatment, but biases can lead to suboptimal outcomes. We explored psycho-cardiovascular disease (PCD) patient characteristics, with a specific focus on comprehension biases and treatment choices from patients' perspectives in China, to improve management strategies.

Methods: We enrolled 864 PCD patients in Chinese hospitals across 11 provinces. Tools included the seven-item General Anxiety Disorder scale, the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire, and a self-designed PCD illness comprehensibility survey. We used χ2 test, univariate, and multivariate logistic regression to examine patient characteristics.

Results: Of 834 enrolled PCD patients, over 90% experienced mild to moderate anxiety and depression, yet less than 10% received treatment. 52.90% of patients had high illness comprehension. Among the high comprehension group, there were fewer labourers (19.30% vs. 26.40%; P < 0.05), fewer older individuals (39.20% vs. 46.90%; P < 0.05), and those with lower household income (15.60% vs. 30.50%; P < 0.05). A greater proportion of those in the high comprehension group lacked insurance (17.50% vs. 10.00%; P < 0.05), and they were more highly educated (42.90% vs. 32.10% with a college education). Additionally, more patients in the high comprehension group frequently received psychological consultation (24.00% vs. 5.10%; P < 0.05) and therapy (7.70% vs. 2.30%; P < 0.05). These patient groups preferred tertiary hospitals (71.66% vs. 63.33%; P < 0.05) and psycho-cardiovascular clinics (40.14% vs. 25.90%; P < 0.05). In comparison, low comprehension patients prioritised cost (32.65% vs. 46.41%; P < 0.05) and favoured a transition to community hospitals (16.55% vs. 25.38%; P < 0.05).

Conclusions: More than 90% of PCD patients in Chinese CVD departments experience mild to moderate anxiety and depression with low treatment rates. Different illness comprehension levels are associated with variations in treatment willingness, considerations, health care preferences, medication choices, and illness knowledge acquisition methods.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信