Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab biosimilar in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jaime E Poquet-Jornet, Inés Ibáñez-Sala, Teresa Garrigues-Pelufo, Adrián Munilla-Das, Antonio Valdivia-Pérez, Francisco Javier Carrera-Hueso
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab biosimilar in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.","authors":"Jaime E Poquet-Jornet, Inés Ibáñez-Sala, Teresa Garrigues-Pelufo, Adrián Munilla-Das, Antonio Valdivia-Pérez, Francisco Javier Carrera-Hueso","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adalimumab biosimilar MSB11022 (Idacio®) has been approved for the same indications as its originator (Humira®), based on findings from clinical trials in plaque psoriasis. Data on its efficacy and safety in inflammatory bowel disease, however, are scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, observational study of 44 patients with inflammatory bowel disease: 30 were treated with originator adalimumab, five were directly started on MSB11022, and nine switched from originator to biosimilar adalimumab. To evaluate the effectiveness of the use of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease, both laboratory markers (fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein) and scales that measure the activity of inflammatory bowel disease using specific scales (Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI] have been used for Crohn's disease and Mayo Score for ulcerative colitis). Efficacy was evaluated by recording the adverse effects that could occur with the administration of adalimumab (original or biosimilar). The success of the switch was determined by analyzing meaningful differences in effectiveness and safety criteria. Concomitant therapy and the need for dose intensification were also analyzed. Objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of biosimilar adalimumab in adalimumab-naïve patients and patients switched from originator adalimumab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in clinical disease activity (p = 0.317) or biochemical parameters (fecal calprotectin [p = 0.445] and C-reactive protein [p = 0.661]) after the switch from the originator adalimumab to MSB11022. There was not a significant reduction in the concomitant use of corticosteroids and thiopurines (p = 0.157). No emergency room visits or hospitalizations were observed during the study period and none of the patients experienced serious adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Between originator adalimumab and biosimilar-start cohorts no differences were observed, between originator adalimumab and switch cohorts no significant differences were found either, and with the pre- and post-switch to biosimilar comparison two of the nine patients experienced adverse effects after the switch. The biosimilar showed a favorable safety profile (one patient with a serious adverse effect [rash] with biosimilar discontinued treatment) and no significant changes to clinical or biochemical parameters were observed after the switch.</p>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farma.2024.09.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adalimumab biosimilar MSB11022 (Idacio®) has been approved for the same indications as its originator (Humira®), based on findings from clinical trials in plaque psoriasis. Data on its efficacy and safety in inflammatory bowel disease, however, are scarce.

Methods: Retrospective, observational study of 44 patients with inflammatory bowel disease: 30 were treated with originator adalimumab, five were directly started on MSB11022, and nine switched from originator to biosimilar adalimumab. To evaluate the effectiveness of the use of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease, both laboratory markers (fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein) and scales that measure the activity of inflammatory bowel disease using specific scales (Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI] have been used for Crohn's disease and Mayo Score for ulcerative colitis). Efficacy was evaluated by recording the adverse effects that could occur with the administration of adalimumab (original or biosimilar). The success of the switch was determined by analyzing meaningful differences in effectiveness and safety criteria. Concomitant therapy and the need for dose intensification were also analyzed. Objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of biosimilar adalimumab in adalimumab-naïve patients and patients switched from originator adalimumab.

Results: No significant differences were observed in clinical disease activity (p = 0.317) or biochemical parameters (fecal calprotectin [p = 0.445] and C-reactive protein [p = 0.661]) after the switch from the originator adalimumab to MSB11022. There was not a significant reduction in the concomitant use of corticosteroids and thiopurines (p = 0.157). No emergency room visits or hospitalizations were observed during the study period and none of the patients experienced serious adverse effects.

Conclusions: Between originator adalimumab and biosimilar-start cohorts no differences were observed, between originator adalimumab and switch cohorts no significant differences were found either, and with the pre- and post-switch to biosimilar comparison two of the nine patients experienced adverse effects after the switch. The biosimilar showed a favorable safety profile (one patient with a serious adverse effect [rash] with biosimilar discontinued treatment) and no significant changes to clinical or biochemical parameters were observed after the switch.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信