Flexible and wireless metasurface coils for knee and elbow MRI.

IF 3.6 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Daniel M Düx, Robert Kowal, Lucas Knull, Simon Schröer, Othmar Belker, Dominik Horstmann, Moritz Gutt, Holger Maune, Oliver Speck, Frank Wacker, Bennet Hensen, Marcel Gutberlet
{"title":"Flexible and wireless metasurface coils for knee and elbow MRI.","authors":"Daniel M Düx, Robert Kowal, Lucas Knull, Simon Schröer, Othmar Belker, Dominik Horstmann, Moritz Gutt, Holger Maune, Oliver Speck, Frank Wacker, Bennet Hensen, Marcel Gutberlet","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00549-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metasurface coils (MCs) are a promising magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology. Aiming to evaluate the image quality of MCs for knee and elbow imaging, we compared signal-to-noise ratio (SNRs) obtained in standard clinical setups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Knee and elbow MRI routine sequences were applied at 1.5 T, implementing four coil scenarios: (1) 15-channel transmit/receive knee coil; (2) four-channel multipurpose coil (flex coil); (3) MC + spine coil; and (4) MC + multipurpose coil. Three regions of interest (ROIs) at different anatomical depths were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven participants (aged 28 ± 2 years; 6 males) were enrolled. In elbow MRI, the MC + spine coil demonstrated the highest SNR across all ROIs (superficial-anterior: +114%, p = 0.008; middle: +147%, p = 0.008; deep-posterior: +24%, p = 0.039) compared to the flex coil and all ROIs, except the deepest from the MC, compared to the knee coil (superficial-anterior: +28%, p = 0.016; middle: +104%, p = 0.008; deep-posterior: -1%, p = 0.531). In knee MRI, the MC + spine coil provided higher SNR compared to the flex coil, except posterior (superficial-anterior: +69%, p = 0.008; middle: +288%, p = 0.008; deep-posterior: -12%, p = 0.148) versus the knee coil, the MC + spine coil was superior in the middle but non-different in superficial pre-patellar areas and less in deep-posterior areas (superficial-anterior: -8%, p = 0.188; middle: +44%, p = 0.008; deep-posterior: -36%, p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wireless MCs exhibited great potential for knee and elbow MRI outperforming the flex coil. Future developments will improve the posterior illumination to increase its clinical value.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>MCs offer enhanced versatility, flexibility, and patient comfort. If universal MC designs can achieve image quality comparable to those of standard coils and simultaneously be utilized across multiple body areas, the technology may revolutionize future musculoskeletal MRIs.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>MCs are promising in MRI, but homogeneity is challenging depending on the design. Signal-to-noise-ratio was improved for knee and elbow imaging with slight inhomogeneous illumination. MCs could match the image quality of standard coils in both knee and elbow imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"9 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00549-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Metasurface coils (MCs) are a promising magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology. Aiming to evaluate the image quality of MCs for knee and elbow imaging, we compared signal-to-noise ratio (SNRs) obtained in standard clinical setups.

Methods: Knee and elbow MRI routine sequences were applied at 1.5 T, implementing four coil scenarios: (1) 15-channel transmit/receive knee coil; (2) four-channel multipurpose coil (flex coil); (3) MC + spine coil; and (4) MC + multipurpose coil. Three regions of interest (ROIs) at different anatomical depths were compared.

Results: Seven participants (aged 28 ± 2 years; 6 males) were enrolled. In elbow MRI, the MC + spine coil demonstrated the highest SNR across all ROIs (superficial-anterior: +114%, p = 0.008; middle: +147%, p = 0.008; deep-posterior: +24%, p = 0.039) compared to the flex coil and all ROIs, except the deepest from the MC, compared to the knee coil (superficial-anterior: +28%, p = 0.016; middle: +104%, p = 0.008; deep-posterior: -1%, p = 0.531). In knee MRI, the MC + spine coil provided higher SNR compared to the flex coil, except posterior (superficial-anterior: +69%, p = 0.008; middle: +288%, p = 0.008; deep-posterior: -12%, p = 0.148) versus the knee coil, the MC + spine coil was superior in the middle but non-different in superficial pre-patellar areas and less in deep-posterior areas (superficial-anterior: -8%, p = 0.188; middle: +44%, p = 0.008; deep-posterior: -36%, p = 0.016).

Conclusion: Wireless MCs exhibited great potential for knee and elbow MRI outperforming the flex coil. Future developments will improve the posterior illumination to increase its clinical value.

Relevance statement: MCs offer enhanced versatility, flexibility, and patient comfort. If universal MC designs can achieve image quality comparable to those of standard coils and simultaneously be utilized across multiple body areas, the technology may revolutionize future musculoskeletal MRIs.

Key points: MCs are promising in MRI, but homogeneity is challenging depending on the design. Signal-to-noise-ratio was improved for knee and elbow imaging with slight inhomogeneous illumination. MCs could match the image quality of standard coils in both knee and elbow imaging.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用于膝关节和肘关节磁共振成像的灵活无线元表面线圈。
背景:超表面线圈(MCs)是一种很有前途的磁共振成像技术。为了评估MCs用于膝关节和肘部成像的图像质量,我们比较了标准临床设置中获得的信噪比(SNRs)。方法:膝关节和肘部MRI常规序列在1.5 T时应用,实现四种线圈场景:(1)15通道发送/接收膝关节线圈;(2)四通道多用途线圈(挠性线圈);(3) MC +脊柱线圈;(4) MC +多用途线圈。比较了不同解剖深度的三个感兴趣区域(roi)。结果:7例受试者(年龄28±2岁;6名男性)入组。在肘部MRI中,MC +脊柱线圈在所有roi中显示出最高的信噪比(表前:+114%,p = 0.008;中间:+147%,p = 0.008;与膝关节线圈相比(浅前:+28%,p = 0.016),深后:+24%,p = 0.039;中间:+104%,p = 0.008;深后:-1%,p = 0.531)。在膝关节MRI中,MC +脊柱线圈比屈曲线圈提供了更高的信噪比,除了后侧(浅前侧:+69%,p = 0.008;中间:+288%,p = 0.008;深后路:-12%,p = 0.148)与膝圈相比,MC +脊柱圈在中间位置优越,但在髌前浅表区域无差异,在深后路区域较差(浅前路:-8%,p = 0.188;中间:+44%,p = 0.008;后深:-36%,p = 0.016)。结论:无线mc在膝关节和肘部MRI上表现出比弯曲线圈更大的潜力。未来的发展将改进后路照明以增加其临床价值。相关性声明:mc提供了增强的通用性、灵活性和患者舒适度。如果通用MC设计能够达到与标准线圈相当的图像质量,并同时用于多个身体区域,该技术可能会彻底改变未来的肌肉骨骼mri。重点:MCs在MRI中很有前途,但根据设计的不同,同质性是具有挑战性的。在轻度光照不均匀的情况下,提高了膝关节和肘部成像的信噪比。MCs在膝关节和肘部成像中均能达到标准线圈的成像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信