CompositIA: an open-source automated quantification tool for body composition scores from thoraco-abdominal CT scans.

IF 3.6 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Raffaella Fiamma Cabini, Andrea Cozzi, Svenja Leu, Benedikt Thelen, Rolf Krause, Filippo Del Grande, Diego Ulisse Pizzagalli, Stefania Maria Rita Rizzo
{"title":"CompositIA: an open-source automated quantification tool for body composition scores from thoraco-abdominal CT scans.","authors":"Raffaella Fiamma Cabini, Andrea Cozzi, Svenja Leu, Benedikt Thelen, Rolf Krause, Filippo Del Grande, Diego Ulisse Pizzagalli, Stefania Maria Rita Rizzo","doi":"10.1186/s41747-025-00552-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Body composition scores allow for quantifying the volume and physical properties of specific tissues. However, their manual calculation is time-consuming and prone to human error. This study aims to develop and validate CompositIA, an automated, open-source pipeline for quantifying body composition scores from thoraco-abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective dataset of 205 contrast-enhanced thoraco-abdominal CT examinations was used for training, while 54 scans from a publicly available dataset were used for independent testing. Two radiology residents performed manual segmentation, identifying the centers of the L1 and L3 vertebrae and segmenting the corresponding axial slices. MultiResUNet was used to identify CT slices intersecting the L1 and L3 vertebrae, and its performance was evaluated using the mean absolute error (MAE). Two U-nets were used to segment the axial slices, with performance evaluated through the volumetric Dice similarity coefficient (vDSC). CompositIA's performance in quantifying body composition indices was assessed using mean percentage relative error (PRE), regression, and Bland-Altman analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the independent dataset, CompositIA achieved a MAE of about 5 mm in detecting slices intersecting the L1 and L3 vertebrae, with a MAE < 10 mm in at least 85% of cases and a vDSC greater than 0.85 in segmenting axial slices. Regression and Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated a strong linear relationship and good agreement between automated and manual scores (p values < 0.001 for all indices), with mean PREs ranging from 5.13% to 15.18%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CompositIA facilitated the automated quantification of body composition scores, achieving high precision in independent testing.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>CompositIA is an automated, open-source pipeline for quantifying body composition indices from CT scans, simplifying clinical assessments, and expanding their applicability.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Manual body composition assessment from CTs is time-consuming and prone to errors. CompositIA was trained on 205 CT scans and tested on 54 scans. CompositIA demonstrated mean percentage relative errors under 15% compared to manual indices. CompositIA simplifies body composition assessment through an artificial intelligence-driven and open-source pipeline.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"9 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-025-00552-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Body composition scores allow for quantifying the volume and physical properties of specific tissues. However, their manual calculation is time-consuming and prone to human error. This study aims to develop and validate CompositIA, an automated, open-source pipeline for quantifying body composition scores from thoraco-abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans.

Methods: A retrospective dataset of 205 contrast-enhanced thoraco-abdominal CT examinations was used for training, while 54 scans from a publicly available dataset were used for independent testing. Two radiology residents performed manual segmentation, identifying the centers of the L1 and L3 vertebrae and segmenting the corresponding axial slices. MultiResUNet was used to identify CT slices intersecting the L1 and L3 vertebrae, and its performance was evaluated using the mean absolute error (MAE). Two U-nets were used to segment the axial slices, with performance evaluated through the volumetric Dice similarity coefficient (vDSC). CompositIA's performance in quantifying body composition indices was assessed using mean percentage relative error (PRE), regression, and Bland-Altman analyses.

Results: On the independent dataset, CompositIA achieved a MAE of about 5 mm in detecting slices intersecting the L1 and L3 vertebrae, with a MAE < 10 mm in at least 85% of cases and a vDSC greater than 0.85 in segmenting axial slices. Regression and Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated a strong linear relationship and good agreement between automated and manual scores (p values < 0.001 for all indices), with mean PREs ranging from 5.13% to 15.18%.

Conclusion: CompositIA facilitated the automated quantification of body composition scores, achieving high precision in independent testing.

Relevance statement: CompositIA is an automated, open-source pipeline for quantifying body composition indices from CT scans, simplifying clinical assessments, and expanding their applicability.

Key points: Manual body composition assessment from CTs is time-consuming and prone to errors. CompositIA was trained on 205 CT scans and tested on 54 scans. CompositIA demonstrated mean percentage relative errors under 15% compared to manual indices. CompositIA simplifies body composition assessment through an artificial intelligence-driven and open-source pipeline.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

CompositIA:一个开源的自动量化工具,用于从胸腹CT扫描中获得身体成分评分。
背景:身体成分评分可以量化特定组织的体积和物理性质。然而,他们的人工计算非常耗时,而且容易出现人为错误。本研究旨在开发和验证CompositIA,这是一个自动化的开源管道,用于量化胸腹计算机断层扫描(CT)的身体成分评分。方法:使用205个对比增强胸腹CT检查的回顾性数据集进行训练,同时使用来自公开数据集的54个扫描进行独立测试。两名放射科住院医师进行手工分割,识别L1和L3椎体的中心并分割相应的轴向切片。使用MultiResUNet识别L1和L3椎体相交的CT切片,并使用平均绝对误差(MAE)评估其性能。使用两个u型网对轴向切片进行分割,并通过体积骰子相似系数(vDSC)对性能进行评估。使用平均百分比相对误差(PRE)、回归和Bland-Altman分析评估CompositIA在量化身体成分指数方面的表现。结果:在独立数据集上,CompositIA在检测L1和L3椎体相交的切片时获得了约5 mm的MAE。结论:CompositIA促进了身体成分评分的自动化量化,在独立测试中获得了较高的精度。相关声明:CompositIA是一个自动化的开源管道,用于量化CT扫描的身体成分指数,简化临床评估,并扩大其适用性。重点:从ct中手动评估身体成分耗时且容易出错。CompositIA接受了205次CT扫描的训练,并在54次扫描中进行了测试。与手工指数相比,复合指数的平均相对误差在15%以下。CompositIA通过人工智能驱动的开源管道简化了身体成分评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信