Comparison of the effect of medium-chain fatty acids and long-chain fatty acids on postprandial appetite and lipemia: a randomised crossover trial.

IF 3.3 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Pub Date : 2024-12-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjnph-2024-001029
Ruaa Jadallah, Shatha S Hammad
{"title":"Comparison of the effect of medium-chain fatty acids and long-chain fatty acids on postprandial appetite and lipemia: a randomised crossover trial.","authors":"Ruaa Jadallah, Shatha S Hammad","doi":"10.1136/bmjnph-2024-001029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postprandial lipemia (PPL) has been recognised as a cardiovascular disease risk factor. Appetite and PPL can be influenced by the length of saturated fatty acids (FAs). Thus, this study aims to investigate if different FA chain lengths have different impacts on appetite and PPL in healthy volunteers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a randomised crossover single-blinded intervention study of 20 healthy adults. Coconut oil and palm oil were consumed in the form of biscuits. Blood serum samples were withdrawn after an overnight fast and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours after eating the test meals and examined for blood lipid profile (total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglycerides (TG)), while Friedewald's equation was used to calculate low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Visual analogue scales were used by participants to rate their appetites, and an ad libitum meal was weighed to determine the energy intake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The net area under the curve of TG and TC following the coconut oil were significantly lower than following the palm oil (<i>P</i> value ≤0.05). In the mean of the change in TC, LDL and HDL from the baseline, a significant difference was found after 6 hours of eating the biscuits (<i>P</i> value ≤0.05). The perceptions of hunger and fullness did not significantly differ between the two types of FAs. Also, the energy and macronutrient intakes were not significantly different after the two types of oil, neither at the ad libitum meal nor on the day following the treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The selection of FA chain length may influence PPL, and thus cardiovascular disease risk in a way that is functionally significant. However, this study detected no influence of FA chain length on appetite up to 40 hours post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05539742.</p>","PeriodicalId":36307,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","volume":"7 2","pages":"e001029"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2024-001029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postprandial lipemia (PPL) has been recognised as a cardiovascular disease risk factor. Appetite and PPL can be influenced by the length of saturated fatty acids (FAs). Thus, this study aims to investigate if different FA chain lengths have different impacts on appetite and PPL in healthy volunteers.

Methods: This is a randomised crossover single-blinded intervention study of 20 healthy adults. Coconut oil and palm oil were consumed in the form of biscuits. Blood serum samples were withdrawn after an overnight fast and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours after eating the test meals and examined for blood lipid profile (total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglycerides (TG)), while Friedewald's equation was used to calculate low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Visual analogue scales were used by participants to rate their appetites, and an ad libitum meal was weighed to determine the energy intake.

Results: The net area under the curve of TG and TC following the coconut oil were significantly lower than following the palm oil (P value ≤0.05). In the mean of the change in TC, LDL and HDL from the baseline, a significant difference was found after 6 hours of eating the biscuits (P value ≤0.05). The perceptions of hunger and fullness did not significantly differ between the two types of FAs. Also, the energy and macronutrient intakes were not significantly different after the two types of oil, neither at the ad libitum meal nor on the day following the treatments.

Conclusion: The selection of FA chain length may influence PPL, and thus cardiovascular disease risk in a way that is functionally significant. However, this study detected no influence of FA chain length on appetite up to 40 hours post-treatment.

Trial registration number: NCT05539742.

中链脂肪酸和长链脂肪酸对餐后食欲和血脂影响的比较:一项随机交叉试验
背景:餐后脂血症(PPL)已被认为是心血管疾病的危险因素。饱和脂肪酸(FAs)长度可影响食欲和PPL。因此,本研究旨在探讨不同脂肪酸链长度对健康志愿者食欲和PPL的影响。方法:这是一项20名健康成人的随机交叉单盲干预研究。椰子油和棕榈油以饼干的形式被食用。空腹过夜后及进食试验餐后1、2、4、6小时抽取血清,检测血脂(总胆固醇(TC)、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)、甘油三酯(TG)),采用弗里德瓦尔德方程计算低密度脂蛋白(LDL)。参与者使用视觉模拟量表来评估他们的食欲,并称重随意用餐以确定能量摄入量。结果:椰子油处理后TG和TC曲线下净面积显著低于棕榈油处理后(P值≤0.05)。在TC、LDL和HDL与基线的平均变化中,吃饼干6小时后差异有统计学意义(P值≤0.05)。两种类型的脂肪酸对饥饿感和饱腹感的感知没有显著差异。两种油脂处理后的能量和常量营养素摄取量无显著差异,随意餐时和处理后第1天均无显著差异。结论:脂肪酸链长度的选择可能影响PPL,从而在一定程度上影响心血管疾病的风险。然而,本研究发现FA链长度在治疗后40小时内对食欲没有影响。试验注册号:NCT05539742。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信