Efficacy of oral irrigators compared to other interdental aids for managing peri-implant diseases: a systematic review.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Gargi Gandhi, Bhoomika Sai Laxmi Masanam, Ananya Sudhakaran Nair, Nidhi Semani, Aditi Chopra, Venkitachalam Ramanarayanan
{"title":"Efficacy of oral irrigators compared to other interdental aids for managing peri-implant diseases: a systematic review.","authors":"Gargi Gandhi, Bhoomika Sai Laxmi Masanam, Ananya Sudhakaran Nair, Nidhi Semani, Aditi Chopra, Venkitachalam Ramanarayanan","doi":"10.1038/s41405-025-00301-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Peri-implant diseases (peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis) are inflammatory conditions that affect the peri-implant tissues and are induced by microbial biofilms (dental plaque) formed around the implant. Removal of biofilm is the fundamental step in managing peri-implant diseases. Interdental cleaning aids such as interdental brush, unitufted brush, or oral irrigation along with regular toothbrushing are recommended for effective plaque control around implants. The present systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of home use of oral irrigators compared to other plaque control methods for managing peri-implant diseases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This systematic review has been prepared using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA) checklist. Five databases were searched using the following keywords: \"Peri-implantitis\" OR Periimplantitis OR \"Peri-implant disease\" OR \"Peri-implant Mucositis\" AND \"Oral irrigation\" OR \"Oral Irrigator\" OR Waterpik OR \"Interdental irrigation\" OR \"Oral Spray\" OR \"Oral Irrigants\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Oral irrigator along with mechanical brushing was found to be more effective than mechanical brushing alone in reducing the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and bleeding on probing (BOP). No statistically significant difference in improvement in quality of life and patient satisfaction with regard to comfort and ease of use was noted upon using mechanical toothbrushing alone and an oral irrigator. Implant sites where an oral irrigator was used showed more reduction in BOP (81.8% vs 33.35%) compared to sites where the floss was used (P = 0.0018). The levels of the red and orange complex bacteria in the peri-implant biofilm were lower with the use of an oral irrigator than with toothbrushing alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oral irrigators along with toothbrushing were found to be more effective in removing microbial plaque around implants and controlling peri-implant inflammation compared to mechanical brushing alone. The reduction in BOP was better with the use of oral irrigation compared to floss and interdental brush.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11779913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-025-00301-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Peri-implant diseases (peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis) are inflammatory conditions that affect the peri-implant tissues and are induced by microbial biofilms (dental plaque) formed around the implant. Removal of biofilm is the fundamental step in managing peri-implant diseases. Interdental cleaning aids such as interdental brush, unitufted brush, or oral irrigation along with regular toothbrushing are recommended for effective plaque control around implants. The present systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of home use of oral irrigators compared to other plaque control methods for managing peri-implant diseases.

Method: This systematic review has been prepared using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA) checklist. Five databases were searched using the following keywords: "Peri-implantitis" OR Periimplantitis OR "Peri-implant disease" OR "Peri-implant Mucositis" AND "Oral irrigation" OR "Oral Irrigator" OR Waterpik OR "Interdental irrigation" OR "Oral Spray" OR "Oral Irrigants".

Results: Oral irrigator along with mechanical brushing was found to be more effective than mechanical brushing alone in reducing the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and bleeding on probing (BOP). No statistically significant difference in improvement in quality of life and patient satisfaction with regard to comfort and ease of use was noted upon using mechanical toothbrushing alone and an oral irrigator. Implant sites where an oral irrigator was used showed more reduction in BOP (81.8% vs 33.35%) compared to sites where the floss was used (P = 0.0018). The levels of the red and orange complex bacteria in the peri-implant biofilm were lower with the use of an oral irrigator than with toothbrushing alone.

Conclusion: Oral irrigators along with toothbrushing were found to be more effective in removing microbial plaque around implants and controlling peri-implant inflammation compared to mechanical brushing alone. The reduction in BOP was better with the use of oral irrigation compared to floss and interdental brush.

口腔冲洗器与其他牙间辅助设备治疗种植体周围疾病的疗效比较:一项系统综述。
目的:种植体周围疾病(种植体周围粘膜炎和种植体周围炎)是影响种植体周围组织的炎症性疾病,由种植体周围形成的微生物生物膜(牙菌斑)引起。去除生物膜是处理种植体周围疾病的基本步骤。为了有效控制种植体周围的菌斑,建议使用牙间清洁辅助工具,如牙间刷、统一刷或口腔冲洗,同时定期刷牙。本系统综述旨在评估家庭使用口腔冲洗器与其他菌斑控制方法相比,在处理种植体周围疾病方面的疗效。方法:本系统评价采用系统评价和荟萃分析方案首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单编制。使用以下关键词检索5个数据库:“种植周炎”或“种植周炎”或“种植周病”或“种植周黏膜炎”和“口腔冲洗”或“口腔冲洗器”或Waterpik或“牙间冲洗”或“口腔喷雾剂”或“口腔冲洗剂”。结果:口腔冲洗器联合机械刷牙在降低牙菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)和探诊出血(BOP)方面比单独机械刷牙更有效。单独使用机械牙刷和使用口腔冲洗器在改善生活质量和患者满意度方面没有统计学上的显著差异。与使用牙线的位置相比,使用口腔冲洗器的种植位置显示出更多的BOP降低(81.8% vs 33.35%) (P = 0.0018)。使用口腔冲洗器时,种植体周围生物膜中红色和橙色复合细菌的水平低于单独刷牙时。结论:口腔冲洗器联合刷牙在清除种植体周围微生物菌斑和控制种植体周围炎症方面比单纯机械刷牙更有效。与使用牙线和牙间刷相比,使用口腔冲洗法降低BOP效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信