Oxytocin Amplifies Negative Response to Ambiguity in Adolescent Females With and Without Eating Disorders

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Victoria Burmester, Emerie Sheridan, Nikita Catalina Julius, Jordan Elliott, Olivia Thackeray, Dasha Nicholls
{"title":"Oxytocin Amplifies Negative Response to Ambiguity in Adolescent Females With and Without Eating Disorders","authors":"Victoria Burmester,&nbsp;Emerie Sheridan,&nbsp;Nikita Catalina Julius,&nbsp;Jordan Elliott,&nbsp;Olivia Thackeray,&nbsp;Dasha Nicholls","doi":"10.1002/erv.3167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Eating disorders (ED) typically emerge in adolescence, a critical period for brain development and peer bonding. Interpersonal difficulties—particularly social anxiety—frequently co-occur with ED. Oxytocin is a neuropeptide that modulates social cognition and linked to prosocial effects. To date, no study has investigated oxytocin's effects on negative interpretation bias toward ambiguous information in adolescents with ED.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-eight female adolescents aged 16 to 17 years with and without EDs took part in a placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomised, crossover trial investigating the effects of 24 IU intranasal oxytocin on negative interpretations of ambiguous scenarios. Participants and controls were tested twice, approximately one week apart.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Contrary to hypothesis, oxytocin increased negative interpretations overall (<i>p</i> = 0.019, large effect). Adolescent females with AN or BN made more negative interpretations than controls when presented with ambiguous information. There was no group effect for those who reached or did not reach threshold on an autism screen.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study suggests adolescents with EDs interpret ambiguous information more negatively than controls and that oxytocin administration amplifies negative responses to ambiguity in adolescent females, including in controls. Research tools that effectively identify these biases would help to widen the scope of ED treatments for adolescents.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48117,"journal":{"name":"European Eating Disorders Review","volume":"33 4","pages":"691-699"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/erv.3167","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eating Disorders Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/erv.3167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Eating disorders (ED) typically emerge in adolescence, a critical period for brain development and peer bonding. Interpersonal difficulties—particularly social anxiety—frequently co-occur with ED. Oxytocin is a neuropeptide that modulates social cognition and linked to prosocial effects. To date, no study has investigated oxytocin's effects on negative interpretation bias toward ambiguous information in adolescents with ED.

Methods

Forty-eight female adolescents aged 16 to 17 years with and without EDs took part in a placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomised, crossover trial investigating the effects of 24 IU intranasal oxytocin on negative interpretations of ambiguous scenarios. Participants and controls were tested twice, approximately one week apart.

Results

Contrary to hypothesis, oxytocin increased negative interpretations overall (p = 0.019, large effect). Adolescent females with AN or BN made more negative interpretations than controls when presented with ambiguous information. There was no group effect for those who reached or did not reach threshold on an autism screen.

Conclusions

This study suggests adolescents with EDs interpret ambiguous information more negatively than controls and that oxytocin administration amplifies negative responses to ambiguity in adolescent females, including in controls. Research tools that effectively identify these biases would help to widen the scope of ED treatments for adolescents.

Abstract Image

催产素放大了有或没有饮食失调的青春期女性对模糊的负面反应。
目的:饮食失调(ED)通常出现在青春期,这是大脑发育和同伴关系的关键时期。人际交往困难——尤其是社交焦虑——经常与ED同时发生。催产素是一种调节社会认知并与亲社会效应相关的神经肽。到目前为止,还没有研究调查催产素对ed青少年对模糊信息的负面解释偏倚的影响。方法:48名年龄在16至17岁之间的女性青少年,有或没有ed,参加了一项安慰剂对照、双盲、随机、交叉试验,研究24 IU鼻内催产素对模糊情景的负面解释的影响。参与者和对照组分别测试了两次,间隔大约一周。结果:与假设相反,催产素总体上增加了负面解释(p = 0.019,效应大)。与对照组相比,患有AN或BN的青春期女性在面对模棱两可的信息时做出了更多的负面解释。对于那些达到或没有达到自闭症筛查阈值的人来说,没有群体效应。结论:本研究表明,与对照组相比,患有ed的青少年对模糊信息的解读更为消极,催产素的使用放大了青春期女性(包括对照组)对模糊信息的负面反应。有效识别这些偏见的研究工具将有助于扩大青少年ED治疗的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Eating Disorders Review
European Eating Disorders Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: European Eating Disorders Review publishes authoritative and accessible articles, from all over the world, which review or report original research that has implications for the treatment and care of people with eating disorders, and articles which report innovations and experience in the clinical management of eating disorders. The journal focuses on implications for best practice in diagnosis and treatment. The journal also provides a forum for discussion of the causes and prevention of eating disorders, and related health policy. The aims of the journal are to offer a channel of communication between researchers, practitioners, administrators and policymakers who need to report and understand developments in the field of eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信