Semi-quantitative scoring criteria based on multiple staining methods combined with machine learning to evaluate residual nuclei in decellularized matrix.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Regenerative Biomaterials Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/rb/rbae147
Meng Zhong, Hongwei He, Panxianzhi Ni, Can Huang, Tianxiao Zhang, Weiming Chen, Liming Liu, Changfeng Wang, Xin Jiang, Linyun Pu, Tun Yuan, Jie Liang, Yujiang Fan, Xingdong Zhang
{"title":"Semi-quantitative scoring criteria based on multiple staining methods combined with machine learning to evaluate residual nuclei in decellularized matrix.","authors":"Meng Zhong, Hongwei He, Panxianzhi Ni, Can Huang, Tianxiao Zhang, Weiming Chen, Liming Liu, Changfeng Wang, Xin Jiang, Linyun Pu, Tun Yuan, Jie Liang, Yujiang Fan, Xingdong Zhang","doi":"10.1093/rb/rbae147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The detection of residual nuclei in decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) biomaterials is critical for ensuring their quality and biocompatibility. However, current evaluation methods have limitations in addressing impurity interference and providing intelligent analysis. In this study, we utilized four staining techniques-hematoxylin-eosin staining, acetocarmine staining, the Feulgen reaction and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining-to detect residual nuclei in dECM biomaterials. Each staining method was quantitatively evaluated across multiple parameters, including area, perimeter and grayscale values, to establish a semi-quantitative scoring system for residual nuclei. These quantitative data were further employed as learning indicators in machine learning models designed to automatically identify residual nuclei. The experimental results demonstrated that no single staining method alone could accurately differentiate between nuclei and impurities. In this study, a semi-quantitative scoring table was developed. With this table, the accuracy of determining whether a single suspicious point is a cell nucleus has reached over 98%. By combining four staining methods, false positives caused by impurity contamination were eliminated. The automatic recognition model trained based on nuclear parameter features reached the optimal index of the model after several iterations of training in 172 epochs. The trained artificial intelligence model achieved a recognition accuracy of over 90% for detecting residual nuclei. The use of multidimensional parameters, integrated with machine learning, significantly improved the accuracy of identifying nuclear residues in dECM slices. This approach provides a more reliable and objective method for evaluating dECM biomaterials, while also increasing detection efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":20929,"journal":{"name":"Regenerative Biomaterials","volume":"12 ","pages":"rbae147"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regenerative Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbae147","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The detection of residual nuclei in decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) biomaterials is critical for ensuring their quality and biocompatibility. However, current evaluation methods have limitations in addressing impurity interference and providing intelligent analysis. In this study, we utilized four staining techniques-hematoxylin-eosin staining, acetocarmine staining, the Feulgen reaction and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining-to detect residual nuclei in dECM biomaterials. Each staining method was quantitatively evaluated across multiple parameters, including area, perimeter and grayscale values, to establish a semi-quantitative scoring system for residual nuclei. These quantitative data were further employed as learning indicators in machine learning models designed to automatically identify residual nuclei. The experimental results demonstrated that no single staining method alone could accurately differentiate between nuclei and impurities. In this study, a semi-quantitative scoring table was developed. With this table, the accuracy of determining whether a single suspicious point is a cell nucleus has reached over 98%. By combining four staining methods, false positives caused by impurity contamination were eliminated. The automatic recognition model trained based on nuclear parameter features reached the optimal index of the model after several iterations of training in 172 epochs. The trained artificial intelligence model achieved a recognition accuracy of over 90% for detecting residual nuclei. The use of multidimensional parameters, integrated with machine learning, significantly improved the accuracy of identifying nuclear residues in dECM slices. This approach provides a more reliable and objective method for evaluating dECM biomaterials, while also increasing detection efficiency.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Regenerative Biomaterials
Regenerative Biomaterials Materials Science-Biomaterials
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
16.40%
发文量
92
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Regenerative Biomaterials is an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest advances in biomaterials and regenerative medicine. The journal provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, reviews, clinical case reports, and commentaries on the topics relevant to the development of advanced regenerative biomaterials concerning novel regenerative technologies and therapeutic approaches for the regeneration and repair of damaged tissues and organs. The interactions of biomaterials with cells and tissue, especially with stem cells, will be of particular focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信