Understanding the unique patient-causal singularism and patient reported outcomes.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Quality of Life Research Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1007/s11136-025-03905-2
K A Meadows, M Reaney
{"title":"Understanding the unique patient-causal singularism and patient reported outcomes.","authors":"K A Meadows, M Reaney","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-03905-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) now play a significant role in randomized control trials (RCTs) providing the basis for efficacy or safety endpoints. Most PROM data is quantitative and is summarized at the group level. Whilst PROM data is informative in providing the aggregated patient perspective on disease and interventions, it provides little information about the patients' individual experiences. For this, qualitative 'case study' research is needed. However, qualitative case-study research has traditionally not been considered as robust for establishing causal inference due to its singular nature and lack of quantifiable findings. The focus of this paper was to advance a proposal as to how to produce a single mixed-methods case analysis of an individual's experiences with treatment from PROM and narrative data that can be used in causal inference research; so-called \"Causal singularism\".</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":"1221-1231"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-03905-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) now play a significant role in randomized control trials (RCTs) providing the basis for efficacy or safety endpoints. Most PROM data is quantitative and is summarized at the group level. Whilst PROM data is informative in providing the aggregated patient perspective on disease and interventions, it provides little information about the patients' individual experiences. For this, qualitative 'case study' research is needed. However, qualitative case-study research has traditionally not been considered as robust for establishing causal inference due to its singular nature and lack of quantifiable findings. The focus of this paper was to advance a proposal as to how to produce a single mixed-methods case analysis of an individual's experiences with treatment from PROM and narrative data that can be used in causal inference research; so-called "Causal singularism".

理解独特的患者-因果单一性和患者报告的结果。
患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)现在在随机对照试验(rct)中发挥着重要作用,为疗效或安全性终点提供了基础。大多数PROM数据是定量的,并在组水平上进行总结。虽然PROM数据在提供患者对疾病和干预措施的总体观点方面提供了信息,但它提供的关于患者个人经历的信息很少。为此,需要进行定性的“案例研究”。然而,定性案例研究由于其单一的性质和缺乏可量化的发现,传统上并不被认为是建立因果推理的可靠方法。本文的重点是提出一项建议,即如何从PROM和叙事数据中对个体治疗经验进行单一混合方法的案例分析,以用于因果推理研究;所谓的“因果奇点论”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信