Assessment of Online YouTube Videos as a Source of Information and Instruction for Pulmonary Rehabilitation.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Omer A Choudhary, Jillian Dhawan, Sahar Sohrabipour, Julie Semenchuk, Tania D Silva, Megha I Masthan, Gillian C Goobie, W Darlene Reid, Jolene H Fisher, Christopher J Ryerson, Dmitry Rozenberg
{"title":"Assessment of Online YouTube Videos as a Source of Information and Instruction for Pulmonary Rehabilitation.","authors":"Omer A Choudhary, Jillian Dhawan, Sahar Sohrabipour, Julie Semenchuk, Tania D Silva, Megha I Masthan, Gillian C Goobie, W Darlene Reid, Jolene H Fisher, Christopher J Ryerson, Dmitry Rozenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) benefits individuals with chronic respiratory conditions beyond COPD; however, the quality of online resources has not been evaluated. The aims of this study were to assess the content, quality, and comprehensibility of YouTube videos that provide PR to individuals with chronic lung diseases other than COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was conducted on YouTube for videos related to PR on non-COPD conditions, with the first 350 videos screened for eligibility (2004-2024). Videos were assessed for content based on predefined scoring matrix derived from PR guidelines, evaluated for their quality using the modified DISCERN tool and Global Quality Scale (GQS), and assessed for their understandability and actionability using the Patient Education Materials and Assessment Tool. Engagement metrics including viewing rate and interaction index were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 59 videos included, there was significant heterogeneity in PR content (i.e. aerobic, strength training, flexibility, etc.). 83% of the videos were published following the onset of COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020), and 85% of the videos were not directed at specific disease states. Video quality was moderate, with median modified DISCERN and GQS of 3 IQR[3-4] and 3 IQR[2-4] out of 5, respectively. Mean understandability and actionability were above the 70% threshold. Engagement metrics revealed that median video views were 2,857 (IQR[637-10,729]), but engagement was low (1.4% IQR[1.0-2.7]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights variability in PR content and moderate quality of videos, with reasonable comprehensibility. There is a need for more standardized and disease-specific PR online video resources for non-COPD states.</p>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"107968"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107968","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) benefits individuals with chronic respiratory conditions beyond COPD; however, the quality of online resources has not been evaluated. The aims of this study were to assess the content, quality, and comprehensibility of YouTube videos that provide PR to individuals with chronic lung diseases other than COPD.

Methods: A search was conducted on YouTube for videos related to PR on non-COPD conditions, with the first 350 videos screened for eligibility (2004-2024). Videos were assessed for content based on predefined scoring matrix derived from PR guidelines, evaluated for their quality using the modified DISCERN tool and Global Quality Scale (GQS), and assessed for their understandability and actionability using the Patient Education Materials and Assessment Tool. Engagement metrics including viewing rate and interaction index were also analyzed.

Results: Of the 59 videos included, there was significant heterogeneity in PR content (i.e. aerobic, strength training, flexibility, etc.). 83% of the videos were published following the onset of COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020), and 85% of the videos were not directed at specific disease states. Video quality was moderate, with median modified DISCERN and GQS of 3 IQR[3-4] and 3 IQR[2-4] out of 5, respectively. Mean understandability and actionability were above the 70% threshold. Engagement metrics revealed that median video views were 2,857 (IQR[637-10,729]), but engagement was low (1.4% IQR[1.0-2.7]).

Conclusion: The study highlights variability in PR content and moderate quality of videos, with reasonable comprehensibility. There is a need for more standardized and disease-specific PR online video resources for non-COPD states.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory medicine
Respiratory medicine 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants. Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信