A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Analysis for Demethylation Drug: Findings from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting Database.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1159/000543519
Shupeng Chen, Jie Liu, Yao Gao, Nana Tang, Yingjian Zeng
{"title":"A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Analysis for Demethylation Drug: Findings from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting Database.","authors":"Shupeng Chen, Jie Liu, Yao Gao, Nana Tang, Yingjian Zeng","doi":"10.1159/000543519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The real-world safety profiles of the demethylating agents azacitidine and decitabine remain inadequately characterized despite their widespread clinical use. Both drugs are extensively employed for the treatment of hematologic malignancies such as myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. This study aimed to evaluate their adverse event profiles by leveraging data from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All adverse drug event (ADE) data related to azacitidine and decitabine were collected from the FAERS database from its inception through the second quarter of 2024 (Q2). After standardizing the data, four disproportionality methods were applied to evaluate the association between azacitidine, decitabine, and ADEs. The Weibull shape parameter was used to analyze the time-to-onset curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 15,538 ADEs where azacitidine was the primary suspect drug, a total of 439 preferred terms (PTs) and 2 system organ classes (SOCs) showed significant disproportionality across all four algorithms. These SOCs included infections and infestations (n = 7,328, ROR 3.78) and blood and lymphatic system disorders (n = 5,613, ROR 8.92). Compared with the azacitidine label, 52 previously unreported ADEs were identified at the PT level. Among the 3,064 ADEs where decitabine was the primary suspect drug, a total of 200 PTs and two SOCs exhibited significant disproportionality across all four algorithms. These SOCs included blood and lymphatic system disorders (n = 1,284, ROR 6.53) and surgical and medical procedures (n = 571, ROR 3.41). Compared with the decitabine label, 29 previously unreported ADEs were identified at the PT level. Furthermore, the Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) algorithm revealed that the highest IC025 values for both azacitidine and decitabine were concentrated in SOCs related to benign, malignant, and unspecified tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, using the FAERS database, we compared the real-world safety profiles of two demethylating agents, azacitidine and decitabine. The results indicate that adverse drug reactions related to these two agents are concentrated in the hematologic, respiratory, circulatory, and digestive systems, as well as in neoplasms of unspecified nature, warranting close clinical attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The real-world safety profiles of the demethylating agents azacitidine and decitabine remain inadequately characterized despite their widespread clinical use. Both drugs are extensively employed for the treatment of hematologic malignancies such as myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. This study aimed to evaluate their adverse event profiles by leveraging data from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Methods: All adverse drug event (ADE) data related to azacitidine and decitabine were collected from the FAERS database from its inception through the second quarter of 2024 (Q2). After standardizing the data, four disproportionality methods were applied to evaluate the association between azacitidine, decitabine, and ADEs. The Weibull shape parameter was used to analyze the time-to-onset curves.

Results: Among the 15,538 ADEs where azacitidine was the primary suspect drug, a total of 439 preferred terms (PTs) and 2 system organ classes (SOCs) showed significant disproportionality across all four algorithms. These SOCs included infections and infestations (n = 7,328, ROR 3.78) and blood and lymphatic system disorders (n = 5,613, ROR 8.92). Compared with the azacitidine label, 52 previously unreported ADEs were identified at the PT level. Among the 3,064 ADEs where decitabine was the primary suspect drug, a total of 200 PTs and two SOCs exhibited significant disproportionality across all four algorithms. These SOCs included blood and lymphatic system disorders (n = 1,284, ROR 6.53) and surgical and medical procedures (n = 571, ROR 3.41). Compared with the decitabine label, 29 previously unreported ADEs were identified at the PT level. Furthermore, the Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) algorithm revealed that the highest IC025 values for both azacitidine and decitabine were concentrated in SOCs related to benign, malignant, and unspecified tumors.

Conclusion: In summary, using the FAERS database, we compared the real-world safety profiles of two demethylating agents, azacitidine and decitabine. The results indicate that adverse drug reactions related to these two agents are concentrated in the hematologic, respiratory, circulatory, and digestive systems, as well as in neoplasms of unspecified nature, warranting close clinical attention.

去甲基化药物的现实世界药物警戒分析:来自FDA不良事件报告数据库的发现。
引言:去甲基化药物阿扎胞苷和地西他滨的实际安全性特征仍然不充分,尽管它们在临床广泛使用。这两种药物被广泛用于治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤,如骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)和急性髓系白血病(AML)。本研究旨在通过利用美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中的数据来评估他们的不良事件(AE)概况。方法:从FAERS数据库建立至2024年第二季度(Q2)收集与阿扎胞苷和地西他滨相关的所有药物不良事件(ADE)数据。在对数据进行标准化后,采用四种歧化方法评价阿扎胞苷、地西他滨与ADEs的相关性。采用威布尔形状参数(WSP)对发病时间曲线进行分析。结果:在15538例以阿扎胞苷为主要嫌疑药物的ade中,共有439个首选术语(PTs)和两个系统器官类别(soc)在所有四种算法中显示出显著的歧化。这些soc包括感染和侵染(n=7328, ROR 3.78)和血液和淋巴系统疾病(n=5613, ROR 8.92)。与阿扎胞苷标签相比,在PT水平上鉴定了52例先前未报道的ade。在以地西他滨为主要可疑药物的3064例ade中,共有200例PTs和2例soc在所有四种算法中表现出显著的歧化。这些soc包括血液和淋巴系统疾病(n=1284, ROR 6.53)和外科手术和医疗程序(n=571, ROR 3.41)。与地西他滨标签相比,在PT水平上鉴定了29例先前未报道的ade。此外,贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)算法显示,阿扎胞苷和地西他滨的最高IC025值集中在与良性、恶性和未明确肿瘤相关的soc中。结论:总之,使用FAERS数据库,我们比较了两种去甲基化药物阿扎胞苷和地西他滨的现实世界安全性。结果表明,与这两种药物相关的药物不良反应(adr)主要集中在血液系统、呼吸系统、循环系统和消化系统,以及未明确性质的肿瘤,值得临床密切关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信