Convergent decoupling of individual specialization and niche width during ecological release.

IF 2.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Clay F Noss, Erica Bree Rosenblum
{"title":"Convergent decoupling of individual specialization and niche width during ecological release.","authors":"Clay F Noss, Erica Bree Rosenblum","doi":"10.1007/s00442-025-05667-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trophic niche has fundamental ecological importance, but many studies consider few niche metrics and most neglect critical structuring processes. Multiple processes shape trophic niches, including inter and intra-specific competition, predation and resource diversity. These processes interact and effects vary with time and taxa. The White Sands dunefield provides an ecological gradient ideal for understanding variation in niches. We measured population niche width, trophic position and individual specialization in four lizard species across habitats over 2 years. The habitats include White Sands interior, the surrounding desert scrub, and their ecotone. We used arthropod, lizard and plant stable isotopes to quantify niches. We sampled lizard competitors, predators and prey as proxies for ecological processes. We found substantial variation in niches across populations but convergence between species. Individual specialization and population niche width were surprisingly decoupled. Specialization was highest in habitats with low species diversity (White Sands) and population niche width highest at intermediate diversity (ecotone). White Sands lizards may exhibit 'ultra partitioning'; high specialization alongside low individual niche widths. Population niche width is likely constrained within White Sands by low prey diversity. High ecotonal population niche widths may be due to fewer natural enemies than desert scrub but higher resource diversity than White Sands. Trophic position and specialization were positively correlated, suggesting stronger intraspecific competition at higher trophic levels. Prey diversity, inter and intra-specific competition, and predation all interacted to shape niches. Our results highlight the need for measuring multiple components of community structure and niches, as results are likely misleading in isolation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":"207 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05667-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trophic niche has fundamental ecological importance, but many studies consider few niche metrics and most neglect critical structuring processes. Multiple processes shape trophic niches, including inter and intra-specific competition, predation and resource diversity. These processes interact and effects vary with time and taxa. The White Sands dunefield provides an ecological gradient ideal for understanding variation in niches. We measured population niche width, trophic position and individual specialization in four lizard species across habitats over 2 years. The habitats include White Sands interior, the surrounding desert scrub, and their ecotone. We used arthropod, lizard and plant stable isotopes to quantify niches. We sampled lizard competitors, predators and prey as proxies for ecological processes. We found substantial variation in niches across populations but convergence between species. Individual specialization and population niche width were surprisingly decoupled. Specialization was highest in habitats with low species diversity (White Sands) and population niche width highest at intermediate diversity (ecotone). White Sands lizards may exhibit 'ultra partitioning'; high specialization alongside low individual niche widths. Population niche width is likely constrained within White Sands by low prey diversity. High ecotonal population niche widths may be due to fewer natural enemies than desert scrub but higher resource diversity than White Sands. Trophic position and specialization were positively correlated, suggesting stronger intraspecific competition at higher trophic levels. Prey diversity, inter and intra-specific competition, and predation all interacted to shape niches. Our results highlight the need for measuring multiple components of community structure and niches, as results are likely misleading in isolation.

生态释放过程中个体专业化与生态位宽度的收敛解耦。
营养生态位具有基本的生态学意义,但许多研究很少考虑生态位指标,大多数忽视了关键的结构过程。多种过程形成营养生态位,包括种间和种内竞争、捕食和资源多样性。这些过程相互作用,影响随时间和分类群而变化。白沙沙丘为理解生态位的变化提供了理想的生态梯度。在2年多的时间里,我们测量了四种蜥蜴在不同栖息地的种群生态位宽度、营养位置和个体专业化。栖息地包括白沙内部,周围的沙漠灌木丛和它们的过渡带。我们使用节肢动物、蜥蜴和植物的稳定同位素来量化生态位。我们对蜥蜴的竞争对手、捕食者和猎物进行采样,作为生态过程的代表。我们发现不同种群的生态位存在很大差异,但物种之间存在趋同。个体专业化和种群生态位宽度令人惊讶地解耦。物种多样性低的生境(白沙)专业化程度最高,中等多样性的生境(交错带)生态位宽度最高。白沙蜥蜴可能表现出“极度分裂”;高度专业化和低个体生态位宽度。白沙种群生态位宽度可能受到猎物多样性低的限制。生态位宽度高可能是由于天敌比荒漠灌丛少,而资源多样性比白沙高。营养位置与专业化呈正相关,表明高营养水平的种内竞争更强。猎物多样性、种间和种内竞争以及捕食者相互作用形成生态位。我们的结果强调了测量社区结构和生态位的多个组成部分的必要性,因为孤立的结果可能会产生误导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oecologia
Oecologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas: Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology, Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology. In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信