Cardiac Vagal Efficiency Is Enhanced by Percutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation in Adolescents With Nausea: Moderation by Antidepressant Drug Exposure.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jacek Kolacz, Olivia K Roath, Gregory F Lewis, Katja Karrento
{"title":"Cardiac Vagal Efficiency Is Enhanced by Percutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation in Adolescents With Nausea: Moderation by Antidepressant Drug Exposure.","authors":"Jacek Kolacz, Olivia K Roath, Gregory F Lewis, Katja Karrento","doi":"10.1111/nmo.15007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) is an effective treatment for disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), proposed to influence vagal pathways. Cardiac metrics such as respiratory sinus arrythmia (RSA) and vagal efficiency (VE) can noninvasively assess parasympathetic output. Commonly used antidepressant drugs inhibit vagal signaling and may interfere with PENFS. This study examined immediate effects of active compared to sham PENFS on cardiac vagal function in adolescents with chronic nausea with and without concurrent drug therapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants (n = 84) were randomized to active (3.2 V, 1-10 Hz) or sham PENFS within an 8-week prospective, double-blind clinical trial. Subjects underwent posture challenges to elicit a vagal response before and after PENFS device placement mid-way through the study. RSA, mean heart period (HP), and VE were calculated from electrocardiogram recordings. Exposure to antidepressant drugs was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) age was 15.61 (2.07) years (83% female). Fifty percent were treated with antidepressants. PENFS neurostimulation enhanced VE in patients without antidepressant exposure (mean increase after PENFS stimulation =7.56 [95% CI: 0.26, 14.86], d = 0.30, 17% increase) but not in those treated with antidepressants (mean change = -5.30 [95% CI:-14.28, 3.68]). Sham PENFS did not produce significant VE changes regardless of medication use (both p > 0.40). There were no significant effects on RSA or HP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acute enhancement of cardiac VE is demonstrated with PENFS in patients not exposed to chronic antidepressant drug therapy. Findings indicate that VE is a sensitive metric for rapid assessment of PENFS effects but raise concern for possible interaction or interference by standard of care medications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov #: 1064187-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e15007"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.15007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) is an effective treatment for disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), proposed to influence vagal pathways. Cardiac metrics such as respiratory sinus arrythmia (RSA) and vagal efficiency (VE) can noninvasively assess parasympathetic output. Commonly used antidepressant drugs inhibit vagal signaling and may interfere with PENFS. This study examined immediate effects of active compared to sham PENFS on cardiac vagal function in adolescents with chronic nausea with and without concurrent drug therapy.

Materials and methods: Participants (n = 84) were randomized to active (3.2 V, 1-10 Hz) or sham PENFS within an 8-week prospective, double-blind clinical trial. Subjects underwent posture challenges to elicit a vagal response before and after PENFS device placement mid-way through the study. RSA, mean heart period (HP), and VE were calculated from electrocardiogram recordings. Exposure to antidepressant drugs was recorded.

Results: The mean (SD) age was 15.61 (2.07) years (83% female). Fifty percent were treated with antidepressants. PENFS neurostimulation enhanced VE in patients without antidepressant exposure (mean increase after PENFS stimulation =7.56 [95% CI: 0.26, 14.86], d = 0.30, 17% increase) but not in those treated with antidepressants (mean change = -5.30 [95% CI:-14.28, 3.68]). Sham PENFS did not produce significant VE changes regardless of medication use (both p > 0.40). There were no significant effects on RSA or HP.

Conclusions: Acute enhancement of cardiac VE is demonstrated with PENFS in patients not exposed to chronic antidepressant drug therapy. Findings indicate that VE is a sensitive metric for rapid assessment of PENFS effects but raise concern for possible interaction or interference by standard of care medications.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov #: 1064187-2.

经皮耳神经刺激对青少年恶心患者心脏迷走神经效率的增强:抗抑郁药物暴露的调节作用。
目的:经皮神经电场刺激(PENFS)是一种有效的治疗肠脑相互作用障碍(DGBI)的方法,被认为影响迷走神经通路。心脏指标如呼吸窦性心律失常(RSA)和迷走神经效率(VE)可以无创评估副交感神经输出。常用的抗抑郁药物抑制迷走神经信号传导并可能干扰PENFS。本研究考察了在有和没有同时进行药物治疗的青少年慢性恶心患者中,主动和假性PENFS对心脏迷走神经功能的直接影响。材料和方法:在为期8周的前瞻性双盲临床试验中,参与者(n = 84)被随机分为有效(3.2 V, 1-10 Hz)或假PENFS组。受试者在PENFS装置放置之前和之后进行姿势挑战以引起迷走神经反应。根据心电图记录计算RSA、平均心期(HP)和VE。记录抗抑郁药物的使用情况。结果:平均(SD)年龄为15.61(2.07)岁,其中83%为女性。50%的人接受抗抑郁药物治疗。无抗抑郁药物暴露患者的PENFS神经刺激可增强VE (PENFS刺激后平均增加7.56 [95% CI: 0.26, 14.86], d = 0.30,增加17%),但接受抗抑郁药物治疗的患者无此作用(平均变化= -5.30 [95% CI:-14.28, 3.68])。无论药物使用如何,假性PENFS均未产生显著的VE变化(p < 0.40)。对RSA和HP均无显著影响。结论:在未接受慢性抗抑郁药物治疗的患者中,PENFS可显示心脏VE的急性增强。研究结果表明,VE是快速评估PENFS效果的一个敏感指标,但也引起了对标准护理药物可能相互作用或干扰的关注。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov #: 1064187-2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信