The Role of Knowledge and Personal Experience in Shaping Stigma Associated With COVID-19 and Mental Illness.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Psychiatry Investigation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.30773/pi.2024.0264
Ji-Min Yoo, Ju-Wan Kim, Seon-Young Kim, Seunghyong Ryu, Ju-Yeon Lee, Sook-In Jung, Jae-Min Kim, Sung-Wan Kim
{"title":"The Role of Knowledge and Personal Experience in Shaping Stigma Associated With COVID-19 and Mental Illness.","authors":"Ji-Min Yoo, Ju-Wan Kim, Seon-Young Kim, Seunghyong Ryu, Ju-Yeon Lee, Sook-In Jung, Jae-Min Kim, Sung-Wan Kim","doi":"10.30773/pi.2024.0264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Stigma influences perceptions of mental illness and novel diseases like coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), often impeding healthcare access despite advancements in medical treatment. This study compares the stigma associated with COVID-19 and mental illness to identify factors that could help reduce stigma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was conducted in May 2023 among 1,500 participants aged 19 to 65 in South Korea, using a panel from Embrain, an online survey service. The survey assessed stigma and distress related to COVID-19 and mental illness using a validated questionnaire. It collected demographic and clinical data, evaluated COVID-19-related stigma, fear, and knowledge, and measured prejudice and attitudes toward psychiatric treatment. Personality traits were assessed using the Big Five Inventory (BFI)-10. Factors significantly associated with stigma scores were entered into linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>COVID-19-related stigma scores were significantly negatively correlated with knowledge of COVID-19 and positively correlated with fear of infection and age. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection had significantly lower scores on COVID-19-related stigma. Similarly, mental illness stigma was negatively correlated with knowledge of psychiatric treatment and positively correlated with age, as well as conscientiousness and neuroticism in the BFI. Personal experience with individuals with mental illness was associated with significantly lower stigma scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that the mechanism-making stigma was similar in cases of traditional mental illness and a novel infectious disease. Both cognitive and experiential factors influence stigma. Educating the public about the disease and enabling interactions with affected individuals emerge as effective strategies for stigma reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":21164,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Investigation","volume":"22 1","pages":"110-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2024.0264","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Stigma influences perceptions of mental illness and novel diseases like coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), often impeding healthcare access despite advancements in medical treatment. This study compares the stigma associated with COVID-19 and mental illness to identify factors that could help reduce stigma.

Methods: An online survey was conducted in May 2023 among 1,500 participants aged 19 to 65 in South Korea, using a panel from Embrain, an online survey service. The survey assessed stigma and distress related to COVID-19 and mental illness using a validated questionnaire. It collected demographic and clinical data, evaluated COVID-19-related stigma, fear, and knowledge, and measured prejudice and attitudes toward psychiatric treatment. Personality traits were assessed using the Big Five Inventory (BFI)-10. Factors significantly associated with stigma scores were entered into linear regression analysis.

Results: COVID-19-related stigma scores were significantly negatively correlated with knowledge of COVID-19 and positively correlated with fear of infection and age. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection had significantly lower scores on COVID-19-related stigma. Similarly, mental illness stigma was negatively correlated with knowledge of psychiatric treatment and positively correlated with age, as well as conscientiousness and neuroticism in the BFI. Personal experience with individuals with mental illness was associated with significantly lower stigma scores.

Conclusion: This study suggests that the mechanism-making stigma was similar in cases of traditional mental illness and a novel infectious disease. Both cognitive and experiential factors influence stigma. Educating the public about the disease and enabling interactions with affected individuals emerge as effective strategies for stigma reduction.

知识和个人经验在形成与COVID-19和精神疾病相关的耻辱感中的作用。
目的:污名影响人们对精神疾病和新型冠状病毒病-2019 (COVID-19)等疾病的看法,尽管医疗取得了进步,但往往阻碍人们获得医疗服务。这项研究比较了与COVID-19和精神疾病相关的耻辱感,以确定有助于减少耻辱感的因素。方法:使用在线调查服务Embrain的面板,于2023年5月在韩国对1500名年龄在19至65岁之间的参与者进行了在线调查。该调查使用经过验证的问卷评估了与COVID-19和精神疾病相关的耻辱感和痛苦。它收集了人口统计和临床数据,评估了与covid -19相关的污名、恐惧和知识,并衡量了对精神治疗的偏见和态度。人格特征是用大五量表(BFI)-10来评估的。将与病耻感得分显著相关的因素纳入线性回归分析。结果:与COVID-19相关的污名得分与COVID-19知识呈显著负相关,与感染恐惧和年龄呈正相关。有COVID-19感染史的个体在COVID-19相关耻辱感上的得分明显较低。同样,精神疾病耻感与精神治疗知识呈负相关,与年龄、尽责性和神经质呈正相关。与精神疾病患者的个人经历与较低的耻辱感得分显著相关。结论:本研究提示传统精神疾病与新型传染病的病耻感形成机制相似。认知和经验因素都对病耻感有影响。对公众进行有关疾病的教育并使其能够与受影响的个人进行互动,是减少污名的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Psychiatry Investigation is published on the 25th day of every month in English by the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association (KNPA). The Journal covers the whole range of psychiatry and neuroscience. Both basic and clinical contributions are encouraged from all disciplines and research areas relevant to the pathophysiology and management of neuropsychiatric disorders and symptoms, as well as researches related to cross cultural psychiatry and ethnic issues in psychiatry. The Journal publishes editorials, review articles, original articles, brief reports, viewpoints and correspondences. All research articles are peer reviewed. Contributions are accepted for publication on the condition that their substance has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Authors submitting papers to the Journal (serially or otherwise) with a common theme or using data derived from the same sample (or a subset thereof) must send details of all relevant previous publications and simultaneous submissions. The Journal is not responsible for statements made by contributors. Material in the Journal does not necessarily reflect the views of the Editor or of the KNPA. Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy-edited to improve readability and to ensure conformity with house style.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信