The Effect of Cryopreservation on the Bone Healing Capacity of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in a Bone Defect Model

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Kalter Hali, Stéphane Gagnon, Matthew Raleigh, Ikran Ali, Jhase Sniderman, Mansur Halai, Jeremy Hall, Emil H. Schemitsch, Aaron Nauth
{"title":"The Effect of Cryopreservation on the Bone Healing Capacity of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in a Bone Defect Model","authors":"Kalter Hali,&nbsp;Stéphane Gagnon,&nbsp;Matthew Raleigh,&nbsp;Ikran Ali,&nbsp;Jhase Sniderman,&nbsp;Mansur Halai,&nbsp;Jeremy Hall,&nbsp;Emil H. Schemitsch,&nbsp;Aaron Nauth","doi":"10.1002/jor.26051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have proven to be a highly effective cell therapy for critical-sized bone defects. Cryopreservation can enable long-term storage of EPCs, allowing their immediate availability on demand. This study compares the therapeutic potential of EPCs before and after cryopreservation in a small animal critical-sized bone defect model. Five-millimeter segmental defects were created in the right femora of Fischer 344 rats, followed by stabilization with a miniplate and screws. The animals received 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> fresh EPCs (<i>n</i> = 7) or 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> cryopreserved EPCs (<i>n</i> = 9) delivered on a gelatin scaffold. Cryopreserved EPCs were stored for 7 days at −80°C prior to thawing and loading onto the gelatin scaffold. Biweekly radiographs were taken until the animals were euthanized 10 weeks after surgery. The operated femora were then evaluated using microscopic-computed tomography (micro-CT) and biomechanical testing. All animals treated with fresh (<i>n</i> = 7/7) or cryopreserved (<i>n</i> = 9/9) EPCs achieved radiographic union at 10 weeks. Animals treated with fresh EPCs had statistically significant higher radiographic scores at 2 weeks (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) but showed no statistically significant differences thereafter (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Micro-CT analysis showed no statistically significant differences between the groups in bone volume (BV) or BV normalized to total volume (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05), with excellent bone formation in both groups. Finally, there were no differences in biomechanical outcomes between the groups (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). These results demonstrate that cryopreserved EPCs are highly effective and equivalent to fresh EPCs for healing critical-sized bone defects in a rat model of nonunion.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":"43 5","pages":"904-911"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jor.26051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have proven to be a highly effective cell therapy for critical-sized bone defects. Cryopreservation can enable long-term storage of EPCs, allowing their immediate availability on demand. This study compares the therapeutic potential of EPCs before and after cryopreservation in a small animal critical-sized bone defect model. Five-millimeter segmental defects were created in the right femora of Fischer 344 rats, followed by stabilization with a miniplate and screws. The animals received 2 × 106 fresh EPCs (n = 7) or 2 × 106 cryopreserved EPCs (n = 9) delivered on a gelatin scaffold. Cryopreserved EPCs were stored for 7 days at −80°C prior to thawing and loading onto the gelatin scaffold. Biweekly radiographs were taken until the animals were euthanized 10 weeks after surgery. The operated femora were then evaluated using microscopic-computed tomography (micro-CT) and biomechanical testing. All animals treated with fresh (n = 7/7) or cryopreserved (n = 9/9) EPCs achieved radiographic union at 10 weeks. Animals treated with fresh EPCs had statistically significant higher radiographic scores at 2 weeks (p < 0.05) but showed no statistically significant differences thereafter (p > 0.05). Micro-CT analysis showed no statistically significant differences between the groups in bone volume (BV) or BV normalized to total volume (p > 0.05), with excellent bone formation in both groups. Finally, there were no differences in biomechanical outcomes between the groups (p > 0.05). These results demonstrate that cryopreserved EPCs are highly effective and equivalent to fresh EPCs for healing critical-sized bone defects in a rat model of nonunion.

低温保存对骨缺损模型中内皮祖细胞骨愈合能力的影响。
内皮祖细胞(EPCs)已被证明是一种非常有效的细胞治疗临界大小的骨缺损。低温保存可以使EPCs长期储存,使其在需要时立即可用。本研究比较了EPCs在小动物临界尺寸骨缺损模型冷冻保存前后的治疗潜力。Fischer 344大鼠右侧股骨形成5毫米节段性缺损,随后用微型钢板和螺钉稳定。动物接受2 × 106个新鲜EPCs (n = 7)或2 × 106个冷冻保存的EPCs (n = 9)在明胶支架上递送。冷冻保存的内皮细胞在-80°C下保存7天,解冻后装入明胶支架。每两周拍摄一次x光片,直到手术后10周对动物实施安乐死。然后使用显微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)和生物力学测试对手术后的股骨进行评估。所有用新鲜EPCs (n = 7/7)或冷冻保存EPCs (n = 9/9)治疗的动物在10周时均实现x线愈合。用新鲜EPCs治疗的动物在2周时的x线评分有统计学意义(p 0.05)。Micro-CT分析显示,两组骨体积(BV)及BV与总体积的归一化比较,差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05),两组骨形成均良好。最后,两组间生物力学结果无差异(p < 0.05)。这些结果表明,在大鼠骨不连模型中,冷冻保存的EPCs对修复临界大小的骨缺损非常有效,并且与新鲜EPCs相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信