{"title":"Mechanical Characterization of Amniotic-Based Scaffolds Containing Silk Fibroin and Sodium Alginate Nanofibers","authors":"Hassan Beheshti Seresht, Parisa Akhlaghi, Sina Ashouri Sharafshadeh, Mohamad Sadegh Aghajanzadeh, Rouhollah Mehdinavaz Aghdam","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Due to its availability and biocompatibility, the human amniotic membrane (hAM) is being investigated by a large number of researchers with the goal of gaining a better understanding of the materials' mechanical behavior and structural integrity and optimizing them for various Tissue Engineering applications. In this research, biopolymers sodium alginate (SA) and silk fibroin (SF) were electrospun onto a decellularized hAM, resulting in two types of hybrid scaffolds: hAM/SF and hAM/SF/SA. The mechanical characteristics of these nanofibers were then analyzed to guide scaffold optimization for applications using these materials. Two mechanical experiments were conducted; uniaxial tension in both wet and dry configurations, and stress-relaxation tests. According to the results, the mechanical characteristics of the manufactured materials were significantly different from those of the amniotic membrane, indicating the effect of novel materials. Tensile testing in the dry condition revealed a small variation in stiffness between the amniotic membrane and the new nanofibers. Simultaneously, a significant reduction in maximum tension and stretch was observed in the aforementioned materials compared to amniotic matrices. In addition, tensile testing in a wet configuration indicated that the new nanofibers are stronger and stiffer than amniotic membrane but less stretchy, owing to the improved mechanical properties of SF, which can be considered as the membrane's or tissue's load-bearer. The addition of SF increases the stiffness and durability of the fabricated scaffold. In addition, when compared to the amniotic membrane, relaxation tests revealed significant differences in peak tension rather than equilibrium state for the novel nanofibers in wet conditions. The results of this investigation will enable us to have a comprehensive grasp of the mechanical properties of freshly created wound dressings.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":"113 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Due to its availability and biocompatibility, the human amniotic membrane (hAM) is being investigated by a large number of researchers with the goal of gaining a better understanding of the materials' mechanical behavior and structural integrity and optimizing them for various Tissue Engineering applications. In this research, biopolymers sodium alginate (SA) and silk fibroin (SF) were electrospun onto a decellularized hAM, resulting in two types of hybrid scaffolds: hAM/SF and hAM/SF/SA. The mechanical characteristics of these nanofibers were then analyzed to guide scaffold optimization for applications using these materials. Two mechanical experiments were conducted; uniaxial tension in both wet and dry configurations, and stress-relaxation tests. According to the results, the mechanical characteristics of the manufactured materials were significantly different from those of the amniotic membrane, indicating the effect of novel materials. Tensile testing in the dry condition revealed a small variation in stiffness between the amniotic membrane and the new nanofibers. Simultaneously, a significant reduction in maximum tension and stretch was observed in the aforementioned materials compared to amniotic matrices. In addition, tensile testing in a wet configuration indicated that the new nanofibers are stronger and stiffer than amniotic membrane but less stretchy, owing to the improved mechanical properties of SF, which can be considered as the membrane's or tissue's load-bearer. The addition of SF increases the stiffness and durability of the fabricated scaffold. In addition, when compared to the amniotic membrane, relaxation tests revealed significant differences in peak tension rather than equilibrium state for the novel nanofibers in wet conditions. The results of this investigation will enable us to have a comprehensive grasp of the mechanical properties of freshly created wound dressings.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats:
• original research reports
• short research and development reports
• scientific reviews
• current concepts articles
• special reports
• editorials
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.