Karin Shigenobu-Ueno, Reihi Sakamoto, Eiichiro Kanatsu, Yoshitaka Kawasoe, Tatsuro S Takahashi
{"title":"Replication across O6-methylguanine activates futile cycling of DNA mismatch repair attempts assisted by the chromatin-remodelling enzyme Smarcad1.","authors":"Karin Shigenobu-Ueno, Reihi Sakamoto, Eiichiro Kanatsu, Yoshitaka Kawasoe, Tatsuro S Takahashi","doi":"10.1093/jb/mvaf007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SN1-type alkylating reagents generate O6-methylguanine (meG) lesions that activate the mismatch repair (MMR) response. Since post-replicative MMR specifically targets the nascent strand, meG on the template strand is refractory to rectification by MMR and, therefore, can induce non-productive MMR reactions. The cycling of futile MMR attempts is proposed to cause DNA double-strand breaks in the subsequent S phase, leading to ATR-checkpoint-mediated G2 arrest and apoptosis. However, the mechanistic details of futile MMR cycling, especially how this reaction is maintained in chromatin, remain unclear. Using replication-competent Xenopus egg extracts, we herein establish an in vitro system that recapitulates futile MMR cycling in the chromatin context. The meG-T mispair, but not the meG-C pair, is efficiently targeted by MMR in our system. MMR attempts on the meG-strand result in the meG-to-A correction, whilst those on the T-strand induce iterative cycles of strand excision and resynthesis. Likewise, replication across meG generates persistent single-strand breaks on the daughter DNA containing meG. Moreover, the depletion of Smarcad1, a chromatin remodeller previously reported to facilitate MMR, impairs the retention of single-strand breaks. Our study thus provides experimental evidence that chromatin replication across meG induces futile MMR cycling that is assisted by Smarcad1.</p>","PeriodicalId":15234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"247-258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvaf007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
SN1-type alkylating reagents generate O6-methylguanine (meG) lesions that activate the mismatch repair (MMR) response. Since post-replicative MMR specifically targets the nascent strand, meG on the template strand is refractory to rectification by MMR and, therefore, can induce non-productive MMR reactions. The cycling of futile MMR attempts is proposed to cause DNA double-strand breaks in the subsequent S phase, leading to ATR-checkpoint-mediated G2 arrest and apoptosis. However, the mechanistic details of futile MMR cycling, especially how this reaction is maintained in chromatin, remain unclear. Using replication-competent Xenopus egg extracts, we herein establish an in vitro system that recapitulates futile MMR cycling in the chromatin context. The meG-T mispair, but not the meG-C pair, is efficiently targeted by MMR in our system. MMR attempts on the meG-strand result in the meG-to-A correction, whilst those on the T-strand induce iterative cycles of strand excision and resynthesis. Likewise, replication across meG generates persistent single-strand breaks on the daughter DNA containing meG. Moreover, the depletion of Smarcad1, a chromatin remodeller previously reported to facilitate MMR, impairs the retention of single-strand breaks. Our study thus provides experimental evidence that chromatin replication across meG induces futile MMR cycling that is assisted by Smarcad1.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biochemistry founded in 1922 publishes the results of original research in the fields of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Cell, and Biotechnology written in English in the form of Regular Papers or Rapid Communications. A Rapid Communication is not a preliminary note, but it is, though brief, a complete and final publication. The materials described in Rapid Communications should not be included in a later paper. The Journal also publishes short reviews (JB Review) and papers solicited by the Editorial Board.