Efficacy of surgical ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with AF undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A network meta-analysis

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ahmed K. Awad MD , Mohammed A. Elbahloul MD , Aliaa Gamal MD , Amir N. Attia MD , Sarah M. Hamed MD , Ahmed I. Elsekhary MD , Michel Pompeu Sá MD, MSc, MHBA, PhD
{"title":"Efficacy of surgical ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with AF undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A network meta-analysis","authors":"Ahmed K. Awad MD ,&nbsp;Mohammed A. Elbahloul MD ,&nbsp;Aliaa Gamal MD ,&nbsp;Amir N. Attia MD ,&nbsp;Sarah M. Hamed MD ,&nbsp;Ahmed I. Elsekhary MD ,&nbsp;Michel Pompeu Sá MD, MSc, MHBA, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia that greatly elevates the risk of stroke. This risk increases both during and after cardiac procedures, such as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There is an increasing interest in non-pharmacological treatments such as left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and surgical ablation, intending to enhance both immediate and long-term postoperative results.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the efficacy of surgical ablation (SA), LAAO, or both in patients with AF undergoing CABG.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched four electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and WOS. We analyzed data using R language and “netmeta” and “netrank” packages of meta-insight software. Pooled outcomes were reported as mean difference or risk ratio (RR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) in a random effect method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 16 studies were included with 594,312 patients included. The 30-day mortality showed a non-statistically significant difference between CABG-LAAO compared to CABG alone and CABG-SA with RR of 1.70 (95%CI 0.38–7.61) and 0.62 (95%CI 0.10–3.94). However, compared to CABG alone, CABG-SA + LAAO, CABG-LAAO, and CABG-SA had significantly lower risk of long-term mortality with RR 0.75 (95%CI 0.57–0.98), 0.78 (95%CI 0.65–0.94), and 0.73 (95%CI 0.61–0.88), respectively. CABG-SA + LAAO, CABG-LAAO, and CABG-SA reduced the risk of short-term stroke compared to CABG alone with RR of 0.73 (95%CI 0.43–1.24), 0.93 (95%CI 0.78–1.11), and 1.01 (95%CI 0.75–1.36), respectively. Moreover, only CABG-SA + LAAO and CABG-LAAO showed a statistically significant reduction in long term stroke and hospitalization due to heart failure while CABG-SA showed no statistically significant difference. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between our interventions in terms of 30-day rehospitalization, intra-aortic balloon pump support, and risk of hemorrhage.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Among patients with AF undergoing CABG, whether undergoing SA alone or LAAO alone or both showed significant clinical outcomes such as reduced risk of both short- and long-term mortality and short-term stroke.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology","volume":"85 3","pages":"Pages 177-185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0914508725000115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia that greatly elevates the risk of stroke. This risk increases both during and after cardiac procedures, such as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There is an increasing interest in non-pharmacological treatments such as left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and surgical ablation, intending to enhance both immediate and long-term postoperative results.

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of surgical ablation (SA), LAAO, or both in patients with AF undergoing CABG.

Methods

We searched four electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and WOS. We analyzed data using R language and “netmeta” and “netrank” packages of meta-insight software. Pooled outcomes were reported as mean difference or risk ratio (RR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) in a random effect method.

Results

A total of 16 studies were included with 594,312 patients included. The 30-day mortality showed a non-statistically significant difference between CABG-LAAO compared to CABG alone and CABG-SA with RR of 1.70 (95%CI 0.38–7.61) and 0.62 (95%CI 0.10–3.94). However, compared to CABG alone, CABG-SA + LAAO, CABG-LAAO, and CABG-SA had significantly lower risk of long-term mortality with RR 0.75 (95%CI 0.57–0.98), 0.78 (95%CI 0.65–0.94), and 0.73 (95%CI 0.61–0.88), respectively. CABG-SA + LAAO, CABG-LAAO, and CABG-SA reduced the risk of short-term stroke compared to CABG alone with RR of 0.73 (95%CI 0.43–1.24), 0.93 (95%CI 0.78–1.11), and 1.01 (95%CI 0.75–1.36), respectively. Moreover, only CABG-SA + LAAO and CABG-LAAO showed a statistically significant reduction in long term stroke and hospitalization due to heart failure while CABG-SA showed no statistically significant difference. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between our interventions in terms of 30-day rehospitalization, intra-aortic balloon pump support, and risk of hemorrhage.

Conclusion

Among patients with AF undergoing CABG, whether undergoing SA alone or LAAO alone or both showed significant clinical outcomes such as reduced risk of both short- and long-term mortality and short-term stroke.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of cardiology
Journal of cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese College of Cardiology is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest findings in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiology (JC) aims to publish the highest-quality material covering original basic and clinical research on all aspects of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, new diagnostic techniques, and cardiovascular imaging. JC also publishes a selection of review articles, clinical trials, short communications, and important messages and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信