Courtney R Chang, Angelo Sabag, Monique E Francois
{"title":"Low-intensity activity breaks combined with alternate day interval training mitigate cardiovascular effects of sedentary behavior.","authors":"Courtney R Chang, Angelo Sabag, Monique E Francois","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00484.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to determine whether interrupting prolonged sitting with brief bouts of light-intensity activity (ISIT), undertaking structured high-intensity interval training (HIIT), or the combination of both interventions would elicit greater cardiometabolic benefits. Seventeen healthy adults (22-50 yr) were recruited to undertake three 2-wk interventions in a random order: <i>1</i>) HIIT (6 HIIT sessions + <5,000 steps following the session and on the next day), <i>2</i>) ISIT (2.5-min light-intensity walking every hour for 12 h/day on weekdays), and <i>3</i>) HIIT + ISIT. Participants underwent a 6-day lead-in phase prior to each condition (<i>days 1-3</i>: normal activity, <i>days 4-6</i> sedentary: <5,000 steps/day). Pre- and postassessments included glycemic control (2-h postprandial glucose), endothelial function via flow-mediated dilation (FMD), cardiorespiratory fitness, and body composition. Changes in primary and secondary outcomes were assessed via repeated measures ANOVA. Eleven participants completed all conditions (8 female, 33 ± 5 yr, 23 ± 4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, habitual activity 7,156 ± 2,272 steps/day). FMD significantly improved following HIIT + ISIT when compared with ISIT (+1.04 ± 1.20%, <i>P</i> = 0.02), but there were no differences when ISIT was directly compared with HIIT. Cardiorespiratory fitness improved significantly following HIIT + ISIT when compared with ISIT (+1.88 ± 2.03 mL/kg/min, <i>P</i> = 0.01), but there were no differences when ISIT alone was compared with HIIT. There were no significant differences between groups for outcomes related to glucose control or body composition. HIIT + ISIT elicits greater improvements in cardiovascular outcomes when compared with ISIT but not HIIT. The benefits of structured exercise, such as HIIT, may go beyond those achieved by limiting sedentary behavior alone.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Although the adverse health effects of sedentary behavior are well-recognized, effective strategies for interrupting such behavior remain unclear. This study demonstrates that combining light-intensity activity breaks throughout the day with structured high-intensity exercise every other day can mitigate some of the cardiovascular consequences associated with prolonged sedentary periods in healthy young adults. Furthermore, our findings also suggest that merely incorporating regular breaks of light-intensity activity may not suffice. These results underscore the importance of regular exercise for cardiovascular health amid sedentary lifestyles.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":"799-809"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00484.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to determine whether interrupting prolonged sitting with brief bouts of light-intensity activity (ISIT), undertaking structured high-intensity interval training (HIIT), or the combination of both interventions would elicit greater cardiometabolic benefits. Seventeen healthy adults (22-50 yr) were recruited to undertake three 2-wk interventions in a random order: 1) HIIT (6 HIIT sessions + <5,000 steps following the session and on the next day), 2) ISIT (2.5-min light-intensity walking every hour for 12 h/day on weekdays), and 3) HIIT + ISIT. Participants underwent a 6-day lead-in phase prior to each condition (days 1-3: normal activity, days 4-6 sedentary: <5,000 steps/day). Pre- and postassessments included glycemic control (2-h postprandial glucose), endothelial function via flow-mediated dilation (FMD), cardiorespiratory fitness, and body composition. Changes in primary and secondary outcomes were assessed via repeated measures ANOVA. Eleven participants completed all conditions (8 female, 33 ± 5 yr, 23 ± 4 kg/m2, habitual activity 7,156 ± 2,272 steps/day). FMD significantly improved following HIIT + ISIT when compared with ISIT (+1.04 ± 1.20%, P = 0.02), but there were no differences when ISIT was directly compared with HIIT. Cardiorespiratory fitness improved significantly following HIIT + ISIT when compared with ISIT (+1.88 ± 2.03 mL/kg/min, P = 0.01), but there were no differences when ISIT alone was compared with HIIT. There were no significant differences between groups for outcomes related to glucose control or body composition. HIIT + ISIT elicits greater improvements in cardiovascular outcomes when compared with ISIT but not HIIT. The benefits of structured exercise, such as HIIT, may go beyond those achieved by limiting sedentary behavior alone.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Although the adverse health effects of sedentary behavior are well-recognized, effective strategies for interrupting such behavior remain unclear. This study demonstrates that combining light-intensity activity breaks throughout the day with structured high-intensity exercise every other day can mitigate some of the cardiovascular consequences associated with prolonged sedentary periods in healthy young adults. Furthermore, our findings also suggest that merely incorporating regular breaks of light-intensity activity may not suffice. These results underscore the importance of regular exercise for cardiovascular health amid sedentary lifestyles.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.