Assessing the Utilization of HIV Genotype Resistance Testing: Insight from Italian Infectious Diseases Units.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
A De Vito, A Bezenchek, R Scutari, L Colagrossi, G Valenti, M C Bellocchi, L Pipitò, S Ferrara, S Malandrin, M Tallarita, A Cozzi-Lepri, F Ceccherini Silberstein, S Lo Caputo, S Rusconi
{"title":"Assessing the Utilization of HIV Genotype Resistance Testing: Insight from Italian Infectious Diseases Units.","authors":"A De Vito, A Bezenchek, R Scutari, L Colagrossi, G Valenti, M C Bellocchi, L Pipitò, S Ferrara, S Malandrin, M Tallarita, A Cozzi-Lepri, F Ceccherini Silberstein, S Lo Caputo, S Rusconi","doi":"10.1016/j.jgar.2025.01.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to assess the utilization of Genotype Resistance Testing (GRT) by Infectious Diseases Units across Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted involving a questionnaire distributed to the Infectious Diseases Unit in Italy. A web-based survey using Google Forms software was utilized and spread via email or cellphone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were obtained from 101 Infectious Diseases Units. Among these centers, only seven (6.9%) reported not performing GRT at any time. Of the 94 centers performing GRT, 52 (55.3%) sent blood samples to external laboratories. Notably, only 6/35 (17.1%) small centers had internal laboratories, compared to 14/35 (40.0%) medium centers and 22/24 (91.7%) large centers (p<0.001). Most centers requested GRT for treatment-naïve individuals and all cases of virological failure. Only 24 (25.5%) requested GRT of HIVDNA before treatment changes. Regarding virological failure, most centers (38, 40.4%) requested GRT when HIV-RNA levels exceeded 200 copies/mL, while 26 (27.7%) requested it at levels exceeding 50 copies/mL. Additionally, 18 (19.1%) and 12 (12.8%) centers requested GRT at thresholds of 500 copies/mL and 1000 copies/mL, respectively. Regarding the specific GRT test used, 34 (36.2%) were unsure, while 16 (17.0%) reported using both Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Sanger methods. Furthermore, 30 (31.9%) and 14 (14.9%) centers exclusively used NGS and Sanger, respectively. Most centers reported receiving GRT results within one month (n=72, 76.6%), while 22 (23.4%) centers obtained results within two weeks. However, 22 (23.4%) centers typically experienced more than one-month delays. Finally, most participants (86, 91.5%) regarded GRT as a crucial routine test for the treatment of naïve PLWH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that most Infectious Diseases Units in Italy continue to consider GRT an essential test for newly diagnosed PLWH in clinical practice. However, the utilization of GRT on HIV-DNA remains limited. Further efforts are required to decrease turnaround time in centers experiencing prolonged delays in obtaining results.</p>","PeriodicalId":15936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2025.01.018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to assess the utilization of Genotype Resistance Testing (GRT) by Infectious Diseases Units across Italy.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving a questionnaire distributed to the Infectious Diseases Unit in Italy. A web-based survey using Google Forms software was utilized and spread via email or cellphone.

Results: Responses were obtained from 101 Infectious Diseases Units. Among these centers, only seven (6.9%) reported not performing GRT at any time. Of the 94 centers performing GRT, 52 (55.3%) sent blood samples to external laboratories. Notably, only 6/35 (17.1%) small centers had internal laboratories, compared to 14/35 (40.0%) medium centers and 22/24 (91.7%) large centers (p<0.001). Most centers requested GRT for treatment-naïve individuals and all cases of virological failure. Only 24 (25.5%) requested GRT of HIVDNA before treatment changes. Regarding virological failure, most centers (38, 40.4%) requested GRT when HIV-RNA levels exceeded 200 copies/mL, while 26 (27.7%) requested it at levels exceeding 50 copies/mL. Additionally, 18 (19.1%) and 12 (12.8%) centers requested GRT at thresholds of 500 copies/mL and 1000 copies/mL, respectively. Regarding the specific GRT test used, 34 (36.2%) were unsure, while 16 (17.0%) reported using both Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Sanger methods. Furthermore, 30 (31.9%) and 14 (14.9%) centers exclusively used NGS and Sanger, respectively. Most centers reported receiving GRT results within one month (n=72, 76.6%), while 22 (23.4%) centers obtained results within two weeks. However, 22 (23.4%) centers typically experienced more than one-month delays. Finally, most participants (86, 91.5%) regarded GRT as a crucial routine test for the treatment of naïve PLWH.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that most Infectious Diseases Units in Italy continue to consider GRT an essential test for newly diagnosed PLWH in clinical practice. However, the utilization of GRT on HIV-DNA remains limited. Further efforts are required to decrease turnaround time in centers experiencing prolonged delays in obtaining results.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of global antimicrobial resistance
Journal of global antimicrobial resistance INFECTIOUS DISEASES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance (JGAR) is a quarterly online journal run by an international Editorial Board that focuses on the global spread of antibiotic-resistant microbes. JGAR is a dedicated journal for all professionals working in research, health care, the environment and animal infection control, aiming to track the resistance threat worldwide and provides a single voice devoted to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Featuring peer-reviewed and up to date research articles, reviews, short notes and hot topics JGAR covers the key topics related to antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal and antiparasitic resistance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信