Outcomes of Zero Power Intraocular Lenses: Insights into the Keratometric Index and Axial Length.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ronald B Melles, David L Cooke, Thomas Olsen
{"title":"Outcomes of Zero Power Intraocular Lenses: Insights into the Keratometric Index and Axial Length.","authors":"Ronald B Melles, David L Cooke, Thomas Olsen","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We analyzed intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in a series of patients with a zero diopter power implant. The idea was to bypass the Estimated Lens Plane (ELP), an important variable in normal IOL calculation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Large multi-center group practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive series of patients undergoing cataract surgery after optical biometry and implantation of a zero (0.0 D) power IOL were studied. Complete biometry was performed with an optical low coherence optical biometer. The predicted refraction was calculated with and without recalibrating the axial length (AL) using a Sum-Of-Segments (SOS) approach with the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, and Olsen formulas. A ray tracing model to back-calculate the corneal power from the observed postoperative refraction and AL was also included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 52 eyes of 52 patients, mean prediction errors for the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, and the Olsen formulas were +1.48, +1.15, +0.91, +0.65, +0.15 and +0.11 D respectively using standard AL and after SOS correction of the AL the mean errors changed to +1.08, +0.75, +0.52, +0.26, -0.25, and -0.27 D respectively. The mean back-calculated corneal power was 1.25 D lower than the mean keratometer reading using the standard keratometric index of 1.3375 and corresponded to an effective index of 1.328.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The hyperopic error commonly seen in highly myopic eyes with classical thin-lens formulas is only partly corrected by SOS recalibration of the AL. We suggest the source of the residual error is an incorrect keratometric index.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We analyzed intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in a series of patients with a zero diopter power implant. The idea was to bypass the Estimated Lens Plane (ELP), an important variable in normal IOL calculation.

Setting: Large multi-center group practice.

Design: Retrospective, observational study.

Methods: A consecutive series of patients undergoing cataract surgery after optical biometry and implantation of a zero (0.0 D) power IOL were studied. Complete biometry was performed with an optical low coherence optical biometer. The predicted refraction was calculated with and without recalibrating the axial length (AL) using a Sum-Of-Segments (SOS) approach with the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, and Olsen formulas. A ray tracing model to back-calculate the corneal power from the observed postoperative refraction and AL was also included.

Results: In 52 eyes of 52 patients, mean prediction errors for the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, and the Olsen formulas were +1.48, +1.15, +0.91, +0.65, +0.15 and +0.11 D respectively using standard AL and after SOS correction of the AL the mean errors changed to +1.08, +0.75, +0.52, +0.26, -0.25, and -0.27 D respectively. The mean back-calculated corneal power was 1.25 D lower than the mean keratometer reading using the standard keratometric index of 1.3375 and corresponded to an effective index of 1.328.

Conclusions: The hyperopic error commonly seen in highly myopic eyes with classical thin-lens formulas is only partly corrected by SOS recalibration of the AL. We suggest the source of the residual error is an incorrect keratometric index.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信