{"title":"Outcomes of Zero Power Intraocular Lenses: Insights into the Keratometric Index and Axial Length.","authors":"Ronald B Melles, David L Cooke, Thomas Olsen","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We analyzed intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in a series of patients with a zero diopter power implant. The idea was to bypass the Estimated Lens Plane (ELP), an important variable in normal IOL calculation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Large multi-center group practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive series of patients undergoing cataract surgery after optical biometry and implantation of a zero (0.0 D) power IOL were studied. Complete biometry was performed with an optical low coherence optical biometer. The predicted refraction was calculated with and without recalibrating the axial length (AL) using a Sum-Of-Segments (SOS) approach with the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, and Olsen formulas. A ray tracing model to back-calculate the corneal power from the observed postoperative refraction and AL was also included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 52 eyes of 52 patients, mean prediction errors for the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, and the Olsen formulas were +1.48, +1.15, +0.91, +0.65, +0.15 and +0.11 D respectively using standard AL and after SOS correction of the AL the mean errors changed to +1.08, +0.75, +0.52, +0.26, -0.25, and -0.27 D respectively. The mean back-calculated corneal power was 1.25 D lower than the mean keratometer reading using the standard keratometric index of 1.3375 and corresponded to an effective index of 1.328.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The hyperopic error commonly seen in highly myopic eyes with classical thin-lens formulas is only partly corrected by SOS recalibration of the AL. We suggest the source of the residual error is an incorrect keratometric index.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: We analyzed intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in a series of patients with a zero diopter power implant. The idea was to bypass the Estimated Lens Plane (ELP), an important variable in normal IOL calculation.
Setting: Large multi-center group practice.
Design: Retrospective, observational study.
Methods: A consecutive series of patients undergoing cataract surgery after optical biometry and implantation of a zero (0.0 D) power IOL were studied. Complete biometry was performed with an optical low coherence optical biometer. The predicted refraction was calculated with and without recalibrating the axial length (AL) using a Sum-Of-Segments (SOS) approach with the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, and Olsen formulas. A ray tracing model to back-calculate the corneal power from the observed postoperative refraction and AL was also included.
Results: In 52 eyes of 52 patients, mean prediction errors for the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, and the Olsen formulas were +1.48, +1.15, +0.91, +0.65, +0.15 and +0.11 D respectively using standard AL and after SOS correction of the AL the mean errors changed to +1.08, +0.75, +0.52, +0.26, -0.25, and -0.27 D respectively. The mean back-calculated corneal power was 1.25 D lower than the mean keratometer reading using the standard keratometric index of 1.3375 and corresponded to an effective index of 1.328.
Conclusions: The hyperopic error commonly seen in highly myopic eyes with classical thin-lens formulas is only partly corrected by SOS recalibration of the AL. We suggest the source of the residual error is an incorrect keratometric index.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS).
JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.