A validated method for capillary phosphatidylethanol (PEth) 16:0/18:1 quantification with two different 10 µL volumetric absorptive microsample (VAMS) devices in the same set-up.
Trine N Andreassen, Marina Gule, Hilde Havnen, Olav Spigset, Ragnhild Skråstad
{"title":"A validated method for capillary phosphatidylethanol (PEth) 16:0/18:1 quantification with two different 10 µL volumetric absorptive microsample (VAMS) devices in the same set-up.","authors":"Trine N Andreassen, Marina Gule, Hilde Havnen, Olav Spigset, Ragnhild Skråstad","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkaf004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing interest for quantification of drugs in capillary blood. Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a biomarker for alcohol intake measured in whole blood, thus making it a candidate for capillary sampling. Our laboratory has been running a method for PEth quantification in venous blood since 2016 and we aimed to expand this method to also include capillary dried blood spot (DBS) samples. Two 10 µL volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) devices, Capitainer®B Vanadate and Mitra® were included in the method development and validated. Calibrators and quality controls were spiked during the automatic sample extraction without the VAMS devices present, making it possible to extract and analyze both types of VAMS samples in the same set-up. With the Mitra device all pre-established validation criteria were fulfilled in the measuring range 0.03-4.0 µM (21-2812 ng/mL), including method comparison with our venous blood method. Capitainer fulfilled all validation criteria, except for the accuracy of samples with PEth levels ≥ 0.5 µM (≥ 352 ng/mL) (deviation -17.1 to -20.5%). The correlation analysis between Capitainer and the venous blood results showed no constant bias, but an acceptable small proportional mean difference of -7.6%. Overall, the method validation results for both Capitainer and Mitra were considered acceptable. Both devices were found suitable for the analyses of PEth.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is a growing interest for quantification of drugs in capillary blood. Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a biomarker for alcohol intake measured in whole blood, thus making it a candidate for capillary sampling. Our laboratory has been running a method for PEth quantification in venous blood since 2016 and we aimed to expand this method to also include capillary dried blood spot (DBS) samples. Two 10 µL volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) devices, Capitainer®B Vanadate and Mitra® were included in the method development and validated. Calibrators and quality controls were spiked during the automatic sample extraction without the VAMS devices present, making it possible to extract and analyze both types of VAMS samples in the same set-up. With the Mitra device all pre-established validation criteria were fulfilled in the measuring range 0.03-4.0 µM (21-2812 ng/mL), including method comparison with our venous blood method. Capitainer fulfilled all validation criteria, except for the accuracy of samples with PEth levels ≥ 0.5 µM (≥ 352 ng/mL) (deviation -17.1 to -20.5%). The correlation analysis between Capitainer and the venous blood results showed no constant bias, but an acceptable small proportional mean difference of -7.6%. Overall, the method validation results for both Capitainer and Mitra were considered acceptable. Both devices were found suitable for the analyses of PEth.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation.
Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.