A validated method for capillary phosphatidylethanol (PEth) 16:0/18:1 quantification with two different 10 µL volumetric absorptive microsample (VAMS) devices in the same set-up.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Trine N Andreassen, Marina Gule, Hilde Havnen, Olav Spigset, Ragnhild Skråstad
{"title":"A validated method for capillary phosphatidylethanol (PEth) 16:0/18:1 quantification with two different 10 µL volumetric absorptive microsample (VAMS) devices in the same set-up.","authors":"Trine N Andreassen, Marina Gule, Hilde Havnen, Olav Spigset, Ragnhild Skråstad","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkaf004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing interest for quantification of drugs in capillary blood. Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a biomarker for alcohol intake measured in whole blood, thus making it a candidate for capillary sampling. Our laboratory has been running a method for PEth quantification in venous blood since 2016 and we aimed to expand this method to also include capillary dried blood spot (DBS) samples. Two 10 µL volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) devices, Capitainer®B Vanadate and Mitra® were included in the method development and validated. Calibrators and quality controls were spiked during the automatic sample extraction without the VAMS devices present, making it possible to extract and analyze both types of VAMS samples in the same set-up. With the Mitra device all pre-established validation criteria were fulfilled in the measuring range 0.03-4.0 µM (21-2812 ng/mL), including method comparison with our venous blood method. Capitainer fulfilled all validation criteria, except for the accuracy of samples with PEth levels ≥ 0.5 µM (≥ 352 ng/mL) (deviation -17.1 to -20.5%). The correlation analysis between Capitainer and the venous blood results showed no constant bias, but an acceptable small proportional mean difference of -7.6%. Overall, the method validation results for both Capitainer and Mitra were considered acceptable. Both devices were found suitable for the analyses of PEth.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing interest for quantification of drugs in capillary blood. Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a biomarker for alcohol intake measured in whole blood, thus making it a candidate for capillary sampling. Our laboratory has been running a method for PEth quantification in venous blood since 2016 and we aimed to expand this method to also include capillary dried blood spot (DBS) samples. Two 10 µL volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) devices, Capitainer®B Vanadate and Mitra® were included in the method development and validated. Calibrators and quality controls were spiked during the automatic sample extraction without the VAMS devices present, making it possible to extract and analyze both types of VAMS samples in the same set-up. With the Mitra device all pre-established validation criteria were fulfilled in the measuring range 0.03-4.0 µM (21-2812 ng/mL), including method comparison with our venous blood method. Capitainer fulfilled all validation criteria, except for the accuracy of samples with PEth levels ≥ 0.5 µM (≥ 352 ng/mL) (deviation -17.1 to -20.5%). The correlation analysis between Capitainer and the venous blood results showed no constant bias, but an acceptable small proportional mean difference of -7.6%. Overall, the method validation results for both Capitainer and Mitra were considered acceptable. Both devices were found suitable for the analyses of PEth.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信