A validated method for capillary phosphatidylethanol 16:0/18:1 quantification with two different 10-µl volumetric absorptive microsample devices in the same setup.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Trine N Andreassen, Marina Gule, Hilde Havnen, Olav Spigset, Ragnhild Bergene Skråstad
{"title":"A validated method for capillary phosphatidylethanol 16:0/18:1 quantification with two different 10-µl volumetric absorptive microsample devices in the same setup.","authors":"Trine N Andreassen, Marina Gule, Hilde Havnen, Olav Spigset, Ragnhild Bergene Skråstad","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkaf004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing interest for quantification of drugs in capillary blood. Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a biomarker for alcohol intake measured in whole blood, thus making it a candidate for capillary sampling. Our laboratory has been running a method for PEth quantification in venous blood since 2016, and we aimed to expand this method to also include capillary dried blood spot (DBS) samples. Two 10-µl volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) devices, Capitainer®B Vanadate and Mitra®, were included in the method development and validated. Calibrators and quality controls were spiked during automatic sample extraction without the VAMS devices present, making it possible to extract and analyze both types of VAMS samples in the same setup. With the Mitra device, all pre-established validation criteria were fulfilled in the measuring range of 0.03 to 4.0 µM (21-2812 ng/mL), including method comparison with our venous blood method. Capitainer fulfilled all validation criteria, except for the accuracy of samples with PEth levels ≥ 0.5 µM (≥ 352 ng/mL) (deviation -17.1% to -20.5%). The correlation analysis between Capitainer and the venous blood results showed no constant bias, but an acceptable small proportional mean difference of -7.6%. Overall, the method validation results for both Capitainer and Mitra were considered acceptable. Both devices were found to be suitable for the analyses of PEth.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"231-240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing interest for quantification of drugs in capillary blood. Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a biomarker for alcohol intake measured in whole blood, thus making it a candidate for capillary sampling. Our laboratory has been running a method for PEth quantification in venous blood since 2016, and we aimed to expand this method to also include capillary dried blood spot (DBS) samples. Two 10-µl volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) devices, Capitainer®B Vanadate and Mitra®, were included in the method development and validated. Calibrators and quality controls were spiked during automatic sample extraction without the VAMS devices present, making it possible to extract and analyze both types of VAMS samples in the same setup. With the Mitra device, all pre-established validation criteria were fulfilled in the measuring range of 0.03 to 4.0 µM (21-2812 ng/mL), including method comparison with our venous blood method. Capitainer fulfilled all validation criteria, except for the accuracy of samples with PEth levels ≥ 0.5 µM (≥ 352 ng/mL) (deviation -17.1% to -20.5%). The correlation analysis between Capitainer and the venous blood results showed no constant bias, but an acceptable small proportional mean difference of -7.6%. Overall, the method validation results for both Capitainer and Mitra were considered acceptable. Both devices were found to be suitable for the analyses of PEth.

采用两种不同的10µL体积吸收微样品(VAMS)装置,在相同的设置下,验证了毛细管磷脂酰乙醇(PEth) 16:0/18:1定量方法。
对毛细管血液中药物定量的研究日益引起人们的兴趣。磷脂酰乙醇(PEth)是测量全血中酒精摄入量的生物标志物,因此使其成为毛细管取样的候选物。自2016年以来,我们的实验室一直在运行一种定量静脉血中PEth的方法,我们的目标是将这种方法扩展到包括毛细血管干血斑(DBS)样本。两种10µL体积吸收微采样(VAMS)设备,Capitainer®B Vanadate和Mitra®被纳入方法开发和验证。在没有VAMS设备的情况下,在自动样品提取过程中添加校定器和质量控制,从而可以在同一设置中提取和分析两种类型的VAMS样品。使用Mitra装置在0.03-4.0µM (21-2812 ng/mL)的测量范围内满足所有预先建立的验证标准,包括与我们的静脉血法的方法比较。除了PEth浓度≥0.5µM(≥352 ng/mL)样品的准确性(偏差-17.1至-20.5%)外,Capitainer满足所有验证标准。capainer与静脉血结果的相关分析显示没有恒定的偏倚,但可接受的小比例平均差异为-7.6%。总的来说,Capitainer和Mitra的方法验证结果被认为是可以接受的。发现这两种装置都适合于分析PEth。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信