The energetic cost of human walking as a function of uneven terrain amplitude.

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Journal of Experimental Biology Pub Date : 2025-03-15 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1242/jeb.249840
Seyed-Saleh Hosseini-Yazdi, Arthur D Kuo
{"title":"The energetic cost of human walking as a function of uneven terrain amplitude.","authors":"Seyed-Saleh Hosseini-Yazdi, Arthur D Kuo","doi":"10.1242/jeb.249840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans expend more energy walking on uneven terrain, but the amount varies across terrains. Few experimental characterizations exist, each describing terrain qualitatively without any relation to others or to flat ground. This precludes mechanistic explanation of the energy costs. Here, we show that energy costs vary smoothly and approximately quadratically as a function of terrain amplitude. We tested this with healthy adults (N=10) walking on synthetic uneven terrain with random step heights of parametrically controlled maximum amplitude (four conditions 0-0.045 m) and at four walking speeds (0.8-1.4 m s-1). Both net metabolic rate and the rate of positive work increased approximately with amplitude squared and speed cubed (R2=0.74, 0.82, respectively), as predicted by a simple walking model. The model requires work to redirect the body center of mass velocity between successive arcs described by pendulum-like legs, at proportional metabolic cost. Humans performed most of the greater work with terrain amplitude early in the single stance phase, and with speed later in stance during push-off. Work and energy rates changed with approximately linear proportionality, with a ratio or delta efficiency of 49.5% (R2=0.68). The efficiency was high enough to suggest substantial work performed passively by elastic tendon and not only by active muscle. Simple kinematic measures such as mid-swing foot clearance also increased with terrain amplitude (R2=0.65), possibly costing energy as well. Nevertheless, most of the metabolic cost of walking faster or on more uneven terrain can be explained mechanistically by the work performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.249840","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans expend more energy walking on uneven terrain, but the amount varies across terrains. Few experimental characterizations exist, each describing terrain qualitatively without any relation to others or to flat ground. This precludes mechanistic explanation of the energy costs. Here, we show that energy costs vary smoothly and approximately quadratically as a function of terrain amplitude. We tested this with healthy adults (N=10) walking on synthetic uneven terrain with random step heights of parametrically controlled maximum amplitude (four conditions 0-0.045 m) and at four walking speeds (0.8-1.4 m s-1). Both net metabolic rate and the rate of positive work increased approximately with amplitude squared and speed cubed (R2=0.74, 0.82, respectively), as predicted by a simple walking model. The model requires work to redirect the body center of mass velocity between successive arcs described by pendulum-like legs, at proportional metabolic cost. Humans performed most of the greater work with terrain amplitude early in the single stance phase, and with speed later in stance during push-off. Work and energy rates changed with approximately linear proportionality, with a ratio or delta efficiency of 49.5% (R2=0.68). The efficiency was high enough to suggest substantial work performed passively by elastic tendon and not only by active muscle. Simple kinematic measures such as mid-swing foot clearance also increased with terrain amplitude (R2=0.65), possibly costing energy as well. Nevertheless, most of the metabolic cost of walking faster or on more uneven terrain can be explained mechanistically by the work performed.

人类行走的能量消耗与不平坦地形振幅的函数关系。
人类在不平坦的地形上行走会消耗更多的能量,但不同地形消耗的能量不同。很少有实验表征存在,每一个描述地形定性没有任何关系,其他或平坦的地面。这就排除了对能源成本的机械解释。在这里,我们展示了能量成本作为地形振幅的函数平滑和近似二次变化。我们对健康成人(N=10)进行了测试,他们在合成不平坦地形上行走,随机步高为参数控制的最大振幅(四种情况0 - 0.045 m),并以四种行走速度(0.8 - 1.4 m - s-1)。通过简单的步行模型预测,净代谢率和正功率随幅度的平方和速度的立方近似增加(R2分别为0.74和0.82)。该模型需要以一定比例的代谢成本,在摆腿所描述的连续弧线之间改变身体重心的速度。人类在单站立阶段的早期完成了地形振幅较大的工作,而在蹬蹬阶段的站立后期完成了速度较大的工作。功和能近似成线性比例变化,比值或δ效率为49.5% (R2 = 0.68)。效率足够高,表明大量的工作是由弹性肌腱被动完成的,而不仅仅是由活动肌肉完成的。简单的运动学测量,如中挥杆足间隙也随着地形幅度的增加而增加(R2 = 0.65),可能也会消耗能量。然而,在更快或更不平坦的地形上行走的大部分代谢成本可以用所做的工作来机械地解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Experimental Biology is the leading primary research journal in comparative physiology and publishes papers on the form and function of living organisms at all levels of biological organisation, from the molecular and subcellular to the integrated whole animal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信