Evaluating the Benefit of a Urogynecologic Telehealth Consultation after Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kyra Bonasia, Susan Luong, Jocelyn Stairs, Aisling Clancy
{"title":"Evaluating the Benefit of a Urogynecologic Telehealth Consultation after Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury.","authors":"Kyra Bonasia, Susan Luong, Jocelyn Stairs, Aisling Clancy","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06077-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) are associated with significant risk of complications, including pain, infection, and long-term pelvic floor dysfunction. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the utility and acceptability of a postpartum telehealth consultation focused on pelvic floor health for patients after OASI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study used a pre-post design comparing standard postpartum care versus standard postpartum care plus a telehealth urogynecology consultation focused on pelvic floor recovery. The primary outcome was symptom burden as measured by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) score 16-weeks postpartum. Patient experience was evaluated using the QQ10 and the Patient Enablement Instrument. T-tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 119 participants completed study activities (control group n = 62, intervention group n = 57). There was no significant difference between the two groups in PFDI-20 scores (55.6 versus 46.6, p = 0.23). The individual items most likely to be endorsed among all participants were related to flatal incontinence (52.1%) and fecal urgency (49.6%). For the subset analysis of 35 patients with severe OASI (3C or fourth-degree tears), those who had a telehealth consultation had lower PFDI-20 scores (56.6 versus 34.7; p = 0.04). QQ10 estimated a value score of 79/100 and a burden score of 18/100 for the telehealth consultation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A postpartum telehealth consultation focused on pelvic floor health may benefit patients with severe OASI who reported reduced symptom burden. Participants rated a telehealth consultation as high value and low burden for this condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06077-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) are associated with significant risk of complications, including pain, infection, and long-term pelvic floor dysfunction. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the utility and acceptability of a postpartum telehealth consultation focused on pelvic floor health for patients after OASI.

Methods: This prospective study used a pre-post design comparing standard postpartum care versus standard postpartum care plus a telehealth urogynecology consultation focused on pelvic floor recovery. The primary outcome was symptom burden as measured by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) score 16-weeks postpartum. Patient experience was evaluated using the QQ10 and the Patient Enablement Instrument. T-tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare groups.

Results: A total of 119 participants completed study activities (control group n = 62, intervention group n = 57). There was no significant difference between the two groups in PFDI-20 scores (55.6 versus 46.6, p = 0.23). The individual items most likely to be endorsed among all participants were related to flatal incontinence (52.1%) and fecal urgency (49.6%). For the subset analysis of 35 patients with severe OASI (3C or fourth-degree tears), those who had a telehealth consultation had lower PFDI-20 scores (56.6 versus 34.7; p = 0.04). QQ10 estimated a value score of 79/100 and a burden score of 18/100 for the telehealth consultation.

Conclusions: A postpartum telehealth consultation focused on pelvic floor health may benefit patients with severe OASI who reported reduced symptom burden. Participants rated a telehealth consultation as high value and low burden for this condition.

评估产科肛门括约肌损伤后泌尿妇科远程健康咨询的益处。
产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)与并发症的显著风险相关,包括疼痛、感染和长期盆底功能障碍。本研究的主要目的是评估OASI患者盆底健康产后远程医疗咨询的实用性和可接受性。方法:本前瞻性研究采用前后设计,比较标准产后护理与标准产后护理加以盆底恢复为重点的远程医疗泌尿妇科会诊。主要结局为产后16周盆底窘迫量表(PFDI-20)评分所测量的症状负担。使用QQ10和患者使能仪对患者体验进行评估。组间比较采用t检验和卡方检验。结果:共有119名参与者完成了研究活动(对照组62人,干预组57人)。两组PFDI-20评分无显著差异(55.6比46.6,p = 0.23)。在所有参与者中,最可能被认可的个人项目与肠道失禁(52.1%)和大便急症(49.6%)有关。对于35例严重OASI (3C或四度撕裂)患者的亚组分析,进行远程医疗咨询的患者PFDI-20评分较低(56.6比34.7;p = 0.04)。QQ10对远程医疗咨询的价值评分为79/100,负担评分为18/100。结论:产后远程健康咨询关注盆底健康可能有利于严重OASI患者谁报告减轻症状负担。参与者认为远程医疗咨询对这种情况具有高价值和低负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信