Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Risk Prediction of Postpartum Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective Observational Study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Liyun Wang, Nana Wang, Minghui Zhang, Yujia Liu, Kaihui Sha
{"title":"Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Risk Prediction of Postpartum Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Liyun Wang, Nana Wang, Minghui Zhang, Yujia Liu, Kaihui Sha","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06057-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>This study aims to develop a postpartum stress urinary incontinence (PPSUI) risk prediction model based on an updated definition of PPSUI, using machine learning algorithms. The goal is to identify the best model for early clinical screening to improve screening accuracy and optimize clinical management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study collected data from 1208 postpartum women, with the dataset randomly divided into training and testing sets (8:2). Five machine learning algorithms-logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, support vector machines (SVM), and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)-were used to construct the PPSUI risk prediction model. Model performance was evaluated using multiple metrics, and the best-performing model was selected and validated for generalizability with the testing set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final model retained ten features: birth weight, weight gain during pregnancy, BMI before delivery, pre-pregnancy BMI, age of delivery, gestation, parity, pre-delivery uterine height, age of first delivery, and labor analgesia. Among the five algorithms, the random forest model performed best, with a test AUC of 0.995 (95% CI 0.990-0.999, P < 0.05), accuracy of 0.956, precision of 0.957, recall of 0.944, specificity of 0.966, and F1 score of 0.951. The model's high generalizability was confirmed with the testing set and further validated through bootstrapping and tenfold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The random forest model shows strong clinical potential for PPSUI risk prediction and early screening. Future studies should expand the sample size and include multi-center data to further enhance the model's clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06057-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: This study aims to develop a postpartum stress urinary incontinence (PPSUI) risk prediction model based on an updated definition of PPSUI, using machine learning algorithms. The goal is to identify the best model for early clinical screening to improve screening accuracy and optimize clinical management strategies.

Methods: This prospective study collected data from 1208 postpartum women, with the dataset randomly divided into training and testing sets (8:2). Five machine learning algorithms-logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, support vector machines (SVM), and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)-were used to construct the PPSUI risk prediction model. Model performance was evaluated using multiple metrics, and the best-performing model was selected and validated for generalizability with the testing set.

Results: The final model retained ten features: birth weight, weight gain during pregnancy, BMI before delivery, pre-pregnancy BMI, age of delivery, gestation, parity, pre-delivery uterine height, age of first delivery, and labor analgesia. Among the five algorithms, the random forest model performed best, with a test AUC of 0.995 (95% CI 0.990-0.999, P < 0.05), accuracy of 0.956, precision of 0.957, recall of 0.944, specificity of 0.966, and F1 score of 0.951. The model's high generalizability was confirmed with the testing set and further validated through bootstrapping and tenfold cross-validation.

Conclusion: The random forest model shows strong clinical potential for PPSUI risk prediction and early screening. Future studies should expand the sample size and include multi-center data to further enhance the model's clinical applicability.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信