Self-perceived knowledge, influencing factors and proposed educational interventions for diagnostic stewardship in the microbiology laboratory: The experience of Irish paediatric doctors.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rachel Barry, Colm O Tuathaigh, Robert Cunney
{"title":"Self-perceived knowledge, influencing factors and proposed educational interventions for diagnostic stewardship in the microbiology laboratory: The experience of Irish paediatric doctors.","authors":"Rachel Barry, Colm O Tuathaigh, Robert Cunney","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-03872-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lab users should display an understanding of microbiology tests and avoid inappropriate requests which may yield negative clinical consequences. Our research addressed diagnostic stewardship education and the perspectives of paediatric hospital doctors on their (1) self-perceived knowledge, (2) motivators for test ordering, (3) proposed educational interventions and (4) preferred teaching modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous, mixed-methods, 34-item online questionnaire was distributed to paediatric doctors across three Irish hospital sites from March to May 2023. Descriptive statistics summarised Likert-scale responses and inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse open-ended items. Subgroup analyses examined differences between consultants and non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 100 respondents (n = 45 consultants, n = 55 NCHDs, 24% response rate). Consultants scored higher than NCHDs in self-perceived knowledge (p < 0.001). Patient comorbidity, clinical status, local guidelines and accuracy of microbiological tests were the strongest motivators for test-ordering. Consultants were more likely to be influenced by accuracy (p = 0.03), costs (p = 0.01) and laboratory workload (p = 0.01). Only 27% reported formal teaching on diagnostic stewardship. NCHDs demonstrated increased willingness to engage in educational interventions (p = 0.024), and a comparatively higher interest in in-person teaching (p = 0.002) and gamification (p = 0.02). Respondents indicated a preference for formal guidelines on microbiology testing, in-person teaching, cost familiarisation and e-learning modules. Novel methods (peer-to-peer programmes, simulation and gamification) were less favoured. Dominant themes included; collaborative learning, increased microbiology presence, accessibility to education, barriers and administrative issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Formal diagnostic stewardship educational programmes should be integrated into post-graduate curriculums for both NCHDs and consultants. Focuses for educational interventions include; development of local diagnostic stewardship guidelines, teaching on the cost and accuracy of microbiology tests, senior supervision and role-modelling.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-03872-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lab users should display an understanding of microbiology tests and avoid inappropriate requests which may yield negative clinical consequences. Our research addressed diagnostic stewardship education and the perspectives of paediatric hospital doctors on their (1) self-perceived knowledge, (2) motivators for test ordering, (3) proposed educational interventions and (4) preferred teaching modalities.

Methods: An anonymous, mixed-methods, 34-item online questionnaire was distributed to paediatric doctors across three Irish hospital sites from March to May 2023. Descriptive statistics summarised Likert-scale responses and inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse open-ended items. Subgroup analyses examined differences between consultants and non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs).

Results: The analysis included 100 respondents (n = 45 consultants, n = 55 NCHDs, 24% response rate). Consultants scored higher than NCHDs in self-perceived knowledge (p < 0.001). Patient comorbidity, clinical status, local guidelines and accuracy of microbiological tests were the strongest motivators for test-ordering. Consultants were more likely to be influenced by accuracy (p = 0.03), costs (p = 0.01) and laboratory workload (p = 0.01). Only 27% reported formal teaching on diagnostic stewardship. NCHDs demonstrated increased willingness to engage in educational interventions (p = 0.024), and a comparatively higher interest in in-person teaching (p = 0.002) and gamification (p = 0.02). Respondents indicated a preference for formal guidelines on microbiology testing, in-person teaching, cost familiarisation and e-learning modules. Novel methods (peer-to-peer programmes, simulation and gamification) were less favoured. Dominant themes included; collaborative learning, increased microbiology presence, accessibility to education, barriers and administrative issues.

Conclusion: Formal diagnostic stewardship educational programmes should be integrated into post-graduate curriculums for both NCHDs and consultants. Focuses for educational interventions include; development of local diagnostic stewardship guidelines, teaching on the cost and accuracy of microbiology tests, senior supervision and role-modelling.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信