Self-perceived knowledge, influencing factors and proposed educational interventions for diagnostic stewardship in the microbiology laboratory: The experience of Irish paediatric doctors.
{"title":"Self-perceived knowledge, influencing factors and proposed educational interventions for diagnostic stewardship in the microbiology laboratory: The experience of Irish paediatric doctors.","authors":"Rachel Barry, Colm O Tuathaigh, Robert Cunney","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-03872-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lab users should display an understanding of microbiology tests and avoid inappropriate requests which may yield negative clinical consequences. Our research addressed diagnostic stewardship education and the perspectives of paediatric hospital doctors on their (1) self-perceived knowledge, (2) motivators for test ordering, (3) proposed educational interventions and (4) preferred teaching modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous, mixed-methods, 34-item online questionnaire was distributed to paediatric doctors across three Irish hospital sites from March to May 2023. Descriptive statistics summarised Likert-scale responses and inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse open-ended items. Subgroup analyses examined differences between consultants and non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 100 respondents (n = 45 consultants, n = 55 NCHDs, 24% response rate). Consultants scored higher than NCHDs in self-perceived knowledge (p < 0.001). Patient comorbidity, clinical status, local guidelines and accuracy of microbiological tests were the strongest motivators for test-ordering. Consultants were more likely to be influenced by accuracy (p = 0.03), costs (p = 0.01) and laboratory workload (p = 0.01). Only 27% reported formal teaching on diagnostic stewardship. NCHDs demonstrated increased willingness to engage in educational interventions (p = 0.024), and a comparatively higher interest in in-person teaching (p = 0.002) and gamification (p = 0.02). Respondents indicated a preference for formal guidelines on microbiology testing, in-person teaching, cost familiarisation and e-learning modules. Novel methods (peer-to-peer programmes, simulation and gamification) were less favoured. Dominant themes included; collaborative learning, increased microbiology presence, accessibility to education, barriers and administrative issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Formal diagnostic stewardship educational programmes should be integrated into post-graduate curriculums for both NCHDs and consultants. Focuses for educational interventions include; development of local diagnostic stewardship guidelines, teaching on the cost and accuracy of microbiology tests, senior supervision and role-modelling.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-03872-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Lab users should display an understanding of microbiology tests and avoid inappropriate requests which may yield negative clinical consequences. Our research addressed diagnostic stewardship education and the perspectives of paediatric hospital doctors on their (1) self-perceived knowledge, (2) motivators for test ordering, (3) proposed educational interventions and (4) preferred teaching modalities.
Methods: An anonymous, mixed-methods, 34-item online questionnaire was distributed to paediatric doctors across three Irish hospital sites from March to May 2023. Descriptive statistics summarised Likert-scale responses and inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse open-ended items. Subgroup analyses examined differences between consultants and non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs).
Results: The analysis included 100 respondents (n = 45 consultants, n = 55 NCHDs, 24% response rate). Consultants scored higher than NCHDs in self-perceived knowledge (p < 0.001). Patient comorbidity, clinical status, local guidelines and accuracy of microbiological tests were the strongest motivators for test-ordering. Consultants were more likely to be influenced by accuracy (p = 0.03), costs (p = 0.01) and laboratory workload (p = 0.01). Only 27% reported formal teaching on diagnostic stewardship. NCHDs demonstrated increased willingness to engage in educational interventions (p = 0.024), and a comparatively higher interest in in-person teaching (p = 0.002) and gamification (p = 0.02). Respondents indicated a preference for formal guidelines on microbiology testing, in-person teaching, cost familiarisation and e-learning modules. Novel methods (peer-to-peer programmes, simulation and gamification) were less favoured. Dominant themes included; collaborative learning, increased microbiology presence, accessibility to education, barriers and administrative issues.
Conclusion: Formal diagnostic stewardship educational programmes should be integrated into post-graduate curriculums for both NCHDs and consultants. Focuses for educational interventions include; development of local diagnostic stewardship guidelines, teaching on the cost and accuracy of microbiology tests, senior supervision and role-modelling.
期刊介绍:
The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker.
The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.