Inhalable Nano Formulation of Cabazitaxel: A Comparative Study with Intravenous Route.

IF 4.4 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Elif Kaga, Sadik Kaga, Korhan Altunbas, Nurullah Okumus
{"title":"Inhalable Nano Formulation of Cabazitaxel: A Comparative Study with Intravenous Route.","authors":"Elif Kaga, Sadik Kaga, Korhan Altunbas, Nurullah Okumus","doi":"10.1002/mabi.202400567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chemotherapy is generally given by intravenous (IV) administration which provides higher bioavailability than other systemic routes. However, in the case of lung cancer, the pulmonary (INH) route is the other choice for inhalable formulations. In the study, biochemical and histological parameters of Cabazitaxel (CBZ) free (2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) and nanoparticle (NP) (2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> CBZ equivalent) formulations are investigated after IV and INH administration in rats. The nanoformulation of CBZ is obtained using PEGylated polystyrene (PEG-PST) nanoparticles obtained by PISA. While a nose and head-only device is used for INH administration, a jugular vein is used as the IV route. Blood samples (blank, 24 h, and 48 h) are collected via carotid artery cannulas without handling in metabolism cages. According to biochemical parameters, free CBZ formulation applied via IV or INH route shows higher systemic toxicity. On the other hand, the nanoformulation of CBZ showed no signs of toxicity in both IV or INH routes. Higher and longer retention is observed in the case of inhaled nanoformulation. Histological analysis showed higher alveolar macrophage migration for inhaled nanoformulation due to enhanced retention. Results showed that nanotechnology and the lung defense system gave the advantage to end up with an inhalable nanomedicine formulation for lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":18103,"journal":{"name":"Macromolecular bioscience","volume":" ","pages":"e2400567"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macromolecular bioscience","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202400567","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemotherapy is generally given by intravenous (IV) administration which provides higher bioavailability than other systemic routes. However, in the case of lung cancer, the pulmonary (INH) route is the other choice for inhalable formulations. In the study, biochemical and histological parameters of Cabazitaxel (CBZ) free (2 mg kg-1) and nanoparticle (NP) (2 mg kg-1 CBZ equivalent) formulations are investigated after IV and INH administration in rats. The nanoformulation of CBZ is obtained using PEGylated polystyrene (PEG-PST) nanoparticles obtained by PISA. While a nose and head-only device is used for INH administration, a jugular vein is used as the IV route. Blood samples (blank, 24 h, and 48 h) are collected via carotid artery cannulas without handling in metabolism cages. According to biochemical parameters, free CBZ formulation applied via IV or INH route shows higher systemic toxicity. On the other hand, the nanoformulation of CBZ showed no signs of toxicity in both IV or INH routes. Higher and longer retention is observed in the case of inhaled nanoformulation. Histological analysis showed higher alveolar macrophage migration for inhaled nanoformulation due to enhanced retention. Results showed that nanotechnology and the lung defense system gave the advantage to end up with an inhalable nanomedicine formulation for lung cancer.

卡巴他赛可吸入纳米制剂与静脉途径的比较研究。
化疗通常通过静脉(IV)给药,比其他全身途径提供更高的生物利用度。然而,在肺癌的情况下,肺部(INH)途径是可吸入制剂的另一种选择。在本研究中,研究了不含卡巴他赛(CBZ) (2 mg kg-1)和纳米颗粒(NP) (2 mg kg-1 CBZ当量)制剂在大鼠静脉注射和INH后的生化和组织学参数。以聚乙二醇聚苯乙烯(PEG-PST)纳米粒子为原料,制备了CBZ的纳米配方。虽然只使用鼻子和头部的装置进行INH给药,但颈静脉被用作静脉注射途径。通过颈动脉插管采集血液样本(空白、24小时和48小时),在代谢笼中不处理。从生化指标来看,静脉注射或INH给药的游离CBZ制剂具有更高的全身毒性。另一方面,CBZ纳米制剂在IV或INH两种途径下均未显示出毒性迹象。在吸入纳米制剂的情况下,观察到更高和更长时间的滞留。组织学分析显示,吸入纳米制剂后,由于潴留增强,肺泡巨噬细胞迁移增加。结果表明,纳米技术和肺防御系统的优势最终导致了一种可吸入的肺癌纳米药物配方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Macromolecular bioscience
Macromolecular bioscience 生物-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Macromolecular Bioscience is a leading journal at the intersection of polymer and materials sciences with life science and medicine. With an Impact Factor of 2.895 (2018 Journal Impact Factor, Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2019)), it is currently ranked among the top biomaterials and polymer journals. Macromolecular Bioscience offers an attractive mixture of high-quality Reviews, Feature Articles, Communications, and Full Papers. With average reviewing times below 30 days, publication times of 2.5 months and listing in all major indices, including Medline, Macromolecular Bioscience is the journal of choice for your best contributions at the intersection of polymer and life sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信