Comparison of bison and elk susceptibility to experimental challenge with Brucella abortus strain 2308.

IF 2.6 2区农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES

Frontiers in Veterinary Science Pub Date : 2025-01-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fvets.2024.1519453

S C Olsen, P M Boggiatto, E J Putz

{"title":"Comparison of bison and elk susceptibility to experimental challenge with Brucella abortus strain 2308.","authors":"S C Olsen, P M Boggiatto, E J Putz","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2024.1519453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Brucellosis is endemic in bison and elk in Yellowstone National Park and surrounding areas.Methods: A comparative study was conducted using data from naive (n = 82 and 67, respectively) and Brucella abortus strain RB51 (RB51) vaccinated (n-99 and 29, respectively) bison and elk experimentally challenged with virulent B. abortus strain during pregnancy.Results: The incidence of abortion, fetal infection, uterine or mammary infection, or infection in maternal tissues after experimental challenge was greater (p < 0.05) in naïve and vaccinated bison when compared to similar groups in elk. Vaccinated bison had lower (p < 0.002) abortion rates and recovery of Brucella from fetal or uterine/mammary tissues when compared to naïve bison. Vaccinated elk had reduced (p < 0.01) rates of maternal infection, but rates of abortion and fetal or uterine/mammary infection did not differ (p > 0.05) from naïve elk. Naïve and vaccinated bison had greater (p < 0.05) Brucella colonization in placentomes, and parotid and supramammary lymphatic tissues when compared to elk. In elk or bison that aborted, mean colonization in placentome tissues were typically more than 5 logs higher than in animals that did not abort.Discussion: The results of our study suggest differences in disease pathogenesis between these two wildlife reservoirs of B. abortus.","PeriodicalId":12772,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","volume":"11 ","pages":"1519453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1519453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Brucellosis is endemic in bison and elk in Yellowstone National Park and surrounding areas.

Methods: A comparative study was conducted using data from naive (n = 82 and 67, respectively) and Brucella abortus strain RB51 (RB51) vaccinated (n-99 and 29, respectively) bison and elk experimentally challenged with virulent B. abortus strain during pregnancy.

Results: The incidence of abortion, fetal infection, uterine or mammary infection, or infection in maternal tissues after experimental challenge was greater (p < 0.05) in naïve and vaccinated bison when compared to similar groups in elk. Vaccinated bison had lower (p < 0.002) abortion rates and recovery of Brucella from fetal or uterine/mammary tissues when compared to naïve bison. Vaccinated elk had reduced (p < 0.01) rates of maternal infection, but rates of abortion and fetal or uterine/mammary infection did not differ (p > 0.05) from naïve elk. Naïve and vaccinated bison had greater (p < 0.05) Brucella colonization in placentomes, and parotid and supramammary lymphatic tissues when compared to elk. In elk or bison that aborted, mean colonization in placentome tissues were typically more than 5 logs higher than in animals that did not abort.

Discussion: The results of our study suggest differences in disease pathogenesis between these two wildlife reservoirs of B. abortus.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Frontiers in Veterinary Science Veterinary-General Veterinary

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

9.40%

发文量

1870

审稿时长

14 weeks

期刊介绍： Frontiers in Veterinary Science is a global, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that bridges animal and human health, brings a comparative approach to medical and surgical challenges, and advances innovative biotechnology and therapy. Veterinary research today is interdisciplinary, collaborative, and socially relevant, transforming how we understand and investigate animal health and disease. Fundamental research in emerging infectious diseases, predictive genomics, stem cell therapy, and translational modelling is grounded within the integrative social context of public and environmental health, wildlife conservation, novel biomarkers, societal well-being, and cutting-edge clinical practice and specialization. Frontiers in Veterinary Science brings a 21st-century approach—networked, collaborative, and Open Access—to communicate this progress and innovation to both the specialist and to the wider audience of readers in the field. Frontiers in Veterinary Science publishes articles on outstanding discoveries across a wide spectrum of translational, foundational, and clinical research. The journal''s mission is to bring all relevant veterinary sciences together on a single platform with the goal of improving animal and human health.