{"title":"The usefulness of HbA1c measurement in diabetic mouse models using various devices.","authors":"Kohya Miyazaki, Aisha Yokoi, Hiroyuki Inoue, Hirotaka Suzuki, Nozomi Kido, Ayumi Kanno, Maki Kimura-Koyanagi, Yoshiaki Kido, Shun-Ichiro Asahara","doi":"10.1538/expanim.24-0154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In most cases, the diagnosis of diabetes in animal models is based solely on blood glucose levels. While hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is widely used in the diagnosis of diabetes in humans, it is rarely measured in mice in diabetes research. This is thought to be because there are no established reference values for mouse HbA1c, as well as the fact that there are very few reports on the variability and reproducibility of measurements taken using different devices. In this study, we measured HbA1c levels in diabetic mouse models using different devices based on different principles, including capillary electrophoresis, high-performance liquid chromatography, and enzymatic methods, and compared the results. A positive correlation was observed between blood glucose and HbA1c levels in all measurement methods, and high reproducibility was confirmed in the measurement of HbA1c. However, HbA1c levels measured using the enzymatic method were slightly higher than those measured using the other two methods. In addition, an examination of diabetic mice given a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, which is used to treat diabetes, revealed that there was a 2-week difference in the fluctuation of mouse HbA1c levels compared with the fluctuation of blood glucose levels. Based on these results, it is thought that HbA1c can be a reliable indicator in diabetic mouse models, and it is expected to make the evaluation of abnormal glucose metabolism in mice more reliable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12102,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Animals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim.24-0154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In most cases, the diagnosis of diabetes in animal models is based solely on blood glucose levels. While hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is widely used in the diagnosis of diabetes in humans, it is rarely measured in mice in diabetes research. This is thought to be because there are no established reference values for mouse HbA1c, as well as the fact that there are very few reports on the variability and reproducibility of measurements taken using different devices. In this study, we measured HbA1c levels in diabetic mouse models using different devices based on different principles, including capillary electrophoresis, high-performance liquid chromatography, and enzymatic methods, and compared the results. A positive correlation was observed between blood glucose and HbA1c levels in all measurement methods, and high reproducibility was confirmed in the measurement of HbA1c. However, HbA1c levels measured using the enzymatic method were slightly higher than those measured using the other two methods. In addition, an examination of diabetic mice given a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, which is used to treat diabetes, revealed that there was a 2-week difference in the fluctuation of mouse HbA1c levels compared with the fluctuation of blood glucose levels. Based on these results, it is thought that HbA1c can be a reliable indicator in diabetic mouse models, and it is expected to make the evaluation of abnormal glucose metabolism in mice more reliable.
期刊介绍:
The aim of this international journal is to accelerate progress in laboratory animal experimentation and disseminate relevant information in related areas through publication of peer reviewed Original papers and Review articles. The journal covers basic to applied biomedical research centering around use of experimental animals and also covers topics related to experimental animals such as technology, management, and animal welfare.