'Muscular wisdom' revisited: Decaying rates of stimulation mitigate torque loss.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Raaj A Dudani, Alexander M Zero, Charles L Rice
{"title":"'Muscular wisdom' revisited: Decaying rates of stimulation mitigate torque loss.","authors":"Raaj A Dudani, Alexander M Zero, Charles L Rice","doi":"10.1113/EP092472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During a sustained high-intensity isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), declining motor unit firing rates (MUFRs) accompany torque loss. This decline (∼50% over 60 s) helps to maintain torque by preserving peripheral electrical propagation and matching the slowing contractile properties with torque loss (i.e., 'muscular wisdom'). However, it has been suggested that reduced MUFRs contribute to torque loss. Here, we compared torque loss between constant and decaying rates of electrical stimulation to mimic MUFRs reported during MVCs. The dorsiflexors of 8 males and 5 females (21-30 years) underwent three 60 s muscle fatiguing conditions: (1) sustained MVC; (2) constant high-frequency electrical stimulation (40 Hz); and (3) exponentially decaying stimulation rate (from 40 to 20 Hz). The decaying rate demonstrated less torque loss compared with the sustained high-frequency stimulation and the MVC conditions (P < 0.01). Furthermore, torque increased (by ∼17%, P < 0.005) when the constant high-frequency condition was switched to 20 Hz for 2 s at task termination. Conversely, torque loss was accelerated when the decaying stimulation rate was switched from 20 to 40 Hz for 2 s at task termination (by ∼16%, P < 0.001). Following all conditions, evoked twitch responses slowed (by 29%-77%, P < 0.01) but M-wave amplitude was reduced only for the constant high-frequency condition (by ∼23%, P < 0.01). Thus, the reduction in stimulation rates maintained optimal activation by matching the fatigue-induced contractile slowing in combination with preserved peripheral electrical conductance. Therefore, reducing the activation rate preserves torque, rather than contributing to torque loss during high-intensity contractions, thereby supporting the muscle wisdom hypothesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During a sustained high-intensity isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), declining motor unit firing rates (MUFRs) accompany torque loss. This decline (∼50% over 60 s) helps to maintain torque by preserving peripheral electrical propagation and matching the slowing contractile properties with torque loss (i.e., 'muscular wisdom'). However, it has been suggested that reduced MUFRs contribute to torque loss. Here, we compared torque loss between constant and decaying rates of electrical stimulation to mimic MUFRs reported during MVCs. The dorsiflexors of 8 males and 5 females (21-30 years) underwent three 60 s muscle fatiguing conditions: (1) sustained MVC; (2) constant high-frequency electrical stimulation (40 Hz); and (3) exponentially decaying stimulation rate (from 40 to 20 Hz). The decaying rate demonstrated less torque loss compared with the sustained high-frequency stimulation and the MVC conditions (P < 0.01). Furthermore, torque increased (by ∼17%, P < 0.005) when the constant high-frequency condition was switched to 20 Hz for 2 s at task termination. Conversely, torque loss was accelerated when the decaying stimulation rate was switched from 20 to 40 Hz for 2 s at task termination (by ∼16%, P < 0.001). Following all conditions, evoked twitch responses slowed (by 29%-77%, P < 0.01) but M-wave amplitude was reduced only for the constant high-frequency condition (by ∼23%, P < 0.01). Thus, the reduction in stimulation rates maintained optimal activation by matching the fatigue-induced contractile slowing in combination with preserved peripheral electrical conductance. Therefore, reducing the activation rate preserves torque, rather than contributing to torque loss during high-intensity contractions, thereby supporting the muscle wisdom hypothesis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental Physiology
Experimental Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged. Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信