Ventral Rectopexy: An International Expert Panel Consensus and Review of Contemporary Literature.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
William R G Perry, Peter Christensen, Rowan J Collinson, Julie A Cornish, Andre D'Hoore, Brooke Gurland, Anders Mellgren, Carlo Ratto, Frederic Ris, Andrew R L Stevenson, Liliana Bordeianou
{"title":"Ventral Rectopexy: An International Expert Panel Consensus and Review of Contemporary Literature.","authors":"William R G Perry, Peter Christensen, Rowan J Collinson, Julie A Cornish, Andre D'Hoore, Brooke Gurland, Anders Mellgren, Carlo Ratto, Frederic Ris, Andrew R L Stevenson, Liliana Bordeianou","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventral rectopexy has become increasingly utilized in the surgical management of rectal prolapse. There is a need for a contemporary evaluation of the role of the procedure and description of its use in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create an international consensus on ventral rectopexy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An expert panel undertook a scoping review of the literature to identify subject domains of interest. Literature reviews were completed for each domain with subsequent development of evidence-based and practice-based statements. These were compiled and reviewed by the group over a total of nine meetings. Once statements were confirmed, supportive text was finalized, and an anonymous vote was completed using REDCap to record consensus.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>An international expert panel comprising colorectal surgeons who perform ventral rectopexy in a high-volume center.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Statements and associated expert consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven experts identified ten domains for review: indications, contraindications, assessment and planning, consent, operative details, prostheses, complications, follow-up, recurrence and reoperative surgery and specific considerations. After round-table review, there were 17 resultant statements for consideration. Experts agreed unanimously with the thirteen of the statements and their accompanying text, with different experts disagreeing each with four statements (91% consensus each).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Paucity of high-quality data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This international group developed 17 statements with high consensus. These statements provide an up-to-date summary of the literature, identify key areas for research development and a reference point for colon and rectal surgeons who undertake ventral rectopexy as part of their practice. See Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003656","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ventral rectopexy has become increasingly utilized in the surgical management of rectal prolapse. There is a need for a contemporary evaluation of the role of the procedure and description of its use in clinical practice.

Objective: To create an international consensus on ventral rectopexy.

Design: An expert panel undertook a scoping review of the literature to identify subject domains of interest. Literature reviews were completed for each domain with subsequent development of evidence-based and practice-based statements. These were compiled and reviewed by the group over a total of nine meetings. Once statements were confirmed, supportive text was finalized, and an anonymous vote was completed using REDCap to record consensus.

Setting: An international expert panel comprising colorectal surgeons who perform ventral rectopexy in a high-volume center.

Main outcome measures: Statements and associated expert consensus.

Results: Eleven experts identified ten domains for review: indications, contraindications, assessment and planning, consent, operative details, prostheses, complications, follow-up, recurrence and reoperative surgery and specific considerations. After round-table review, there were 17 resultant statements for consideration. Experts agreed unanimously with the thirteen of the statements and their accompanying text, with different experts disagreeing each with four statements (91% consensus each).

Limitations: Paucity of high-quality data.

Conclusion: This international group developed 17 statements with high consensus. These statements provide an up-to-date summary of the literature, identify key areas for research development and a reference point for colon and rectal surgeons who undertake ventral rectopexy as part of their practice. See Video Abstract.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
572
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信