Long-term Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Ventral Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse Using Biologic Graft Prosthesis: A 15-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Michael L R Lonne, Amy M Y Cao, Ashley Jenkin, Liam J Convie, Grant E Stevenson, Jayson M Moloney, Andrew R L Stevenson
{"title":"Long-term Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Ventral Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse Using Biologic Graft Prosthesis: A 15-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Michael L R Lonne, Amy M Y Cao, Ashley Jenkin, Liam J Convie, Grant E Stevenson, Jayson M Moloney, Andrew R L Stevenson","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive ventral rectopexy has widely become the preferred prolapse procedure. However there have been recent concerns regarding the safety of permanent synthetic mesh in the pelvis. Biologic grafts have also been commonly used as an alternative prosthesis, but data on their safety and the longevity of the prolapse repair have been lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the short and long-term safety and efficacy of biologic grafts in minimally invasive ventral rectopexy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using data from a prospectively collected database.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Single surgeon at a single tertiary hospital in Australia.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>There were 366 patients with minimum 6 months follow-up undergoing minimally invasive ventral rectopexy using a biologic graft between January 1, 2008, and October 5, 2023.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Overall recurrence, complications and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 57 patients (15.6%, n = 57) experienced a recurrence during the study period, with a median follow up time of 35.5 months (range, 6-183 months). Of these, 17 (4.6%) were full thickness recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence rates were 2.0%, 6.0% and 16.0% respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in recurrence for patients who presented with a full thickness prolapse compared to those with other indications (16.8% vs 14.2%, p=0.29). Overall, there were a total of 34 complications which occurred in 29 (7.9%) patients. 19 patients (5.2%) required a return to theatre. There were no graft related complications or long-term pelvic pain. 98% of patients had symptomatic improvement and were satisfied with their outcome.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective study and generalizability of the results from single surgeon experience. Late recurrences may have been missed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimally invasive ventral rectopexy using a biological graft is both safe and effective, offering acceptable short- and long-term recurrence rates and overall complications with no graft related morbidity. See Video.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003661","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive ventral rectopexy has widely become the preferred prolapse procedure. However there have been recent concerns regarding the safety of permanent synthetic mesh in the pelvis. Biologic grafts have also been commonly used as an alternative prosthesis, but data on their safety and the longevity of the prolapse repair have been lacking.

Objective: To assess the short and long-term safety and efficacy of biologic grafts in minimally invasive ventral rectopexy.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using data from a prospectively collected database.

Settings: Single surgeon at a single tertiary hospital in Australia.

Patients: There were 366 patients with minimum 6 months follow-up undergoing minimally invasive ventral rectopexy using a biologic graft between January 1, 2008, and October 5, 2023.

Main outcome measures: Overall recurrence, complications and functional outcomes.

Results: A total of 57 patients (15.6%, n = 57) experienced a recurrence during the study period, with a median follow up time of 35.5 months (range, 6-183 months). Of these, 17 (4.6%) were full thickness recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence rates were 2.0%, 6.0% and 16.0% respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in recurrence for patients who presented with a full thickness prolapse compared to those with other indications (16.8% vs 14.2%, p=0.29). Overall, there were a total of 34 complications which occurred in 29 (7.9%) patients. 19 patients (5.2%) required a return to theatre. There were no graft related complications or long-term pelvic pain. 98% of patients had symptomatic improvement and were satisfied with their outcome.

Limitations: Retrospective study and generalizability of the results from single surgeon experience. Late recurrences may have been missed.

Conclusions: Minimally invasive ventral rectopexy using a biological graft is both safe and effective, offering acceptable short- and long-term recurrence rates and overall complications with no graft related morbidity. See Video.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
572
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信