Randomized controlled trials of digital health interventions for rheumatic disease management: a systematic review.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bulletin of the World Health Organization Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-11 DOI:10.2471/BLT.24.292168
Anindita Santosa, James Weiquan Li, Tze Chin Tan
{"title":"Randomized controlled trials of digital health interventions for rheumatic disease management: a systematic review.","authors":"Anindita Santosa, James Weiquan Li, Tze Chin Tan","doi":"10.2471/BLT.24.292168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the adoption, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions for rheumatic disease management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 25 May 2024 and 2 June 2024, we systematically searched PubMed®, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Global Observatory for eHealth and the World Bank Open Knowledge Repository for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating digital health interventions for rheumatic disease management. We included studies published between 2000 and 2024 that reported on adoption rates and efficacy. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data and categorized the digital interventions according to the World Health Organization's classification of digital health interventions.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 455 unique records identified, 21 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Most digital health interventions (15 studies) focused on individual-centric interventions, such as targeted communication, personal health tracking, educational tools and wearable devices. Studies in high-income countries implemented advanced, integrated digital interventions combining individual-focused approaches with health worker interventions and data services using telemedicine platforms and decision support systems. In contrast, studies in low- and middle-income countries adapted accessible technologies such as mobile messaging and telephone-based education. Many telehealth, wearable technologies and educational interventions significantly improved disease control, patient adherence, knowledge and self-efficacy. Of the five studies assessing cost-effectiveness, all found digital interventions to be cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital health interventions show promise for managing rheumatic diseases. Tailoring these interventions to local infrastructure and emphasizing patient engagement are crucial for successful adoption. Future research should focus on standardizing evaluation methods, addressing digital divides and enhancing provider support and data services.</p>","PeriodicalId":9465,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","volume":"103 2","pages":"136-147"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.24.292168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the adoption, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions for rheumatic disease management.

Methods: Between 25 May 2024 and 2 June 2024, we systematically searched PubMed®, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Global Observatory for eHealth and the World Bank Open Knowledge Repository for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating digital health interventions for rheumatic disease management. We included studies published between 2000 and 2024 that reported on adoption rates and efficacy. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data and categorized the digital interventions according to the World Health Organization's classification of digital health interventions.

Findings: Of the 455 unique records identified, 21 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Most digital health interventions (15 studies) focused on individual-centric interventions, such as targeted communication, personal health tracking, educational tools and wearable devices. Studies in high-income countries implemented advanced, integrated digital interventions combining individual-focused approaches with health worker interventions and data services using telemedicine platforms and decision support systems. In contrast, studies in low- and middle-income countries adapted accessible technologies such as mobile messaging and telephone-based education. Many telehealth, wearable technologies and educational interventions significantly improved disease control, patient adherence, knowledge and self-efficacy. Of the five studies assessing cost-effectiveness, all found digital interventions to be cost-effective.

Conclusion: Digital health interventions show promise for managing rheumatic diseases. Tailoring these interventions to local infrastructure and emphasizing patient engagement are crucial for successful adoption. Future research should focus on standardizing evaluation methods, addressing digital divides and enhancing provider support and data services.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

风湿病管理数字健康干预的随机对照试验:系统综述。
目的:评价风湿病管理中数字健康干预的采用、有效性和成本效益。方法:在2024年5月25日至2024年6月2日期间,我们系统地检索了PubMed®、Scopus、ClinicalTrials.gov、全球电子卫生观察站和世界银行开放知识库,以获取评估风湿病管理数字健康干预措施的随机对照试验(rct)。我们纳入了2000年至2024年间发表的关于采用率和有效性的研究。两位审稿人独立筛选了这些研究,提取了数据,并根据世界卫生组织的数字卫生干预措施分类对数字干预措施进行了分类。结果:在确定的455个独特记录中,21个rct符合纳入标准。大多数数字健康干预措施(15项研究)侧重于以个人为中心的干预措施,如有针对性的沟通、个人健康跟踪、教育工具和可穿戴设备。在高收入国家进行的研究实施了先进的综合数字干预措施,将以个人为重点的方法与卫生工作者干预措施和使用远程医疗平台和决策支持系统的数据服务相结合。相比之下,低收入和中等收入国家的研究采用了移动短信和基于电话的教育等无障碍技术。许多远程保健、可穿戴技术和教育干预措施显著改善了疾病控制、患者依从性、知识和自我效能。在评估成本效益的五项研究中,所有研究都发现数字干预具有成本效益。结论:数字健康干预显示了管理风湿病的希望。根据当地基础设施调整这些干预措施并强调患者参与是成功采用的关键。未来的研究应侧重于规范评估方法,解决数字鸿沟,加强提供者支持和数据服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Bulletin of the World Health Organization 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.90%
发文量
317
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the World Health Organization Journal Overview: Leading public health journal Peer-reviewed monthly journal Special focus on developing countries Global scope and authority Top public and environmental health journal Impact factor of 6.818 (2018), according to Web of Science ranking Audience: Essential reading for public health decision-makers and researchers Provides blend of research, well-informed opinion, and news
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信