Health workers' adoption of digital health technology in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bulletin of the World Health Organization Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.2471/BLT.24.292157
Minmin Wang, Kepei Huang, Xiangning Li, Xuetong Zhao, Laura Downey, Sondus Hassounah, Xiaoyun Liu, Yinzi Jin, Minghui Ren
{"title":"Health workers' adoption of digital health technology in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Minmin Wang, Kepei Huang, Xiangning Li, Xuetong Zhao, Laura Downey, Sondus Hassounah, Xiaoyun Liu, Yinzi Jin, Minghui Ren","doi":"10.2471/BLT.24.292157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the facilitators of and barriers to the acceptance and use of digital health technology by health workers in low- and middle-income countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched several databases for relevant articles published until 25 April 2024. We extracted data on four unified theories of acceptance and use of technology factors (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions) and six additional factors (attitude, habit, incentive, risk, trust and self-efficacy); how these affected the outcomes of behavioural intention and actual use; and the strength of association if reported. We conducted a meta-analysis of the quantitative studies.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We reviewed 36 publications, 20 of which were included in our meta-analysis. We observed that performance expectancy was the most frequently reported facilitator (in 21 studies; 58.3%) and that lack of facilitating conditions was the most cited barrier (10; 27.8%). From our meta-analysis, trust (<i>r</i> = 0.53; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.18 to 0.76) and facilitating conditions (<i>r</i> = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.55) were the leading facilitators of behavioural intention and actual use, respectively. We identified concerns with performance expectancy (<i>r</i> = -0.14, 95% CI: -0.29 to 0.01) as the primary barrier to both outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our approach of clustering the facilitators of and barriers to the acceptance and use of digital health technology from the perspective of health workers highlighted the importance of creating an enabling ecosystem. Supportive infrastructure, tailored training programmes and incentive policies should be incorporated in the implementation of digital health programmes in low- and middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":9465,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","volume":"103 2","pages":"126-135F"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.24.292157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the facilitators of and barriers to the acceptance and use of digital health technology by health workers in low- and middle-income countries.

Methods: We searched several databases for relevant articles published until 25 April 2024. We extracted data on four unified theories of acceptance and use of technology factors (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions) and six additional factors (attitude, habit, incentive, risk, trust and self-efficacy); how these affected the outcomes of behavioural intention and actual use; and the strength of association if reported. We conducted a meta-analysis of the quantitative studies.

Findings: We reviewed 36 publications, 20 of which were included in our meta-analysis. We observed that performance expectancy was the most frequently reported facilitator (in 21 studies; 58.3%) and that lack of facilitating conditions was the most cited barrier (10; 27.8%). From our meta-analysis, trust (r = 0.53; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.18 to 0.76) and facilitating conditions (r = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.55) were the leading facilitators of behavioural intention and actual use, respectively. We identified concerns with performance expectancy (r = -0.14, 95% CI: -0.29 to 0.01) as the primary barrier to both outcomes.

Conclusion: Our approach of clustering the facilitators of and barriers to the acceptance and use of digital health technology from the perspective of health workers highlighted the importance of creating an enabling ecosystem. Supportive infrastructure, tailored training programmes and incentive policies should be incorporated in the implementation of digital health programmes in low- and middle-income countries.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Bulletin of the World Health Organization 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.90%
发文量
317
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the World Health Organization Journal Overview: Leading public health journal Peer-reviewed monthly journal Special focus on developing countries Global scope and authority Top public and environmental health journal Impact factor of 6.818 (2018), according to Web of Science ranking Audience: Essential reading for public health decision-makers and researchers Provides blend of research, well-informed opinion, and news
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信