US general population food allergy treatment preferences: a discrete choice experiment.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2025.2459784
Alexis T Mickle, Christina E Ciaccio, Arpamas Seetasith, Karissa M Johnston, Jessica S Dunne, Stacey Kowal, Andrea Bever, Stella Ko, Vincent Garmo, Sachin Gupta, Andrew Lloyd, Christopher M Warren
{"title":"US general population food allergy treatment preferences: a discrete choice experiment.","authors":"Alexis T Mickle, Christina E Ciaccio, Arpamas Seetasith, Karissa M Johnston, Jessica S Dunne, Stacey Kowal, Andrea Bever, Stella Ko, Vincent Garmo, Sachin Gupta, Andrew Lloyd, Christopher M Warren","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2459784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify treatment preferences for food allergy management options (oral immunotherapy, biologic therapy, and allergen avoidance), overall and by sociodemographic strata.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A US general population (≥13 years) discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted, including the Intolerance of Uncertainty-12 Scale and clinical/demographic questions. Conditional logistic regression analyses were conducted overall and by sociodemographic factors. DCE results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 294) mean (standard deviation) age was 47 (19.7) years; 48.6% were male. A 1% reduction in risk of having an exposure resulting in a moderate-to-severe reaction was statistically significantly associated with treatment preference (OR: 1.10; CI:1.04-1.16; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Features significantly associated with reduced preference included: a 1% increase in risk of treatment-related, severe anaphylaxis (0.85; 0.74-0.97; <i>p</i>=0.02); a 1% increase in risk of gastrointestinal symptoms (0.99; 0.99-0.99; <i>p</i> < 0.01); daily treatment (<i>vs.</i> every 2-4 weeks; 0.81; 0.72-0.91; <i>p</i> < 0.01); in-clinic administration (<i>vs.</i> at-home; 0.76; 0.66-0.87; <i>p</i> < 0.01); subcutaneous administration (<i>vs.</i> oral; 0.69; 0.61-0.78; <i>p</i> < 0.01); three-hour post-treatment physical activity limitation (0.84; 0.77-0.93; <i>p</i> < 0.01); and one-year life expectancy reduction (0.87; 0.85-0.89; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Rural dwellers favoured at-home use and no activity limits; lower-income respondents preferred convenience (oral, less frequent, and at-home administration). Teens strongly preferred being bite-safe (<i>vs.</i> fully allergic; 2.75; 1.09-6.90; <i>p</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When making food allergy management decisions, US general population respondents had strong preferences for features related to safety and convenience; however, the magnitude of preferences varied by sociodemographic factors. These findings may be pertinent for population-level health decision makers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"269-279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2459784","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To quantify treatment preferences for food allergy management options (oral immunotherapy, biologic therapy, and allergen avoidance), overall and by sociodemographic strata.

Methods: A US general population (≥13 years) discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted, including the Intolerance of Uncertainty-12 Scale and clinical/demographic questions. Conditional logistic regression analyses were conducted overall and by sociodemographic factors. DCE results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Participants (n = 294) mean (standard deviation) age was 47 (19.7) years; 48.6% were male. A 1% reduction in risk of having an exposure resulting in a moderate-to-severe reaction was statistically significantly associated with treatment preference (OR: 1.10; CI:1.04-1.16; p < 0.01). Features significantly associated with reduced preference included: a 1% increase in risk of treatment-related, severe anaphylaxis (0.85; 0.74-0.97; p=0.02); a 1% increase in risk of gastrointestinal symptoms (0.99; 0.99-0.99; p < 0.01); daily treatment (vs. every 2-4 weeks; 0.81; 0.72-0.91; p < 0.01); in-clinic administration (vs. at-home; 0.76; 0.66-0.87; p < 0.01); subcutaneous administration (vs. oral; 0.69; 0.61-0.78; p < 0.01); three-hour post-treatment physical activity limitation (0.84; 0.77-0.93; p < 0.01); and one-year life expectancy reduction (0.87; 0.85-0.89; p < 0.01). Rural dwellers favoured at-home use and no activity limits; lower-income respondents preferred convenience (oral, less frequent, and at-home administration). Teens strongly preferred being bite-safe (vs. fully allergic; 2.75; 1.09-6.90; p = 0.03).

Conclusion: When making food allergy management decisions, US general population respondents had strong preferences for features related to safety and convenience; however, the magnitude of preferences varied by sociodemographic factors. These findings may be pertinent for population-level health decision makers.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信