Francesco Ramundo, Elena Rossi, Ketty Peris, Alfredo Pontecorvi, Gabriele Sani, Silvia Betti, Marco Marietta, Valerio De Stefano
{"title":"Improving the management of Polycythemia Vera patients eligible for cytoreduction: report of a multidisciplinary advisory board.","authors":"Francesco Ramundo, Elena Rossi, Ketty Peris, Alfredo Pontecorvi, Gabriele Sani, Silvia Betti, Marco Marietta, Valerio De Stefano","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2458531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The management of patients with Polycythemia Vera (PV) traditionally includes low-dose aspirin, phlebotomy, and cytoreductive therapy for high-risk individuals. Recent evidence suggests that cytoreductive treatment may be warranted for patients with additional risk factors beyond the traditional criteria of a history of thrombosis and age over 60 years. Introducing new therapeutic agents, including ropeginterferon alfa-2b and ruxolitinib, enables a more personalized treatment approach tailored to individual patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>This report presents three complex clinical scenarios involving patients with PV who required cytoreductive therapy, which were discussed by a multidisciplinary advisory board. Each case is accompanied by a concise literature review and recommendations from non-hematologist specialists on managing adverse events associated with cytoreductive treatment. A multidisciplinary expert panel has identified three conceptual pathways to guide clinicians in selecting cytoreductive therapies and managing their associated complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The advent of new criteria for starting cytoreduction and the approval of novel drugs for PV has increased the complexity of selecting appropriate cytoreductive therapies. A multidisciplinary approach is increasingly essential to ensure personalized care that maximizes tolerability and minimizes adverse events, particularly given the often chronic nature of the treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"239-245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2458531","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The management of patients with Polycythemia Vera (PV) traditionally includes low-dose aspirin, phlebotomy, and cytoreductive therapy for high-risk individuals. Recent evidence suggests that cytoreductive treatment may be warranted for patients with additional risk factors beyond the traditional criteria of a history of thrombosis and age over 60 years. Introducing new therapeutic agents, including ropeginterferon alfa-2b and ruxolitinib, enables a more personalized treatment approach tailored to individual patient characteristics.
Case report: This report presents three complex clinical scenarios involving patients with PV who required cytoreductive therapy, which were discussed by a multidisciplinary advisory board. Each case is accompanied by a concise literature review and recommendations from non-hematologist specialists on managing adverse events associated with cytoreductive treatment. A multidisciplinary expert panel has identified three conceptual pathways to guide clinicians in selecting cytoreductive therapies and managing their associated complications.
Conclusion: The advent of new criteria for starting cytoreduction and the approval of novel drugs for PV has increased the complexity of selecting appropriate cytoreductive therapies. A multidisciplinary approach is increasingly essential to ensure personalized care that maximizes tolerability and minimizes adverse events, particularly given the often chronic nature of the treatment.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance